This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rejected Thursday a challenge to the mandatory membership requirements imposed by the State Bar of Michigan. Lucille Taylor, a lawyer from Michigan, challenged the state bar membership mandate on the grounds that it violates her freedom of association.
A Michigan packaging company's tax exemption appeal was properly dismissed by the state Tax Tribunal over a lack of jurisdiction, the Michigan Supreme Courtruled, overturning an appellate courtdecision.
As is frequently the case when the court denies review in cases that have been relisted repeatedly, denial occasioned dissent, this time from Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch. The court relisted Escobar back in June 2024 and has been holding it ever since, pending the resolution of Glossip. 28 and Mar.
Supreme Courtruled that public officials may be held liable for their social media activity in certain circumstances. In 2014, Freed updated his Facebook page to reflect his position as city manager of Port Huron, Michigan. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. In Lindke v. Freed , 601 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S.
He once hosted a former student from Florida at his lakeside vacation house in Michigan, where he claimed on his Facebook page that they “solved a murder.” A police chief in Michigan said Harpster’s class paid off immediately after a man called 911 and said he had just found his mother and sister dead. “He He did it!!”.
Editors note – I invited Professor Nina Mendelson (University of Michigan Law School) to author a guest post after reading her 2020 Admin. Hirshfeld has the legal power to fulfill the expanded job as required by the Supreme Court’s decision. The leading Supreme Courtdecision, United States v.
Thus, starting in 1988 (when, as part of broader reforms to the court’s docket, Congress eliminated the ability to directly appeal to the Supreme Court district courtdecisions striking down state or federal statutes), the practice became all but moribund.
And I had their ear, explaining Supreme Courtdecisions on a regular basis over many years. Once I got home and re-entered my own real world, the fact that I could talk about the Supreme Court on ABC News meant absolutely zero. In June, the courtruled in R.G. & Aimee Stephens. 7, 1960 – May 12, 2020).
”) in Michigan who was ordered to remove this sweater with the popular phrase “Let’s Go, Brandon.” ” We now have a ruling from U.S. District Judge Paul Maloney in the Western District of Michigan. However, the Plaintiffs cited other lower courtdecisions striking a balance in such cases.
Former President Donald Trump filed an appeal Wednesday asking the US Supreme Court to reverse the Colorado Supreme Courtdecision barring him from the state’s ballot. The original decision will now be on hold until the US Supreme Courtrules on the appeal. Trump also appealed the Maine decision.
.” Former Colorado Republican state senator and lead plaintiff Norma Anderson reacted after the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling, stating, “I was surprised and delighted. I’m very happy with the ruling. I felt they read the Constitution. I sat and watched January 6 all day long, and I cried.”
27, the Michigan Supreme Court declined to review a lower-courtdecision that allowed Trump to appear on the state’s primary ballot. As in Minnesota, the lower court’sruling does not foreclose a new challenge to Trump’s appearance on the general election ballot. In a ruling on Dec. And on Dec.
While I am a critic of Trump’s speech and actions on that day, I still believe that the the court is completely wrong on the First Amendment. ” The decision comes just days after another defeat in Michigan for advocates of this theory. In Brandenburg v. I hope that she does. Here is the opinion: Anderson v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content