Remove Court Decisions Remove Immigration Remove Tort
article thumbnail

Second chance to evaluate ban on encouraging unlawful immigration

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Sineneng-Smith , the justices reversed a circuit-court decision that struck down a federal law criminalizing the act of “encourag[ing] or induc[ing]” noncitizens to enter or remain in the United States for financial gain.

article thumbnail

Three Supreme Court cases lead to California Lawyer of the Year honors

At the Lectern

One of the three CLAY award Supreme Court decisions is Guardianship of Saul H. the court made things easier for undocumented children to obtain from California courts the findings federal law requires to apply for immigration relief that creates a pathway to permanent resident status. 2022) 13 Cal.5th

Lawyers 81
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Japanese Yearbook of International Law (Vol. 66, 2023)

Conflict of Laws

It contains the following articles, case notes, and English translations of some court decisions relating to or relevant to private international law. 189) Kiyoshi Hasegawa Inclusion and Exclusion of Immigrants and Refugees in Japan: A Preliminary Study (p. The latest volume (Vol.

Tort 59
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Rejects Cause of Action Under Bivens Against Border Patrol Agent

Constitutional Law Reporter

Egbert then checked the immigration paperwork for Boule’s guest and left after finding everything in order. Boule filed a grievance with Agent Egbert’s supervisors and an ad- ministrative claim with Border Patrol pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). The Turkish guest unlawfully entered Canada later that evening.

article thumbnail

A call for the wider study of Private International Law in Africa: A Review of Private International Law In Nigeria

Conflict of Laws

What I would consider as an ambitious aspect of the book, however, is the authors’ categorical position regarding the non-binding effect of the obiter dicta of some Supreme Court decisions.

Laws 52