Court Decisions Diligence Litigating 
Conflict of Laws
JUNE 7, 2022
This post is an abridged adaptation of my recent article, Private International Law and Substantive Liability Issues in Tort Litigation against Multinational Companies in the English Courts: Recent UK Supreme Court Decisions and Post-Brexit Implications in the Journal of Private International Law.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 12, 2024
In particular, the Court found that it could not impose a concrete minimum emission reduction target on Shell. This blog post explains some of the key takeaways from the appeal, highlighting some critical ground rules laid down by the court which may serve future litigation and several key challenges.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
FDA Law Blog
DECEMBER 7, 2023
Gonzalez — The annual Enforcement, Litigation, and Compliance Conference put on by the Food and Drug Law Institute (“FDLI”) took place in Washington this week. FTC Supreme Court decision stripping FTC of its ability to obtain restitution or disgorgement under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. By Steven J.
Conflict of Laws
JUNE 1, 2024
Alex Mills, Sustainability and jurisdiction in the international civil litigation market The sustainability of the global economy, particularly in response to the concerns of climate change, is an issue which impacts many different aspects of life and work around the world.
Conflict of Laws
FEBRUARY 26, 2025
Based on a litigation agreement pursuant to Sections 119b (2), 184a (3) of the German Courts Constitution Act on the first instance jurisdiction of the Commercial Court and on the conduct of proceedings in English, the article analyses details of the newly created procedural instruments and their implementation in practice.
Constitutional Law Reporter
FEBRUARY 16, 2023
Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote on behalf of the Court. In reaching its decision, the Court explained that equitable tolling “effectively extends an otherwise discrete limitations period set by Congress” when a litigant diligently pursues his rights but extraordinary circumstances prevent him from bringing a timely action.
JonathanTurley
MARCH 24, 2022
As I noted later, that is a bizarre take since all but one of those decisions were trial court decisions. As with prior nominations, I read as many as I could to do due diligence as a legal commentator. As a trial judge, Jackson was required to follow not just the precedent of the Supreme Court but the appellate court.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
75 
Let's personalize your content