Court Decisions Delaware Government 
Constitutional Law Reporter
APRIL 11, 2023
In Delaware v. Supreme Court held that uncashed MoneyGram checks are governed by the Disposition of Abandoned Money Orders and Traveler’s Check Act (FDA) and should be returned to the state where they were issued. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. It was Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s first opinion.
Law 360
MAY 29, 2024
After the Delaware Chancery Court's decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters' Pension v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently O
JANUARY 3, 2024
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has begun 2023 with its first precedential patent decision in DexCom, Inc. In an opinion by Judge Stoll, the court affirmed a district court decision denying DexCom’s motion for a preliminary injunction. District Court for the District of Delaware.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MAY 12, 2023
In total, at least 25 cases have been filed in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai’i, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Vermont. Nearly all of the state and local government plaintiffs filed their cases in state court.
FDA Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 29, 2021
Manufacturers may choose not to participate in this program, but the federal government will not reimburse for their outpatient drugs under Medicaid or Medicare Part B if they do not. A 2018 report by the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) found similar issues, as well as contract pharmacy noncompliance and poor federal oversight.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 11, 2020
A Hawaii court held that the Hawai‘i Environmental Policy Act requires environmental review for commercial taking of aquarium fish and that Department of Land and Natural Resources issuance and renewal of licenses for commercial aquarium collection without environmental review was invalid and illegal. In Delaware v. 19-1230 (D.C.
SCOTUSBlog
MARCH 6, 2025
In 1993, William Neilly was sentenced in Michigan state court to life without the possibility of parole for a homicide he committed as a juvenile. Because of intervening Supreme Court decisions prohibiting the imposition of no-parole life sentences for juvenile offenders, he was resentenced to a lesser sentence.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content