Remove Court Decisions Remove Divorce Remove Tort
article thumbnail

Review of Afifah Kusumadara, Indonesian Private International Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2021, 288 pp, hb $140

Conflict of Laws

Pereira (Supreme Court decision 376 K/Pdt. Indonesian legislation and court practice generally uphold the principle of party autonomy. The chapter further discusses the law applicable to specific torts, including negligence, nuisance, wrongful interference with goods, defamation, and environmental damage and pollution.

Laws 59
article thumbnail

First Issue of Journal of Private International Law for 2022

Conflict of Laws

F Rielaender, “Financial torts and EU private international law: will the search for the place of “financial damage” ever come to an end?” This article assesses these decisions and their significance for transnational corporate accountability.

Laws 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

25th Volume of the Japanese Yearbook of Private International Law (2023)

Conflict of Laws

In particular, it examines the recognition of ancillary judgments in divorce cases, concluding that they fall under article 118 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The study examines European court decisions, domestic legislation, and international projects aimed at stabilizing the legal status of such children.

Laws 59
article thumbnail

Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 3/2021: Abstracts

Conflict of Laws

Thirdly, by considering the impact on the UK’s and the EU’s relationships with third countries, with particular reference to the 2007 Lugano Convention and Hague Choice of Court Convention. The principal focus will be on questions of jurisdiction, the recognition and enforcement of judgments and choice of law for contract and tort.

article thumbnail

In a slew of new cases, the justices take in closer look

SCOTUSBlog

He argued that the majoritys test was divorced from the [Second Amendments] historic scope and accused the majority of cherry-pick[ing] various regulations from the historical record to piece together an implausible reading of our Nations historical tradition of firearms regulation. Judicial factfinding for restitution Under Apprendi v.

Tort 112