Remove Court Decisions Remove Entertainment Remove Litigating
article thumbnail

The Briefing – Andy Warhol’s Prince Prints: Not Fair Use!? (Part Two)

The IP Law Blog

In this week’s episode, Josh Escovedo and Scott Hervey discuss an update to the litigation over Andy Warhol’s series of portraits of the artist Prince ( Andy Warhol Foundation v Goldsmith). That decision overturned a lower court decision in favor of the Warhol Foundation.

article thumbnail

The Briefing – Andy Warhol’s Prince Prints: Not Fair Use!? (Part One)

The IP Law Blog

In this week’s episode, Josh Escovedo and Scott Hervey discuss the litigation over Andy Warhol’s series of portraits of the artist Prince ( Andy Warhol Foundation v Goldsmith ). The decision overturned a lower court decision in favor of the Warhol Foundation.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SCOTUS Rules Quiet Title Act’s Time Bar Is Claim-Processing Rule

Constitutional Law Reporter

In reaching its decision, the Court noted the important distinction between “the classes of cases a court may entertain (subject-matter jurisdiction)” and “nonjurisdictional claim-processing rules, which seek to promote the orderly progress of litigation by requiring that the parties take certain procedural steps at certain specified times.”

Statute 52
article thumbnail

The Nigerian Court of Appeal declines to enforce a Commonwealth of Virginia (in USA) Choice of Court Agreement

Conflict of Laws

Talking about the jurisdiction of the Courts, the Court below, by virtue of Section 272 of the Constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) has jurisdiction to entertain cases such as recovery of debts, as in the instant case on appeal. 6] First, the Court of Appeal (Hussaini JCA) in A.B.U. Conclusion.

Court 52
article thumbnail

Flo and Eddie NY Suit on Pre-1972 Sound Recordings Ordered Dismissed By Court of Appeals – No Issues with Copies Made in the Transmission Process

Broadcast Law Blog

This week’s federal Court of Appeals order was very direct, relying on the state court decision that there was no public performance right to end the case.

Court 40
article thumbnail

The late-May calendar is another 9-case blockbuster

At the Lectern

In March of this year, the court heard argument in another COVID insurance case, Another Planet Entertainment, LLC v. Vigilant Insurance Co. with an opinion expected by June 3. Sundance, Inc. 2022) _ U.S. _ [142 S.Ct.

article thumbnail

Understanding the Murky State of the Performance Right in Pre-1972 Sound Recordings – Florida Court Rejects the Right yet Sirius XM Settles With the Record Labels

Broadcast Law Blog

It may mean that Sirius was tired of the litigation, and wanted to buy peace, at least with the major labels. The litigation may also have been interfering with other business between the company and the labels, so peace may have brought some security. What does this settlement mean?

Court 40