This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Indeed, Roberts reflected, when the whole point of the governments inquiry in deciding whether to grant or deny marketing authorization is whether the products will be sold to the public, the retailers might be the most likely people to challenge the denial of authorization. The government gets sued in a lot of places, she noted.
In 1993, William Neilly was sentenced in Michigan state court to life without the possibility of parole for a homicide he committed as a juvenile. Because of intervening Supreme Courtdecisions prohibiting the imposition of no-parole life sentences for juvenile offenders, he was resentenced to a lesser sentence. 28 conference.)
The monograph predominantly examines 19 Indonesian courtdecisions on choice of law in international commercial contracts during the period, 2000-2020. Procedurallaw matters are reserved for the forum, and some Indonesian judges only appear to see the procedural aspects of choice of law.
Although some questions remain as to the reach of this case and its consequences, it remains a very important decision and therefore warrants attention. Facts The summaries of facts in UAE courts’ decisions are sometimes sparse in details. 468/2017 of 14 December 2017 ; Abu Dhabi Supreme Court, Appeal No.
Article 6, on the other hand, says that a foreign state shall not be deemed to have consented to jurisdiction by appearing in Chinese court to assert immunity, by having its representatives testify, or by choosing Chinese law to govern a particular matter. as well as “PRC laws” and “international agreements.” Convention.
According to a widespread view, adaption is very often necessary with regard to the spouse’s share in the deceased’s estate, namely if the matrimonial property regime and questions relating to succession are governed by different laws. However, in this article, the author takes the opposite view. A reshaping of Art. Pursuant to Art.
The agreement was governed by Chinese law and provided that suits could be resolved by courts in Beijing. 1 Intermediate People’s Court. This language about Moroccan courts is quite similar to the country report statements about China that the New York court found conclusive. Guoqing Guan, Index No.
In order to obtain a recognisable filiation decision in favour of the intended parents, a (declaratory) courtdecision is sought in Ukraine after the childs birth. Such a courtdecision can be recognised in Germany under procedurallaw.
German civil procedurallaw allows for video hearings under section 128a (1) German Code of Civil Procedure. Things are cetainly more difficult when it comes to the taking of evidence. The Panel has done this only once so far, apparently within the scope of application of the EU Taking of Evidence Regulation.
For the contracting parties as well as for third parties, the conflict-of-laws in claims following the disregard of such duties is determined by the application of Article 4 Regulation Rome II. von Bary: News on Procedural Consumer Protection from Luxemburg: Consumer Status and Change of Domicile. This norm is part of procedurallaw.
German civil procedurallaw allows for video hearings under section 128a (1) German Code of Civil Procedure. Things are certainly more difficult when it comes to the taking of evidence. The Panel has done this only once so far, apparently within the scope of application of the EU Taking of Evidence Regulation.
Voß: Qualifying Direct Legal Claims and culpa in contrahendo under European Civil ProcedureLaw. Even more so, qualifying them adequately and predictably under European civil procedurelaw poses a challenge that the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has not yet resolved across the board.
Thomale: Inheritance of limited partnership interests in cross-border cases (German) The case note discusses a judgment rendered by the Higher Regional Court of Hamm, concerning the inheritance of limited partnership interest in a German partnership while the inheritance succession is governed by Austrian law.
Supreme Courtdecision in March 2021 in Ford vs. Montana now permits the exercise of specific jurisdiction when the claim arises out of or is (sufficiently) “related” to the defendant’s in-state contacts and activities. The decision also deals with questions of German procedurallaw. The long-awaited U.S.
In the judgment C-568/20, the CJEU held that a decision of a court of an EU Member State which merges a judgment of a third state is enforceable under Articles 39 ss of the Brussels Ibis Regulation. Thole: The law applicable to voidable payments by third parties under Article 16 EIR. In the EU, the Succession Regulation No.
Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137. The Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act and the Hague Judgments and Jurisdictions Projects”, Osgoode Hall Law Journal 55 (2018), pp 257-304. “The Beaumont, Paul. Beaumont, Paul R. Blom, Joost.
Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming. “The The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.),
Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming. “The The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.),
Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming. “The The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.),
Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming. “The The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.),
Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming. “The The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.),
Illinois , holding that if prosecutors obtain a conviction using what they know is false testimony, the conviction must be set aside if there is “any reasonable likelihood” that the false testimony could have affected the jury’s decision.
Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming. “The The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.),
Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming. “The The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.),
Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming. “The The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.),
Successive Nigerian governments across all tiers have made the attraction of foreign investments a cardinal part of their economic policies and have accordingly made deliberate efforts and committed abundant resources to attract foreign investments into Nigeria. [1]
79-109 (available here ) Amurodov, Jahongir “Some issues of Ratification of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (2019) by the Republic of Uzbekistan”, Uzbek Law Review 2020-03, pp. EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?,
79-109 (available here ) Amurodov, Jahongir “Some issues of Ratification of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (2019) by the Republic of Uzbekistan”, Uzbek Law Review 2020-03, pp. EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?,
79-109 (available here ) Amurodov, Jahongir “Some issues of Ratification of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (2019) by the Republic of Uzbekistan”, Uzbek Law Review 2020-03, pp. EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?,
However, Arroyos ADA claim had already been decided in his favor, and the only remaining issue was his state law claim for damages under the Unruh Act. Decision The Ninth Circuit reversed the district courtsdecision to dismiss the Unruh Act claim, ruling that the federal court should have kept jurisdiction over it.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content