This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Failure to immediately correct and apologize for this inexplicable error would put prosecutors' competence in doubt and warrant investigation of whether they should keep their law licenses." The asserted state interest cannot justify the statute's imposition of criminal sanctions on this type of publication." In the 1979 case Smith v.
The Government charged Alpha and Kousisis with wire fraud and conspiracy to commit the same pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Thus, the Government could not prove that they had schemed to defraud PennDOT of “money or property” as §1343 requires. The Court next turned to Supreme Court cases interpreting the wire fraud statute.
The Government charged Alpha and Kousisis with wire fraud and conspiracy to commit the same pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Thus, the Government could not prove that they had schemed to defraud PennDOT of “money or property” as §1343 requires. The Court next turned to Supreme Court cases interpreting the wire fraud statute.
The government appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, which reversed the district courtsdecision. The court of appeals interpreted Fernandezs argument that he is potentially innocent as a challenge to the validity of his conviction. The federal government urged the justices to deny review.
Justice Elena Kagans succinct opinion for a unanimous court squarely rejected the lower courts approach, ruling that profits only of the named defendant can be awarded. The problem, though, Kagan explained, is that this is not a tenable take on the decisions below, which never considered that portion of the statute.
Thompson used the money to make an equity contribution to the law firm where he had just become a partner, to pay off a tax bill, and to repay money that he owed a different bank, but he did not sign any paperwork for the second and third loans.
In 2016, the FDA issued a rule indicating that the law applies to e-cigarettes and e-liquids. Suri countered that the provision merely directs courts to determine, based on the laws structure, who is adversely affected. Along with Sotomayor, Jackson was the only other justice who appeared sympathetic to the governments position.
Last Friday, December 20, 2024, the Sabin Center submitted an amicus brief to the New York State Court of Appeals the states highest court in support of the City of New York in Glen Oaks Village Owners, Inc., City of New York began in 2022, when a group of cooperative apartment owners filed suit seeking to invalidate Local Law 97.
The Supreme Court'sdecision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County was an important step toward reorienting enforcement and implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in line with the actual text of the statute. Last month, however, the Supreme Court took notice.
In Christian , New York's attorney argued that "if 99% of a law is unconstitutional, but is 1% ok," it is valid because it has a constitutional application. But the question is whether the law at issue , not some other actual or theoretical law, can be constitutionally applied based upon the historical record supplied by the government.
Share A trade group for the adult entertainment industry will appear at the Supreme Court on Wednesday in its challenge to a Texas law that requires pornography sites to verify the age of their users before providing access for example, by requiring a government-issued identification. 1181, in June 2023. Senior U.S.
Supreme Court held that the Mexican government can’t hold gun manufacturers liable for aiding and abetting gun trafficking and drug cartels that have injured Mexico. Facts of the Case The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) bars certain lawsuits against manufacturers and sellers of firearms.
In this article, I analyze all 104 closely divided Supreme Courtdecisions from 2020 onwardthe Barrett eraeach decided by either a 54 or 63 vote. These variables were one-hot encoded and combined with the text vectors to produce fused clusters: data-driven issue areas informed by both language and law.
Although Roberts did not mention any of the hostile foreign state actors responsible for such disinformation by name, the justices will hear oral arguments next week in a challenge to a federal law that would require social media giant TikTok to shut down in the United States unless its parent company can sell it off by Jan.
The Supreme Court. (NA) NA) Today's 6-3 Supreme Courtdecision in Trump v. 78, and still today, this statute "is what authorizes the federal courts to issue equitable remedies," S. at 111–112 (opinion of the Court). barring nationwide injunctions is a grave mistake. in equity," §11, 1 Stat. Bray & E.
Rule 23 is the provision of federal lawgoverning such class action litigation. Perhaps the best way to understand what's going on with it is by first revisiting the concurring opinion written in the nationwide injunctions case last month by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. "In
In 1993, William Neilly was sentenced in Michigan state court to life without the possibility of parole for a homicide he committed as a juvenile. Because of intervening Supreme Courtdecisions prohibiting the imposition of no-parole life sentences for juvenile offenders, he was resentenced to a lesser sentence.
Federal court rulings on the merits, they wrote, regardless of outcome, promote public confidence that federal elections are being conducted fairly, with integrity, and in accordance with the law. But the Court does not grant review to correct factbound errors, it emphasized and in any event, the lower courtsdecision was correct.
At a recent Columbia Law School colloquium, jointly sponsored by the Sabin Center and the Millstein Center, participants posed a foundational question: How do corporate law standards of fiduciary duty relate to what scientists call the climate emergency? [1] 5] Approximately two-thirds of U.S. 5] Approximately two-thirds of U.S.
The Supreme Court is making good progress in sorting through the current relists. United States , involving the scope of a statute that gives judges discretion to reduce criminal sentences for extraordinary and compelling reasons. Government contractors defenses to torts The GEO Group, Inc. This week it disposed of four.
Until 2020, the horse-racing industry was governed primarily by the states, resulting in a patchwork of differing regulations. But in response to legal challenges, Congress amended the law in 2022 to give the FTC the power to make changes to the authoritys rules. The district court dismissed both claims.
This post is part of a new Climate Law Blog series, 100 Days of Trump 2.0 , in which the Sabin Center offers reflections on the first hundred days of President Trumps second term across a variety of climate-related topics. Third: positive environmental justice decisions are still coming down in the courts.
Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday was divided over whether Planned Parenthood has a legal right under federal civil rights laws to challenge the order by South Carolinas governor barring abortion clinics, including Planned Parenthood, from participating in Medicaid. Federal law generally bars the use of Medicaid funds for abortions.
The Oklahoma charter school board that approved the Catholic schools application tells the justices that a state supreme court ruling invalidating its contract with the school violates the Constitution and harms lower-income families. The state supreme court granted that request. It concluded that St.
The court had asked the Trump administration for its views in the case, and the federal government had recommended that review be granted. The court also rebuffed the challengers’ argument that under the Supreme Court’s 1970 decision in Pike v. In FS Credit Corp. There is no deadline for the U.S. After the U.S.
There is plenty of commentary making the rounds regarding yesterdays 5-4 Supreme Courtdecision confirming that of course a judge can issue a Temporary Restraining Order to maintain the status quo and require USAID pay out the money that it owes to contractors for work already done. Musk freezing the payouts violated the law.
The case comes two years after the Supreme Courtsdecision in Students for Fair Admissions v. More recently, the Trump administration has dismantled or challenged diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives known as DEI — in the federal government and other workplaces. For her sexual orientation claim, the U.S.
citizens to anyone who has not “passed all background checks and security clearances and taken all information security training called for in federal statutes and Treasury Department regulations” and ordered any such person who has already copied that data to delete it pending the full hearing on February 14. It’s Q.E.D.
AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition , where she sided with Chief Justice John Roberts and the Courts liberal bloc to reject former President Donald Trumps attempt to freeze nearly $2 billion in foreign aid, has ignited a firestorm of criticism from the MAGA movement and right-wing commentators. In Becerra v. Texas (2021) and Ohio v.
Konan sued the USPS under the Federal Tort Claims Act, asserting claims under Texas law for nuisance, tortious interference, conversion, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court dismissed Konans claims, finding them barred by the postal exception. Konan , the government now seeks review. But the U.S.
That's why there "are no twins of the modern felon-in-possession laws" from the Founding. So when people exposed to Agent Orange sued Dow in state court, Dow was able to have the case removed to federal court under the federal-officer removal statute. Second Circuit : We used to hang felons like you.
Congress passed the law to create a national framework for congressional and presidential elections. The law sets specific rules for campaign spending and gives the Federal Election Commission (FEC) broad power to regulate elections under those rules. A quarter-century later, in 2001, the court in FEC v.
NA In a recent Just Security article, NYU law Prof. Samuel Estreicher and attorney Andrew Babbitt criticize the May 28 Court of International Trade ruling against Trump's IEEPA tariffs, in VOS Selections, Inc. The case is now on appeal before the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. But CIT did not avoid it!
In a series of recent decisions, federal courts across the United States have addressed a range of significant legal issues, from civil rights and constitutional law to administrative authority and criminal justice. DEA , where the court upheld the DEAs denial of psilocybin use under the Controlled Substances Act.
and the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project (ASAP), along with a group of expectant and recent mothers, amended their lawsuit in the US District Court for the District of Maryland to seek class certification on behalf of all children born in the US on or after February 19, 2025, whose parents are neither US citizens nor lawful permanent residents.
The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Trump administration to weigh in on a dispute between Exxon Mobil and three Cuban-owned companies stemming from the Cuban governments seizure of property more than a half-century ago. Title III of the law allows U.S. The call for the views of the U.S. solicitor general in Exxon Mobil Corp.
She challenges assumptions, pressing lawyers to grapple with broader systemic consequences and the lived experiences behind the law. Their exchanges in oral arguments offer more than just legal analysisthey reveal two distinct visions for how the law should function and who it should protect.
Although several justices in recent years have expressed skepticism about so-called nationwide injunctions, which bar the government from enforcing a law or policy anywhere in the country, during more than two hours of oral arguments, it was not clear whether a majority of the justices were ready to bar such injunctions altogether.
This post is part of a new Climate Law Blog series, 100 Days of Trump 2.0 , in which the Sabin Center offers reflections on the first 100 days of President Trumps second term across a variety of climate-related topics. To read other posts from the series, which will roll out over the course of this week, click here.
On March 28, the District Court extended the TROs for up to an additional 14 days. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the Governments emergency motion to stay the orders. The Government then applied to the Supreme Court, seeking vacatur of the orders. The Court agreed to consider the case on an emergency basis.
While the Supreme Court routinely throws out lower-courtdecisions granting prisoners habeas relief, its fairly uncommon for the justices to summarily grant relief to habeas petitioners. Relisted after the Dec. 10 and Jan. 17 conferences.) Apache Stronghold v. Relisted after the Jan. 10 and Jan. 17 conferences.)
The federal government gives money to the states with certain conditions. If the states do not comply with those conditions, the federal government can sue the states or withdraw the funding or do nothing at all. Conversely, if the states object to how the conditions are being enforced, the states can sue the federal government.
The Medicaid Act was enacted pursuant to Congresss power under Laws under the Constitutions spending clause, which allows Congress to attach conditions to federal funds. Under federal law, Medicaid funds cannot generally be used for abortions. The Supreme Court, it says, has made clear that this is a stringent test.
Seila Law, 140 S. Rather, reviewing courts must consider a government program holistically, with an eye toward its compatibility with our constitutional history and structure. Yet, in both cases, the Supreme Court reversed. But the court's analogy and associated logic do not work. Adler ed., Ross trans.,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content