This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Tuesday reversed insider trading convictions against four defendants over leaks from a US healthcare agency. The 2018 convictions were called for reconsideration following the 2020 US Supreme Courtdecision in Kelly v. million in profits from this scheme.
Brevig, Senior Regulatory Device and Biologics Expert — Earlier this year, we posted on the still unsettled state of the law regarding whether “FDCA violations may, in certain circumstances, be material to the government’s decision whether to pay for the affected product, and thus relevant in an FCA case.” By JP Ellison & Holly N.
Indian law students are reporting for JURIST on law-related developments in and affecting India. Here Apoorv Vats, a second-year student at NALSAR University of Law, files from Hyderabad. The Supreme Court of India Friday dismissed a plea challenging the Caste Census initiated in the Indian state of Bihar.
Facts of the Case Petitioner David Dubin was convicted of healthcare fraud under 18 U.S.C. The issue before the Court was whether, in defrauding Medicaid, he also committed “[a]ggravated identity theft” under 18 U.S.C. The Court today rightly rejects that unserious position.” 1028A(a)(1). 1028A(a)(1).
While the Court acknowledged that Jill Hines, a healthcare activist, faced COVID–19-related restrictions on Facebook, it found that she could not demonstrate likely future harm at the hands of these defendants. This Court has never accepted such a boundless theory of standing.”
The hospitals argued that the profits helped them offset the considerable costs of providing healthcare to the uninsured and underinsured in low-income and rural communities, something that Congress was well aware of and intended when it passed the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act in 2003.
Professors Lemley, Seymore, and Karshtedt (it is so sad that he is no longer with us) published an article in 2020 entitled The Death of the Genus Claim , which asserts that “the law has changed dramatically in the last thirty years, to the point where it is nearly impossible to maintain a valid genus claim.” 2019); Bayer Healthcare LLC v.
A Second Circuit decision vacated two lower court rulings which allowed healthcare workers to claim religious exemptions to New York’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The decision also vacated an injunction from the Northern District of New York and a prior Second Circuit ruling on an Eastern District of New York case.
Livornese — I saw the sign…and the answer is no—FDA-approved labeling apparently is not enough under state failure-to-warn laws, according to certain courts. A recent state law failure-to-warn case in the SDNY makes that very point. Koblitz & Deborah L.
The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Monday reversed a preliminary injunction previously implemented to bar the enforcement of an Indiana law requiring fetal remains to be either buried or cremated by clinics that provide abortion. The laws require that only abortion providers either bury or cremate fetal remains.
In response to the ruling, attorney for the ACLU of Texas Brain Klosterboer stated : The courtdecision is a critical victory for transgender youth and their families, supporters, and health providers against this blatantly unconstitutional law. The ACLU of Texas represents the plaintiffs.
Wade, in federal law. The Reproductive Freedom For All Act is a response to the recent Supreme Courtdecision in Dobbs v. Controversially, the bill also includes protections for “conscience,” which would allow healthcare workers to deny abortion or refuse to recommend abortion care if they have a religious objection.
North Carolina reproductive rights groups Monday filed a motion seeking to temporarily enjoin a ban on advanced healthcare professionals providing medication abortions. Maffetore says, “By asking the court to immediately block this restriction, we further our fight for reproductive justice in our state.”.
Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday was divided over whether Planned Parenthood has a legal right under federal civil rights laws to challenge the order by South Carolinas governor barring abortion clinics, including Planned Parenthood, from participating in Medicaid. Federal law generally bars the use of Medicaid funds for abortions.
Healthcare providers in states with abortion bans are unable to meet the standard of care, resulting in negative health outcomes for their patients, a new study reveals. The report first provides a comprehensive display of how states have changed their abortion policies since June 2022 when the Supreme Courtdecision in Dobbs v.
The US Supreme Court announced Monday it will review the legality of state efforts to ban gender-affirming medical care for minors — a contentious issue in a nation deeply divided over transgender rights and the role of medical intervention in youth gender identity. The case, US v.
The decision overturns a 2018 ruling which held there is a fundamental right to abortion in Iowa. Planned Parenthood sued to challenge a 2020 law which requires a 24 hour waiting period before an abortion. After a lower court ruled the law was unconstitutional, Iowa appealed to the state supreme court.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Wednesday announced it had filed a lawsuit to block the application of a legal opinion in connection with Idaho’s abortion laws. In 2017, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit struck down a Florida law preventing medical professionals from asking patients about firearm ownership.
