Remove Court Decisions Remove Government Remove Statute
article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules in favor of healthcare provider in identity theft dispute

JURIST

United States that in order to constitute aggravated identity theft, the use of a person’s identity must be at the “crux” of what makes the conduct criminal, reversing a lower court decision. The government also applied a sentence enhancement under 18 U.S.C.

article thumbnail

Federal appeals court refuses to stay decision striking down CDC eviction moratorium

JURIST

The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on Monday denied the federal government’s motion to stay a district court decision striking down the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) eviction moratorium. In response to COVID-19, the CDC ordered a nationwide moratorium on residential evictions last fall.

Court 211
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court hears arguments in firearms possession cases

JURIST

United States the Court held that in order to convict someone under the statute, the government must prove both that a defendant knew he possessed a firearm and that he knew he belonged to a category of persons prohibited from possessing firearms. Decisions in both cases should come this summer. Two years ago in Rehaif v.

Court 203
article thumbnail

Only named defendants’ profits can be awarded in trademark suit, justices rule

SCOTUSBlog

Justice Elena Kagans succinct opinion for a unanimous court squarely rejected the lower courts approach, ruling that profits only of the named defendant can be awarded. The problem, though, Kagan explained, is that this is not a tenable take on the decisions below, which never considered that portion of the statute.

Statute 71
article thumbnail

Heir to Chicago political dynasty brings his “false statement” charges to Supreme Court

SCOTUSBlog

In 1982, Thompson tells the justices, the Supreme Court declined to interpret the same law to cover bad checks, rejecting the governments argument that writing a bad check is a false statement because it falsely implies that there is enough money in the account to cover the amount of the check.

Court 89
article thumbnail

Justices will revisit whether certain noncitizens in lengthy detention are entitled to bond hearings

SCOTUSBlog

government deported him to Mexico. The government reinstated his prior removal order. While the Supreme Court has never set a bright-line test on when a detainee is entitled to a bond hearing, the U.S. The Supreme Court will now review those decisions. After one such entry, the U.S. In Zadvydas v.

article thumbnail

SCOTUS Clarifies Statute of Limitations for APA Claims

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court held that a claim under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) does not accrue for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 2401(a) ’s default six-year statute of limitations until the plaintiff is injured by final agency action. The District Court dismissed the suit as time-barred under 28 U.

Statute 52