Court Decisions Healthcare Statute 
JURIST
JUNE 8, 2023
United States that in order to constitute aggravated identity theft, the use of a person’s identity must be at the “crux” of what makes the conduct criminal, reversing a lower court decision. “The statute fails to provide even rudimentary notice of what it does and does not criminalize,” he wrote.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JULY 6, 2023
Supreme Court narrowed the scope of a federal aggravated identity theft statute. Facts of the Case Petitioner David Dubin was convicted of healthcare fraud under 18 U.S.C. The issue before the Court was whether, in defrauding Medicaid, he also committed “[a]ggravated identity theft” under 18 U.S.C. 1028A(a)(1).
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Mondaq
MAY 9, 2022
Healthcare facilities and other entities receiving federal financial assistance can breathe a little easier after a U.S. Supreme Court decision issued last week barring the.
FDA Law Blog
JUNE 15, 2022
The hospitals argued that the profits helped them offset the considerable costs of providing healthcare to the uninsured and underinsured in low-income and rural communities, something that Congress was well aware of and intended when it passed the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act in 2003. Becerra, No.
FDA Law Blog
NOVEMBER 30, 2022
Last month the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision to dismiss a False Claims Act (FCA) ( 21 U.S.C 3729) quit tam suit, alleging that Grifols USA, Grifols Biologicals, Grifols, S.A.,
At the Lectern
JUNE 17, 2022
” In dismissing the fair housing claims, the superior court had relied on the opinion in AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. ” In dismissing the fair housing claims, the superior court had relied on the opinion in AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. The court denied review in Hernandez-Valenzuela v.
JURIST
NOVEMBER 29, 2022
The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Monday reversed a preliminary injunction previously implemented to bar the enforcement of an Indiana law requiring fetal remains to be either buried or cremated by clinics that provide abortion. The laws require that only abortion providers either bury or cremate fetal remains.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
211 
Let's personalize your content