SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 8, 2025
After the bank failed in 2017, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which became the receiver for the bank, hired a loan servicer, Planet Home Lending, to try to recover some of the money owed to the bank. He was also charged with filing false income tax returns, but those charges are not before the Supreme Court.)
Mondaq
NOVEMBER 3, 2021
The attorney-general has appealed a Supreme Court decision on disclosing bank transactions abroad at a time they were banned during the lead up to the 2013 haircut on deposits
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
CARET Legal
JULY 11, 2024
Coordinating with these various parties can be a logistical nightmare, particularly when trying to schedule meetings, depositions, or court appearances. Imagine a scenario where a crucial witness is not informed of a rescheduled deposition, resulting in a no-show and potentially damaging the case.
OilandGasLawyer
FEBRUARY 18, 2022
The appeal is from a trial court decision in a suit brought by Exxon against these municipalities and others under Rule 202 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. That rule allows a trial court to authorize a deposition either to perpetuate or obtain testimony for use in a potential suit, or to investigate a potential claim or suit.
Paralegal Bootcamp
JULY 24, 2023
Legal research skills Legal research skills are essential for finding and analyzing laws, regulations, and court decisions pertinent to the case you’re working on. Attention to detail is very important for litigation paralegals. Being a proficient legal researcher makes you an invaluable asset to your team.
Patently O
FEBRUARY 1, 2023
The reissue system is a somewhat-close relative to inter partes review and has the benefit of 150 years of case law, including numerous Supreme Court decisions. With reissues, courts have clearly held that cancellation of claims during reissue render those claims entirely moot. See, for instance, Moffitt v. Garr , 66 U.S.
Patently O
NOVEMBER 9, 2021
Judge Markey also wrote a dissent that foreshadowed the eventual Supreme Court decision. After losing before the CCPA, the government then petitioned for Supreme Court review in the name of Marshall Dann, who was President Nixon’s Commissioner of Patents. .” Rather, the court found the claims obvious.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
108 
Let's personalize your content