Remove Court Decisions Remove District of Columbia Remove Statute
article thumbnail

US appeals court upholds decision finding Pennsylvania statutes restricting youth gun possession unconstitutional

JURIST

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld its previous decision on Tuesday which found Pennsylvania statutes preventing “18-to-20-year-olds from carrying firearms outside their homes during a state of emergency” unconstitutional. ” The court then explained that in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn, Inc.

Statute 253
article thumbnail

Supreme Court likely to let vape company’s FDA challenge proceed

SCOTUSBlog

Suri told the justices that this was not a question of convenience, but instead about Congresss choice in the statute to delineate where cases can be brought. A decision in the case is expected by summer. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.

Court 87
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

D.C. Circuit Sides with Manufacturers in Latest 340B Contract Pharmacy Case

FDA Law Blog

Kirschenbaum — Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act does not prohibit pharmaceutical manufacturers from imposing conditions on the distribution of discounted drugs to covered entities in the program. By Sophia R. Gaulkin & Alan M.

article thumbnail

Restoring the Founders’ right to bear arms

SCOTUSBlog

By the time Bruen was decided, with few exceptions, the lower courts had essentially limited the Second Amendment to protecting the possession of handguns in the home — the narrowest possible reading of District of Columbia v. Heller , which struck down prohibitions on handguns and functional firearms in the home.

article thumbnail

December 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Federal Court Found Flaws in New Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. The federal district court for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Federal Court Said NOAA Justified Redaction of Communications Between Climate Scientist and White House During Obama Administration.

Court 59
article thumbnail

July 2017 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Circuit also rejected EPA’s argument that the court did not have authority to review stays issued under Section 307(d)(7)(D) of the Clean Air Act. Thirteen states, the District of Columbia, and the City of Chicago sought leave to intervene on behalf of the petitioners. Department of the Interior Secretarial Order No.

Court 40
article thumbnail

Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question

SCOTUSBlog

A federal district court in D.C. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed, concluding that federal recognition is a term of art that applies only to tribes that appear on the bureau’s annual list, which excludes Alaska Native corporations. sided with the Treasury Department, but the U.S.