Court Decisions Court Rules Technology 
HowAppealing
FEBRUARY 25, 2021
Sixth Circuit reinstates Ohio State University’s Lanham Act and state law right-of-publicity claims against Redbubble : You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit at this link.
Patently O
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Currently, a new generation of generative AI technology is increasingly being used for creation. This court ruling signals China’s interest in extending copyright law to better account for AI-generated content and also potentially places the country in the forefront of protecting AI creations.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
MAY 25, 2021
In a 2-1 panel decision, the court also found that the was overly broad. In so ruling, the appellate court reversed a January 2019 district court decision.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 1, 2023
Share As expected, Thursday’s decision in Slack Technologies v. Pirani rejected a lower-court ruling that had substantially broadened liability for publicly traded companies under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933. Rather, shareholders sell theirpreexisting shares into the public securities market.
Broadcast Law Blog
APRIL 18, 2013
We’ve written extensively about copyright issues for audio services, but the big copyright decision that recently made headlines is a TV issue, though one that could have an impact on audio as well. Why, then, did the Court rule that no public performance was involved?
Patently O
DECEMBER 11, 2023
We, who have been writing and teaching about copyright law and how it has responded to challenges posed by new technologies for decades, were among those who submitted comments, see [link]. 6] Machine learning based on copyrighted works is an application of text data mining, not a separate technological or legal phenomenon.
Constitutional Law Reporter
APRIL 10, 2024
Supreme Court ruled that public officials may be held liable for their social media activity in certain circumstances. The District Court found that because Freed managed his Facebook page in his private capacity, and because only state action can give rise to liability under §1983, Lindke’s claim failed. In Lindke v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
100 
Let's personalize your content