This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Share The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Feb. 24 in the case of a man on Texas death row who has long tried to obtain postconviction DNA testing on evidence that he says would exonerate him. Now the Supreme Court will weigh in. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit threw out that ruling in February 2024.
“Appeals courtruling says alleged domestic abusers have a constitutional right to keep their guns; Advocates for domestic violence victims were stunned by the 5th U.S.
Abbott’s ban on school mask mandates back in effect after Appeals Courtdecision; U.S. ” You can access today’s ruling of a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S.
As is frequently the case when the court denies review in cases that have been relisted repeatedly, denial occasioned dissent, this time from Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch. Areli Escobar was convicted in a Texas state court of the sexual assault and murder of Biana Maldonado Hernandez and sentenced to death.
New York State is currently a ppealing a decision by a lower court to strike down restrictions enacted by the state following the Supreme Courtdecision on carrying guns in specific public places, such as Times Square. The case is pending before the Fifth U.S.
Bourgeois was convicted in 2004 of murdering his two-year old daughter while making a delivery to Corpus Christi Naval Air Station in Texas. The Supreme Courtruled in 2002 in Atkins v. Evidence at trial showed that he had beaten his daughter for a month before her death. His appeal was unsuccessful.
Reynolds Vapor Company and a group of retailers based in Texas and Mississippi, primarily fielded questions from just two justices, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson a promising sign for his clients. The question comes to the court as part of the FDAs efforts to regulate the multibillion-dollar vaping industry. (The
10 conference, but the decision to grant a second tranche of petitions from that conference followed similar moves in late 2020 and 2019, allowing the justices to add more cases to their docket for the second half of the term without having to wait for the next regularly scheduled conference, on Jan. In Torres v. And in LeDure v.
In a 2-1 panel decision, the court also found that the was overly broad. In so ruling, the appellate court reversed a January 2019 district courtdecision. Courts in Arizona , Kansas and Texas have also ruled against these laws. There are good-faith objections to the BDS movement.
Texas , involving allegations that a racially biased juror, who commented during voir dire that “non-white” races were statistically more violent than whites, served on petitioner Kristopher Love’s capital sentencing jury. Some older Supreme Courtdecisions support that theory of consent. Texas , 21-6001.
marshals followed Jade Benning, a 48-year-old mother of three with jet-black hair, as she picked up her youngest son from school in Austin, Texas. But when prosecutors cross the line and intentionally circumvent courtrules for evidence standards, he said, that’s cause for concern. And the FBI was right in the middle of it.
In October, the federal district court for the Eastern District of Texas denied the plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction. Oklahoma Federal Court Allowed Landowner to Proceed with NEPA Challenge of Osage Nation Oil and Gas Leases. Hawaii CourtRuled that Commercial Aquarium Fishing Required Environmental Review.
Two other states—Texas and North Dakota—filed an amicus brief supporting EPA; the petitioners opposed their participation on procedural grounds. The district courtruled that EPA was required to conduct such evaluations in October 2016 and set an expedited schedule for EPA’s compliance. Clean Air Council v. Pruitt , No.
Texas , 599 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Courtruled that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge a Biden Administration immigration enforcement policy. In their opinion, Congress specifically prohibited courts from issuing injunctions related to certain immigration laws. In United States v.
Lincoln of The Wrap reports that “ Appeals CourtRulesTexas DA’s ‘Cuties’ Child Porn Charges Against Netflix to Be ‘Bad-Faith Prosecution’; 5th Circuit Courtdecision upholds 2022 lower courtruling.” .” Gene Maddaus of Variety has this report.
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments today in the Biden administration’s appeal of lower-courtrulings that required immigration officials to reinstate the “Remain in Mexico” policy that the administration “has twice determined is not in the interests of the United States,” reports the Associated Press.
In a 6-3 decision Ex parte Danny Richard Lane , the state’s highest criminal appeals courtruled that Texas’ historical doctrine of “judicial clemency” does not forgive sex offender registration. The Texas Legislature in 1991 enacted the state’s first sex offender registration program.
