Remove Court Decisions Remove Delaware Remove Litigation
article thumbnail

Why A Delaware Supreme Court Decision Affirming Shifting A Contingency Fee To The Losing Party Could Have Applications To Recovering The Costs Of Litigation Funding [Sponsored]

Above The Law

The state’s top court upheld fee-shifting of a contingent fee. Analogous logic could apply to the costs of litigation funding. The post Why A Delaware Supreme Court Decision Affirming Shifting A Contingency Fee To The Losing Party Could Have Applications To Recovering The Costs Of Litigation Funding appeared first on Above the Law.

article thumbnail

Catching Up With Delaware's Chancery Court

Law 360

Delaware Chancery Court decisions last week touched on foot powder litigation, an AMC settlement and in-person signage as damage control for a postponed hearing. New cases ranged from Amazon sales centers to a fibrosis drug.

Court 97
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Courts Are Mimicking Delaware's Approach To Ultra Vires Acts

Law 360

Recent state court decisions mirroring procedures employed by the Delaware Chancery Court to short-circuit the adjudication of disputes concerning ultra vires corporate acts are a welcome sign for parties who are required to litigate their corporate disputes outside of Delaware, say attorneys at Akerman.

Court 40
article thumbnail

The 340B Showdown: HRSA Proceeds Towards Enforcement Despite Litigation

FDA Law Blog

According to AstraZeneca’s court filings, the fines alone would accrue to the tune of $530 million per month. Federal Court Found HRSA’s Advisory Opinion Was Based on Faulty Legal Grounds. As of this writing, the court is still deliberating on the relief to be granted to the manufacturer.

article thumbnail

Collateral Estoppel Beats Precedent Every Time

Patently O

This means that issues decided at the district or administrative court level can be binding on all other courts: district courts, administrative courts, appellate courts, and even the Supreme Court. District court decisions are not binding precedent because they are at the bottom.

article thumbnail

New Rules Have SPACs Down, But Not Dead

Intelligize Blog

SPACs also got some good news recently courtesy of a Delaware Chancery Court decision dismissing claims challenging “de-SPAC” merger disclosures. “Except for a limited number of highly qualified first-time issuers, the clients that we are working with or that we are aware of are qualified, repeat and serial SPAC sponsors.”

article thumbnail

The First Precedential Patent Decision of 2023: Dexcom v. Abbott Diabetes Care

Patently O

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has begun 2023 with its first precedential patent decision in DexCom, Inc. In an opinion by Judge Stoll, the court affirmed a district court decision denying DexCom’s motion for a preliminary injunction. District Court for the District of Delaware.