Remove Court Decisions Remove Government Remove Laws Remove Statute
article thumbnail

2 New Jersey Journalists Face Criminal Charges for Publishing Information From a Police Blotter

The Volokh Conspiracy

Failure to immediately correct and apologize for this inexplicable error would put prosecutors' competence in doubt and warrant investigation of whether they should keep their law licenses." The asserted state interest cannot justify the statute's imposition of criminal sanctions on this type of publication." In the 1979 case Smith v.

Statute 141
article thumbnail

SCOTUS Holds Wire Fraud Statute Doesn’t Require Proof Victim Suffered Economic Loss

Constitutional Law Reporter

The Government charged Alpha and Kousisis with wire fraud and conspiracy to commit the same pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Thus, the Government could not prove that they had schemed to defraud PennDOT of “money or property” as §1343 requires. The Court next turned to Supreme Court cases interpreting the wire fraud statute.

Statute 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SCOTUS Holds Wire Fraud Statute Doesn’t Require Proof Victim Suffered Economic Loss

Constitutional Law Reporter

The Government charged Alpha and Kousisis with wire fraud and conspiracy to commit the same pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Thus, the Government could not prove that they had schemed to defraud PennDOT of “money or property” as §1343 requires. The Court next turned to Supreme Court cases interpreting the wire fraud statute.

Statute 52
article thumbnail

Court takes up New York man’s bid for compassionate release

SCOTUSBlog

The government appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, which reversed the district courts decision. The court of appeals interpreted Fernandezs argument that he is potentially innocent as a challenge to the validity of his conviction. The federal government urged the justices to deny review.

Court 127
article thumbnail

Only named defendants’ profits can be awarded in trademark suit, justices rule

SCOTUSBlog

Justice Elena Kagans succinct opinion for a unanimous court squarely rejected the lower courts approach, ruling that profits only of the named defendant can be awarded. The problem, though, Kagan explained, is that this is not a tenable take on the decisions below, which never considered that portion of the statute.

Statute 78
article thumbnail

Heir to Chicago political dynasty brings his “false statement” charges to Supreme Court

SCOTUSBlog

Thompson used the money to make an equity contribution to the law firm where he had just become a partner, to pay off a tax bill, and to repay money that he owed a different bank, but he did not sign any paperwork for the second and third loans.

Court 105
article thumbnail

Supreme Court likely to let vape company’s FDA challenge proceed

SCOTUSBlog

In 2016, the FDA issued a rule indicating that the law applies to e-cigarettes and e-liquids. Suri countered that the provision merely directs courts to determine, based on the laws structure, who is adversely affected. Along with Sotomayor, Jackson was the only other justice who appeared sympathetic to the governments position.

Court 96