This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
” And Sarah Ladd of Kentucky Lantern reports that “ Kim Davis’ legal counsel moves to make her appeal a springboard for overturning marriage rights.” ” You can access at this link Kim Davis’s brief for appellant filed Monday in the U.S.
This was the scenario facing the New Zealand High Court in the recent case of Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley Family Trustee Limited [2022] NZHC 2881. Its substantive proceeding claims tortious conspiracy and a declaration that the Kentucky judgment is not recognised or enforceable in New Zealand.
The Sixth Circuit has affirmed a lower court'sdecision to deny coverage to a Kentucky amusement park that sought insurance coverage for losses stemming from the coronavirus pandemic, finding that its business income losses were not due to direct physical loss or damage.
Among the actions taken against radio stations was a consent decree with a Kentucky AM station requiring a $4500 monetary penalty plus the requirement for a compliance plan imposing significant paperwork requirements. Broadcast Law Blog ).
In their petition, the legislators argue that courts are split as to whether an official seeking to intervene in a case under a state law must prove that the state’s interest is not adequately represented. Federal law curtails the extent to which a federal court can consider arguments that a prisoner has not presented in state court. .
An increasing number of Americans now believe US Supreme Courtdecision-making is based more on political ideology than the rule of law. Evidence that this disturbing trend is true can be found when taking a closer look at the shift in how the Court has dealt with juvenile cases dating back to 2005.
Supreme Courtdecision Batson vs. Kentucky sets the standard used by courts today for determining whether a party’s challenge of a juror is discriminatory, but critics say it’s easy to get around and challenges are rarely successful. The 1986 U.S.
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky filed a complaint arguing that the law is unconstitutionally vague. The US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana agreed and issued a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the law. A three-judge panel of the appellate court reversed the lower courtdecision in a 2-1 split.
There is an interesting fight brewing in Kentucky between Attorney General Daniel Cameron and Gov. Beshear has correctly cited a major victory recently before the Kentucky Supreme Court — an unanimous decision in favor of his authority to issue pandemic orders. Andy Beshear. In Beshear v.
Was the Supreme Courtdecision last month overruling Roe v. Wade one of the worst decisions in the 233-year history of the Court? public seems to feel the same way. The decision has been criticized as “ an odious and discredited artifact of popular bigotry ” It was effectively overturned in 1983.
The trial court said it was troubled by the “disproportionate number of African-Americans who were struck,” but it was reluctant to grant Broadnax’s challenge to the strikes under Batson v. Kentucky because “it implies some sort of nefarious intent on the part of prosecutors.” Kentucky ex rel. rescheduled before the Jan.
Louisiana did not initially file a response to Granier’s petition, but – when instructed to do so by the Supreme Court – it countered that Granier was not entitled to relief because no Supreme Courtdecision had clearly accepted claims of implied bias. Kentucky ex rel. rescheduled before the Mar.
We’d all been working for over a year on a contract that would make it possible, someday in the future, for everyone to have free and open access to all the official courtdecisions ever published in the United States. state and federal courtdecisions representing the bulk of our nation’s common law.
District Courts in Louisiana and Kentucky agreed with the plaintiffs and preliminarily enjoined enforcement of the rule in the plaintiff States. Several States and other parties sought preliminary injunctions against the new rule, arguing among other things that the rule exceeded the bounds of the statutory text enacted by Congress.
The justices did not act on two sets of high-profile petitions that they considered last week: a group of challenges to bans imposed by Illinois and several municipalities in that state on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, as well as challenges to bans on gender-affirming care for minors in Tennessee and Kentucky.
Understandably, critics are troubled by the Supreme Court acting in such a unilateral manner and enlarging its own authority. By using the shadow docket, the Supreme Court escapes accountability for weighty decisions. He also made history as the first Latino editor in chief of the Texas Law Review.
A group of states brought suit in a federal district court in Kentucky, challenging the constitutionality of the HISA and its funding mechanism. But in response to legal challenges, Congress amended the law in 2022 to give the FTC the power to make changes to the authoritys rules. Judicial factfinding for restitution Under Apprendi v.
Kentucky is structural or is subject to harmless-error review; and (3) whether, in the context of jury selection, the 14th Amendment protects both religious status and religious belief, religious status only, or neither. relisted after the Jan. 12 and Jan. 19 conferences) Missouri Dept. of Corrections v.
James Harlan served in Congress and as Kentucky’s attorney general, and was a devoted follower of Henry Clay, to the point that Clay’s politics and James’ were almost interchangeable. Having lived through Dred Scott , he was deeply conscious of how mistakes by the court could lead to terrible outcomes. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co.
Some of these states had inactive preexisting laws banning abortion that have returned to effect in the wake of Roe, while others intentional passed “trigger laws” with language enacting their provisions the moment a courtdecision overturning Roe or an amendment or legislation codifying a state’s right to restrict abortion went into effect.
Two of the AGs leading the investigation – from Texas and Kentucky – took the unusual step of publicizing their civil investigation demands (“CIDs”), revealing the broad outlines of their inquiry. courtdecisions finding antitrust violations in connection with climate pledges. companies engaged in the fossil fuel business.
Justice Sotomayor dissented, writing that she believed the Court’s interpretation would allow defendants to “sidestep” the general bar on appellate review by “shoehorning” a civil rights or federal officer removal argument into their case for removal. They seek a courtdecision setting aside government approvals of the power plant.
In the Dobbs litigation of 2022, 26 states asked the court to overturn Roe and its successor, Casey. South Dakota, Louisiana and Kentucky have immediate prohibitions that will come into effect. Thus, we remain deeply divided. Roughly 16 states are poised or expected to make abortion illegal immediately under so-called trigger laws.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content