Remove Court Decisions Remove Drafting Remove Texas
article thumbnail

Supreme Court likely to let vape company’s FDA challenge proceed

SCOTUSBlog

Reynolds Vapor Company and a group of retailers based in Texas and Mississippi, primarily fielded questions from just two justices, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson a promising sign for his clients. The question comes to the court as part of the FDAs efforts to regulate the multibillion-dollar vaping industry. (The

Court 100
article thumbnail

California dispatches: Newsom ‘pulls a Texas’ on guns in response to Supreme Court stance on SB8 heartbeat bill

JURIST

This tit-for-tat directive against Texas SB8 is the latest of the bold moves Newsom has taken and responds directly to the Supreme Court decision last week. JURIST Operations Director Ram Eachambadi files this report from Los Angeles.

Court 208
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

December 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The court concluded that the Freedom of Information Act’s deliberative process privilege shielded the redactions from disclosure. In October, the federal district court for the Eastern District of Texas denied the plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction. Optimus Steel, LLC v. Army Corps of Engineers , No.

Court 59
article thumbnail

Private rights of action, overtime pay, and the constitutionality of a billboard tax

SCOTUSBlog

It’s a little surprising the court let stand a federal court decision invalidating a state statute on constitutional grounds, but animal-rights groups defending that decision argued persuasively that state statutes are in a state of flux and it would be premature for the justices to take up the case now. Texas , 21-6001.

Statute 96
article thumbnail

“Supreme Court Allows Challenge to Texas Abortion Law but Leaves It in Effect; The law, which bans most abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy, was drafted to evade review in federal court and has been in effect since September”

HowAppealing

“Supreme Court Allows Challenge to Texas Abortion Law but Leaves It in Effect; The law, which bans most abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy, was drafted to evade review in federal court and has been in effect since September”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. ” David G.

Drafting 100
article thumbnail

Send Lawyers, Guns, and Money: Newsom Calls For Gun Ban Modeled on Texas Abortion Law

JonathanTurley

Gavin Newsom thrilled many this weekend by saying that his administration will model a new law on Texas’ abortion ban that would let private citizens sue anyone who makes or sells assault weapons or ghost guns. Newsom denounced the Supreme Court in Women’s Health v. In the recent decision in Chief Justice John Roberts noted that.

Laws 58
article thumbnail

October 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Federal Court Denied Preliminary Injunction in Steel Mill Owner’s Pipeline Challenge. The federal district court for the Eastern District of Texas denied a steel mill owner’s motion for a preliminary injunction barring construction of a gas pipeline that will cross the plaintiff’s property. Wheeler , No. 20-1363 (D.C.

Court 72