This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Thursday filed a lawsuit in Georgia, claiming that the state’s newly-drawn state House and Senate districts disadvantage Black voters. ” Six plaintiffs brought the suit against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.
The European Court of Human Rights ruled on Thursday that Georgia and Azerbaijan violated the rights of Azerbaijani journalist Afghan Mukhtarli, specifically his right to an effective investigation and his right to private life. He was eventually released in March 2020.
Supreme Court will soon decide whether to hear a case challenging a Georgia law requiring capital defendants seeking to be spared execution to prove they are intellectually disabled beyond a reasonable doubt, a standard that the law’s initial drafters say was written in error, reports the New York Times.
.” Kennedy brought the case to the district court claiming the school district violated his First Amendment right of free speech. The district court ruled in favor of the that the school district. Kennedy appealed the district courtdecision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld the decision.
Courts in other states had rejected that argument (see our articles on decisions in New York , Florida and Georgia ), but the question of the status of the law remained unresolved in California.
The Preamble We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
The nation asserts that the city lacks criminal jurisdiction over Native Americans on the tribe’s lands without express congressional authorization, as per the 2020 US Supreme Court case McGirt v. The Muscogee Creek Tribe is originally from an area straddling the border between what is now Georgia and Alabama.
Georgia will take the justices back to law-school basics – the case could be a question on a law-school examination in criminal law. Because that is what happened here, he says, the decision of the Georgia Supreme Court should be reversed. Share Tuesday’s argument in McElrath v. The facts are simple. Period, full stop.
Georgia, by contrast, argues that Nance must bring the Eighth Amendment claim under the federal habeas statutes. Georgia argues that Nance’s lethal injection challenge is Heck -barred, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit took that position below — “reconstruing” Nance’s Section 1983 complaint as a habeas petition.
Recent state supreme courtdecisions from New York, New Mexico, Pennsylvania and Georgia implicate whether a corporate defendant will be subject to suit for claims unconnected to a state merely for registering to do business there, and the tension between the Georgia Supreme Court'sdecision and settled precedent means the issue may be before the U.S. (..)
Georgia , 601 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the State of Georgia can’t retry a defendant acquitted of murder by reason of insanity. The court vacated both the malice-murder and felony-murder verdicts pursuant to Georgia’s so-called repugnancy doctrine, and authorized retrial. Supreme Court.
Some older Supreme Courtdecisions support that theory of consent. Some courts read [Supreme Court precedent] as effectively foreclosing [this consent-by-registration theory of jurisdiction], while others insist it remains viable.”. In Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v.
The GeorgiaCourt of Appeals' recent vacating of a lower court'sdecision to set aside a default judgment against Samsung Electronics America is a reminder of the processes and arguments provided by Georgia's statutes for challenging default judgments — including the importance of responding quickly, says Katy Robertson at Swift Currie.
A Georgia federal judge on Monday denied the Federal Trade Commission's bid to pause or dismiss its $550 million consumer deception case against FleetCor Technologies Inc. Supreme Courtdecision curbed the agency's authority, saying the "most equitable course" is to decide the merits in court. after a U.S.
My research on capital punishment suggests that both the arguments of today’s abolitionists and the current stalemate can be traced back half a century to the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in a landmark death penalty case: Furman v. Four years after Furman, the death penalty was back before the Supreme Court. Austin Sarat.
Cortada is a longtime Floridian who received his law degree from the University of Miami and is now a professor at the University of Miami Department of Art and Art History; his work combines his legal training with his artistic vision of how each Supreme Courtdecision shaped the nation. Florida , a companion case to Gregg v.
In most states, those suits have been dismissed with courts finding that state law did not provide for a performance right in these pre-1972 recordings (see our articles about decisions in New York , Florida and Georgia reaching that conclusion). The issue in California, however, is still open.
This week, a court in Georgia became the latest to declare such laws unconstitutional. The case was brought by journalist Abby Martin who was denied a contract as a keynote speaker at Georgia Southern University due to her support of the BDS movement. In a 2-1 panel decision, the court also found that the was overly broad.
This case reached the Florida Supreme Court when it was certified by the United State Court of Appeals which was reviewing a District Courtdecision reaching the same conclusion as did the Florida Supreme Court – that there was no performance right under state law for pre-1972 sound recordings (see our summary of the District Courtdecision here ).
Georgia in 1832, states cannot prosecute crimes committed on Indian reservation land without federal approval. But Congress never terminated the reservation, nor did it authorize Oklahoma to enforce its criminal laws on the reservation. Black-letter federal law provides that, since at least Worcester v.