Share A trade group for the adult entertainment industry will appear at the Supreme Court on Wednesday in its challenge to a Texas law that requires pornography sites to verify the age of their users before providing access for example, by requiring a government-issued identification. 1181, in June 2023.
Thus, starting in 1988 (when, as part of broader reforms to the court’s docket, Congress eliminated the ability to directly appeal to the Supreme Court district courtdecisions striking down state or federal statutes), the practice became all but moribund.
“Supreme Court Allows Challenge to Texas Abortion Law but Leaves It in Effect; The law, which bans most abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy, was drafted to evade review in federal court and has been in effect since September”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. ” David G.
The family courtdecision was reviewed by Judges Stan Pritzker, John Egan Jr., They admit that the rock was “not addressed by family court or the attorney for the child, the mother’s testimony at the hearing, as well as an exhibit admitted into evidence.” However, the mother’s home was left as the child’s residence.
In a brief unsigned order , the justices put on hold an order by a federal trial judge in Texas that would have barred the government from enforcing the law anywhere in the United States. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the courtsdecision to temporarily block the lower courtsruling.
Beyond that, it now accurately identifies all categories of original jurisdiction cases and even provides examples, including the relatively unknown 1892 decision in United States v. When confronted with a straightforward question about the start of the Supreme Court term (Question #2), it included a reference to 28 U.S.C.
But given courtdecisions in this area, it would take an act of Congress to allow the FCC to allow such channeling. This question, and other questions about the political rules were discussed last week in a webinar that I conducted for the Texas Association of Broadcasters.
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit affirmed that ruling. A trade group of thoroughbred racehorse owners and trainers called the National Horsemens Benevolent & Protective Association filed a different challenge to the law in Texas. Relisted after the Jan. 10 conference.) Relisted after the Jan. 10 conference.)
Circuit Found Deficiencies in Climate Change and Environmental Justice Analyses for Texas LNG Export Terminals. The Ninth Circuit said the new issuance of NWP 12 rendered the appeals moot and ordered the district court to dismiss the underlying claim. Plaintiffs appealed the transfer decision to the 4th Federal Regional Court.
Texas held criminal “deviant intercourse” laws violated the 14th Amendment under rational basis review. This minimal test requires government action to have a legitimate purpose and the law in question to be rationally related to that purpose. Occasionally, “rational basis with teeth” finds laws lack even a legitimate purpose – Lawrence v.
The question came to the court in the case of Ryan Carter , who was a member of the Air National Guard when he underwent spine surgery at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., A federal district court dismissed Carters claims, relying on the courtsdecision in Feres.
DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district courtdecision that vacated the listing of the Arctic ringed seal as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). In a letter to the court on March 2, the parties asked the court to defer further briefing on the U.S.-based
Justice Sotomayor dissented, writing that she believed the Court’s interpretation would allow defendants to “sidestep” the general bar on appellate review by “shoehorning” a civil rights or federal officer removal argument into their case for removal. They seek a courtdecision setting aside government approvals of the power plant.
The federal courtruled resoundingly in favor of SIFMA, finding for plaintiffs on all counts. Important Decisions to Watch For Several cases that grapple further with these questions of law are fully briefed and awaiting decisions. The outcomes may impact the future of climate-related financial regulations.
EL Paso County , which examined Fourth Amendment protections in the context of abusive strip searches, and Texas v. These rulings illustrate the courts involvement in shaping public policy and addressing complex legal challenges in a politically and socially divided landscape. Affirmation of Lower CourtDecision: 2 points.
Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The Ninth Circuit declined to remand with instructions for dismissal of the underlying action and also declined to vacate any district courtdecisions. Biden , No.
27, the Michigan Supreme Court declined to review a lower-courtdecision that allowed Trump to appear on the state’s primary ballot. As in Minnesota, the lower court’sruling does not foreclose a new challenge to Trump’s appearance on the general election ballot. In a ruling on Dec. And on Dec.
This week, we highlight a number of those petitions the justices are set to consider, seeking review of lower courtdecisions on student-loan forgiveness, the constitutionality of federal agencies, and more. Student-loan forgiveness Another 5th Circuit ruling led to the governments petition in Department of Education v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content