Court Decisions Drafting Statute 
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 24, 2025
When Suri responded no, she suggested that Congress could have simply drafted the law to refer to the applicant instead, and she noted that Congress had done exactly that for a different provision, involving judicial review for decisions requiring the withdrawal of tobacco products from the market.
Hoban Law Group
APRIL 13, 2021
Recent developments have made it even more attractive — for example, the basis for the argument of unconstitutionality of §280E has recently and ably been outlined by the judiciary in three dissenting opinions to a 2019 Tax Court decision (For a summary, see: [link] ).
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
At the Lectern
MAY 5, 2022
Supreme Court draft opinion in a pending, exceptionally high-profile case has me considering leaks from California’s high court. Neither involved the disclosure of a draft opinion’s full text, just the bottom line of an impending decision. The extraordinary publication of a U.S. I can think of two.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 27, 2022
Animal Legal Defense Fund , involving the constitutionality of a Kansas statute criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. McCall , the other case raising the issue, which the court will now hold pending the outcome of Mallory. Next up is Bartenwerfer v.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 16, 2021
They further claim that subsequent statutes, federal agencies and appeals court decisions have all already recognized the corporations as entities eligible for federal contracting under the ISDA. They further argue that Alaskan Natives’ health care needs have been, and will continue to be, met by regional tribal nonprofits.
Constitutional Law Reporter
MARCH 20, 2025
Supreme Court held that alleging commingling of funds alone cannot satisfy the commercial nexus requirement of the expropriation exception of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA). The Courts decision was unanimous. Supreme Courts Decision The Supreme Court disagreed.
Patently O
NOVEMBER 9, 2021
Judge Markey also wrote a dissent that foreshadowed the eventual Supreme Court decision. After losing before the CCPA, the government then petitioned for Supreme Court review in the name of Marshall Dann, who was President Nixon’s Commissioner of Patents. Rather, the court found the claims obvious. John Deere Co. ,
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
100 
Let's personalize your content