This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Execution Court granted the petition and ordered the enforcement of the English judgment. The decision was confirmed on appeal. 2) The foreign judgment is contrary to public policy because it violates Islamic Sharia law, individual property rights and the distribution of property under UAE law. Y appealed to the DSC.
Comments: Sources of Law It should be indicated from the outset that in Bahrain, rules governing international jurisdiction are primarily found in the Code of Civil and Commercial Procedure of 1971 (hereafter referred to as “CCCP,” articles 14-20). Regarding choice of law rules, those concerning familylaw and successions (i.e.,
Building on the comments, the present article authored by the members of the Marburg Group focuses on the main points of critique and considers the present state of discussion on the proposed Regulation. Rüsing: Dialogue International FamilyLaw, 28th – 29th April, Münster, Germany. Notifications: C.
Professor Martin Gebauer (University of Tbingen) explored three main themes: striking parallels in time and content, strong contrasts, and finally the tensions in characterisation. In this context, he explained the international framework for contracts in international familylaw by exploring the EU and HCCH rules.
In its decision of 11 March 2021, the Cologne Higher Regional Court denied the international jurisdiction of the Cologne courts for permission proceedings under the German Telemedia Act (TMG) in cases of suspected abusive customer complaints in online marketplaces. The starting point is the fraudulent car purchase.
Introduction In a previous post , I reported and commented on a decision rendered by the Abu Dhabi Supreme Court (hereinafter “ADSC”) in which the Court addressed the issue of the applicability of the Abu Dhabi Civil Marriage Law (Law No. Comments Two main issues deserve to be particularly highlighted here.
In this sense, the proposal covers the three main pillars of private international law and it will also introduce a European Certificate on Parenthood. It covers not only the recognition of judgments but also the recognition and acceptance of authentic instruments. What is next?
The decision of the OLG München (Higher Regional Court of Munich) regarding a brokerage contract shows that it is not always possible to determine the place of main performance. Hau: International jurisdiction based on nationality in European familylaw. In the EU, the Succession Regulation No.
In response, the father contested the petition on two main grounds. The Court also noted that the medical reports submitted did not provide evidence of mistreatment. The petition followed an official communication from the Ministry of Justice to the Office of the Public Prosecutor.
Underlying Facts X, a Bangladeshi citizen who also appears to have also a US citizenship, and Y, a Japanese citizen, met each other in Japan where they got married in 2008 according to the forms prescribed under Japanese law. The High Court, however, did not address this issue. Their marriage resulted in the birth of three daughters.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content