These rates were calculated by dividing (1) the total number of cases where a clause was enforced by (2) the total number of cases where the court considered the issue of enforceability. The state courts in Florida and Connecticut have become more likely to enforce in recent years. They apply federal common law.
The Supreme Court of Georgia Wednesday reinstated the state’s six-week abortion ban after a lower court found the 2019 act unconstitutional on November 15. In a one-page order, the court granted the state’s request to stay the lower courtdecision. Wade in their decision.
The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Wednesday held that Georgia’s abortion law can take effect immediately. The Georgia law bans abortions when fetal cardiac activity is detected, as early as six weeks. A US federal district court previously blocked the law from going into effect in 2020.
The Georgia Supreme Court upheld the state’s six-week abortion ban on Tuesday, voiding certain provisions of the Living Infants Fairness and Equality (LIFE) Act. The LIFE Act established certain limitations and provisions surrounding access to abortion within the state of Georgia.
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of claims by Allco Finance Limited (Allco) that federal law preempted Connecticut’s renewable energy solicitations and that Connecticut’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) program violated the dormant Commerce Clause. ADDITION TO THE NON-U.S. CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART.
In Georgia, medical costs for the elderly population in Georgia corrections facilities was nearly nine times the cost of care for nonelderly people in the system. Report authors highlighted a recent Supreme Courtdecision in Canada.
Henderson was the first federal courtdecision in the country that held “confinement for long periods of time without the opportunity for regular outdoor exercise does, as a matter of law, constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.” Supreme Court’s 1972 Furman v.
The US Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals declined Tuesday to rehear with the full Eighth Circuit panel of judges a prior appeals courtdecision curtailing private organizations’ ability to sue under section two of the Voting Rights Act for alleged racial gerrymandering in redistricting decisions.
We’d all been working for over a year on a contract that would make it possible, someday in the future, for everyone to have free and open access to all the official courtdecisions ever published in the United States. state and federal courtdecisions representing the bulk of our nation’s common law. This was not easy.
The Georgia Supreme Court concluded that the shackles had little effect on the jury in light of the evidence of Whatley’s dangerousness, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, by a 2-1 vote, held that conclusion was not unreasonable. Last up is Allen v.
In an article for Woodward Academy, a private school in Georgia that O’Brien attended, he reflected on his early days as a Supreme Court reporter: There was no internet in those days, nor even cable television. And I had their ear, explaining Supreme Courtdecisions on a regular basis over many years.
Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday appointed two outside attorneys to defend the lower-courtdecisions in two cases in which the federal government has declined to do so. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar conceded, the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit was incorrect.
The court rejected a petition for review filed by Frederick Whatley , who was convicted of murder in connection with an armed robbery in Georgia. There is no deadline for the acting solicitor general to file her brief. Whatley argued that U.S.
Because USCIS was aware that Patel had previously checked a box on a Georgia driver’s license application falsely stating that he was a United States citizen, it denied Patel’s application for failure to satisfy the threshold requirement that the noncitizen be statutorily admissible for permanent residence.
Under the Supreme Courtdecision Allen v. Rights groups have recently challenged redistricting maps in Georgia , Tennessee , North Dakota , Louisiana , Alabama , and South Carolina. Milligan , states are required to consider racial criteria when redistricting to avoid diluting the voting power of protected groups.
However, putting aside the basis for the decision, it helped stabilize our system. Jackson wrote in a 1953 Supreme Courtdecision , “We are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final.”. Some early Americans declared they would simply defy what the court ruled after Marbury.
Decision The Ninth Circuit reversed the district courtsdecision to dismiss the Unruh Act claim, ruling that the federal court should have kept jurisdiction over it. The court noted that the claim was already largely resolved by the ADA ruling, and sending it to state court would be inefficient and unnecessary.
Missouri Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a preliminary injunction on Tuesday, which blocks former President Joe Biden’s student debt relief plan from taking effect. The plaintiffs in the case are the states of Missouri, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, North Dakota, Ohio, and Oklahoma.
The former US Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia B. He also testified that in all of the courtdecisions he reviewed regarding Trump’s claims, the Trump campaign did not make cogent claims of fraud.
In 2022, Georgia officials rebuffed a challenge to U.S. 27, the Michigan Supreme Court declined to review a lower-courtdecision that allowed Trump to appear on the state’s primary ballot. As in Minnesota, the lower court’s ruling does not foreclose a new challenge to Trump’s appearance on the general election ballot.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content