article thumbnail

Canada Federal Court declares cabinet order enabling ban of single-use plastics unconstitutional

JURIST

Moreover, the court found the order unconstitutional, as it had exceeded the federal government’s ability to make criminal law. However, the court did not rule whether Bill S-5’s addition of PMIs to Schedule 1 of CEPA is constitutional.

Court 231
article thumbnail

Guantanamo detainee loses bid to dismiss charges and disqualify judge over conflicts of interest

JURIST

Navy Captain named Kirk Waits presided over the commission before becoming the Deputy Director of the Navy Office of the Judge Advocate General Criminal Law Division of the Department of Defense. A commission was formed in 2014 to handle his case and try him for war crimes and conspiring to commit terrorist attacks.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Double jeopardy claim after inconsistent acquittal comes before the court

SCOTUSBlog

Georgia will take the justices back to law-school basics – the case could be a question on a law-school examination in criminal law. The state courts responded by characterizing the inconsistent verdicts as “repugnant,” vacating both verdicts, and authorizing a second trial on all counts. The facts are simple.

Court 113
article thumbnail

EU dispatch: Greek neo-Nazi party appeal prompts bar association probe as lawyer makes Nazi salutes in court

JURIST

A trial against Golden Dawn commenced in April 2015 at the first instance, and on October 7, 2020, a court decision pronounced party leader Nikos Michaloliakos and all Golden Dawn MPs guilty for involvement in a criminal organisation. We believe in Metaxas and salute in this way”.

Lawyer 137
article thumbnail

Affirmative action cases up first in November argument calendar

SCOTUSBlog

Hendrix (Nov.

article thumbnail

South Africa court dismisses plea to remove prosecutor from Zuma corruption trial

JURIST

In June, Zuma was convicted of contempt of court for 15 months for failing to testify before a judiciary panel. ” The JGZZuma Foundation posted on social media following the high court decision, stating that the decision was a “gross error of law and misdirection,” and that Zuma intends to appeal the decision.

Court 104
article thumbnail

In sequel to McGirt, justices will again review scope of state prosecutorial power in Indian country

SCOTUSBlog

In McGirt , the court determined by a 5-4 vote that the historic Creek Reservation boundaries have continued to exist despite a century-long understanding that the reservation had been terminated by the time Oklahoma earned statehood in 1912. Black-letter federal law provides that, since at least Worcester v.