This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
United States that in order to constitute aggravated identity theft, the use of a person’s identity must be at the “crux” of what makes the conduct criminal, reversing a lower courtdecision. The government also applied a sentence enhancement under 18 U.S.C.
The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Tuesday reversed insider trading convictions against four defendants over leaks from a US healthcare agency. The 2018 convictions were called for reconsideration following the 2020 US Supreme Courtdecision in Kelly v. million in profits from this scheme.
Last month the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’sdecision to dismiss a False Claims Act (FCA) ( 21 U.S.C In addition, Grifols’s eligibility for government contracts is conditioned on FDA approval of Gamunex and FDA approval is conditioned on compliance with GMPs.
The Supreme Court of India Friday dismissed a plea challenging the Caste Census initiated in the Indian state of Bihar. By terming the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) a “Publicity Interest Litigation,” the Supreme Court lent its tacit approval to the caste census.
The court found that the government would not be able defend the order, considering the amount of time that it took to initiate the order and the lack of consultation with members of affected communities. The court noted concerns about the loss of healthcare workers who could potentially quit over the vaccine mandate.
Facts of the Case Petitioner David Dubin was convicted of healthcare fraud under 18 U.S.C. The issue before the Court was whether, in defrauding Medicaid, he also committed “[a]ggravated identity theft” under 18 U.S.C. 1347 after he overbilled Medicaid for psychological testing performed by the company he helped manage. 1028A(a)(1).
Kirschenbaum — In 2017, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued a final rule to significantly decrease the rate the government will reimburse 340B hospitals in 2018 for outpatient prescription drugs from average sales price (“ASP”) plus 6% to ASP minus 22.5%. By Faraz Siddiqui & Alan M. 52494 (Nov.
The case emerged from complaints by Nebraskans that the state was improperly subjecting mental health patients to segregation from general society, in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and the 1999 US Supreme Courtdecision Olmstead v.
The Supreme Court of Georgia Wednesday reinstated the state’s six-week abortion ban after a lower court found the 2019 act unconstitutional on November 15. In a one-page order, the court granted the state’s request to stay the lower courtdecision. Wade in their decision. The lower court reasoned that Roe v.
Representing the federal government, Kyle Hawkins told the justices that their cases emphasized that rights-creating statutes are atypical. Sotomayor pressed Hawkins, observing that the federal government for two decades had contended that the any qualified provider provision could be privately enforced through federal civil rights laws.
Supreme Court held that two States and five individual social-media users who sued dozens of Executive Branch officials and agencies, alleging that the Government pressured the platforms to censor their speech in violation of the First Amendment, lacked Article III standing to bring their suits. _ (2024), the U.S.
On appeal, he raised the same claim as Porat, arguing that the schemes did not constitute mail or wire fraud because they were not intended to cause economic harm, and he also argued that because the DBE’s involvement was intangible, Kousisis and Alpha did not actually defraud the government of any “property,” as federal law requires.
Although the government agrees that the categorical approach applies here, it argues that, based on the actual facts of the case, the 2nd Circuit’s decision is correct. In an unusual move, the United States filed a brief supporting further review. relisted after the Jan. 26, May 9, May 16 and May 23 conferences) L.W.
In its brief in the Supreme Court, Catholic Charities tells the justices that Wisconsins effort to pick and choose among religious groups and carve out works of mercy from the realm of the religious altogether thus violates the Constitution three times over. Catholic Charities misconstrues the Wisconsin Supreme Courtsdecision.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed, ruling that the 50% tariff was part of an ongoing plan of action that Trump had properly initiated earlier. United States.
The court has used Chevron at least 70 times to decide cases but has not done so since 2016. Consequently, the latest Supreme Court ruling could impact various regulations regarding the environment, government benefit programs, healthcare, consumer safety, nuclear energy, and guns.
Until 2020, the horse-racing industry was governed primarily by the states, resulting in a patchwork of differing regulations. The district court dismissed both claims. The authority noted that the FTC has the power both to stop enforcement actions by the authority and to review decisions once they are made. 10 conference.)
Justice Barrett : 929 words Justice Barretts questioning primarily sought to clarify legal nuances surrounding the conscience protections for healthcare workers, the standing of associations in legal challenges, and the implications of regulations related to abortion and its associated medical procedures.
While largely believed to be an apolitical institution of the tripartite United States government, the Supreme Court has always been influenced by personal politics and the “flavor of the day.” ” Despite this, the average US citizen has generally seen the Court as an independent and reliable arbiter.
The justices declined to decide whether to limit or overrule its 1950 decision in Feres v. United States , which bars members of the military for suing the federal government for injuries that arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to military service. The justices will hold another conference on Friday, Feb.
Some of the most significant areas include: Regulatory Changes The deregulatory agenda in healthcare, finance, and environmental law has introduced significant uncertainty. Trumps executive order limited access to government resources sending shockwaves throughout the legal profession. It is without precedent.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content