Remove Court Decisions Remove Court Rules Remove Missouri Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Supreme Court to consider bid for first religious charter school

SCOTUSBlog

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Wednesday in a Catholic virtual charter schools bid to become the nations first religious charter school. But the states attorney general counters that a ruling in favor of the Catholic school could upend the charter-school system nationwide.

Court 110
article thumbnail

The Myth Of The Modern Swing Vote

Above The Law

In this article, I analyze all 104 closely divided Supreme Court decisions from 2020 onwardthe Barrett eraeach decided by either a 54 or 63 vote. The Court ruled that the governments use of fragmented notices in removal proceedings violated statutory requirements. Missouri and Biden v. If so, who fills that role?

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Anti-ESG Movement Has Not Fared Well in Court, but Critical Decisions Are Pending

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Investors who want the flexibility to consider all relevant risks to their investments have challenged these rules and laws in court, and, in both state and federal cases, the effort has succeeded. Recent Victories The decision from Missouri, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association [ (SIFMA) ] v.

Court 86
article thumbnail

Court adds seven new cases to the 2025-26 term

SCOTUSBlog

Durnell , a case by a Missouri man who contends that he developed cancer as a result of his exposure to Monsanto’s weedkiller Roundup. Since then, the court has only allowed two other claims – known as Bivens actions – to go forward, cautioning that such cases are “disfavored judicial activity.” There is no deadline for the U.S.

Court 126
article thumbnail

September 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The New Jersey court also found no basis for Grable jurisdiction, rejecting the companies’ arguments that the City’s claims necessarily raised substantial and actually disputed issues of federal law such as First Amendment issues or issues addressed by federal environmental statutes. Missouri v. Army Corps of Engineers , No.

article thumbnail

August 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The Ninth Circuit declined to remand with instructions for dismissal of the underlying action and also declined to vacate any district court decisions.

Court 40