The Supreme Court of Georgia Wednesday reinstated the state’s six-week abortion ban after a lower court found the 2019 act unconstitutional on November 15. In a one-page order, the court granted the state’s request to stay the lower courtdecision. The lower court reasoned that Roe v.
A flurry of court rulings in April 2023 has left the future of the abortion pill mifepristone in question. Supreme Courtdecision on April 21 allows the drug to remain accessible without additional restrictions as the merits of the case are weighed in lower court proceedings. For now, a U.S.
With just a few weeks left before the Supreme Court’s summer recess, we’re entering the busiest phase of the year for relists. The court granted review in two cases on Monday: one-time relist Facebook v. Becerra , involving the calculation of reimbursement rates under the Medicare Act. relisted after the Jan.
That is the majority rule among the federal courts of appeals. Under the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, the court could grant relief only if he could show that the Lousiana Supreme Court’sdecision was “contrary to clearly established federal law.” The district court denied relief, and the U.S.
The US Supreme Court rejected the Biden administration’s appeal to review a lower courtdecision that bars emergency abortions violating Texas’ strict abortion ban on Monday, leaving in place restrictions on emergency abortion care in the state. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld this ruling in January 2024.
Lujan Grisham signed the order in response to the US Supreme Courtdecision in Dobbs v. The day the ruling came down, Lujan Grisham put out a statement explaining how New Mexico prepared in anticipation of the decision. In 2021 Lujan Grisham repealed New Mexico’s trigger law, which would have banned abortion in the state.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court declined Catholic Charities request for an exemption because the group adheres to the Catholic Churchs teachings in providing services which departs from what Wisconsin judged to be typical religious activities. Catholic Charities misconstrues the Wisconsin Supreme Courtsdecision.
But in response to legal challenges, Congress amended the law in 2022 to give the FTC the power to make changes to the authoritys rules. A group of states brought suit in a federal district court in Kentucky, challenging the constitutionality of the HISA and its funding mechanism. Judicial factfinding for restitution Under Apprendi v.
Marissa Zupancic is JURIST’s Washington DC Correspondent, a JURIST Senior Editor and a 3L at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. Today I attended oral arguments at the US Supreme Court for Food and Drug Administration v. I last attended oral arguments at the Supreme Court in the Trump v. We won’t stop fighting.”
The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on Monday stayed a lower courtdecision to block Florida laws that ban gender-affirming care for transgender minors and restrict such healthcare for transgender adults. percent of youth live in states that ban transgender healthcare.
The law further provides that if the president “determines … to take action to adjust imports of an article and its derivatives, the President shall implement that action by no later than the date that is 15 days after the day on which the President determines to take action.”. Issues : (1) Whether the Supreme Court should overrule Grutter v.
She challenges assumptions, pressing lawyers to grapple with broader systemic consequences and the lived experiences behind the law. Their exchanges in oral arguments offer more than just legal analysisthey reveal two distinct visions for how the law should function and who it should protect.
The question came to the court in the case of Ryan Carter , who was a member of the Air National Guard when he underwent spine surgery at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., A federal district court dismissed Carters claims, relying on the courtsdecision in Feres. Three years ago, in Dobbs v.
“This will go down in history reading as a 6-3 opinion, but it was actually 5-4 because Justice Amy Coney Barrett actually did set out one of the key arguments, which is that you can’t criminally prosecute over official versus unofficial acts,” said Joe Patrice, an editor of Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like a Lawyer.
Sharon Basch is a rising 2L at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. The most recent spate of United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decisions handed down late last week have left American citizens more divided than ever. But despite all the doom and gloom, the latest SCOTUS decisions are not the end of the story.
US President Joe Biden Wednesday signed an executive order protecting the right of American women to travel across state lines for abortion care and directing the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to protect abortion and reproductive healthcare access. It’s been the law for 50 years.
US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra announced on Monday that healthcare providers are prohibited from discriminating against gay and transgender individuals, reversing a controversial Donald Trump-era policy. The new policy echoes the US Supreme Courtdecision in Bostock v.
From judicial appointments to executive orders directly targeting law firms, to ramifications of tariff wars, the profession is experiencing a seismic shift. Some of the most significant areas include: Regulatory Changes The deregulatory agenda in healthcare, finance, and environmental law has introduced significant uncertainty.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content