This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
“The Importance of Teaching Dred Scott: By limiting discussion of the infamous Supreme Courtdecision, law-school professors risk minimizing the role of racism in American history.” ” Law professor Jeannie Suk Gersen has this post online at The New Yorker.
The post Not Sure How To Mention Diversity After The Supreme CourtDecision? appeared first on Above the Law. In short, keep applying! We’ve Got You Covered.
WEINSTEIN AND THE NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALSby Sarah Midani (Albany LawSchool, Class of 2025; Editor-in-Chief, Albany LawReview)As Ms. MOLINEUX MEETS #METOO:EVALUATING THE MEDIAS COVERAGE OF PEOPLE V.
Yale Kamisar, a professor at the University of Michigan LawSchool who influenced landmark U.S. Supreme Courtdecisions on the rights of criminal defendants, has…
KOÇ UNIVERSITY LAWSCHOOL . CASE LAW SYMPOSIUM: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN DOMESTIC, INTERNATIONAL, AND FOREIGN JUDICIARIES. Koç University LawSchool is pleased to invite applications for the case law symposium on recent developments in domestic, international, and foreign judiciaries which will be held on 7 October 2022.
Georgia will take the justices back to law-school basics – the case could be a question on a law-school examination in criminal law. The state courts responded by characterizing the inconsistent verdicts as “repugnant,” vacating both verdicts, and authorizing a second trial on all counts.
Law students from the European Union are reporting for JURIST on law-related events in and affecting the European Union and its member states. Panagiotis Lampropoulos is a recent graduate of the University of Bristol LawSchool (UK). He is currently doing a year of required military service in Greece. .
The California Supreme Court Historical Society will soon present a webinar, “The Alexander Pantages Rape Trials: The Death(?) Caragozian published a Daily Journal column (reprinted here ) about the statutory rape case against famed theater owner Alexander Pantages, including the divided California Supreme Courtdecision ( People v.
” Related: Governor Newsom’s recall could trigger litigation about his successor in the Supreme Court, where a prior ruling may or may not be precedential. Are two unpublished Supreme Courtdecisions on recall elections precedential?
If state law holds a party responsible to compensate the victim of the fraud, Buckley reasons, the Bankruptcy Code must protect the claim from discharge. Buckley also emphasizes a Supreme Courtdecision from 1885 (not a typo), Strang v. A fact pattern worthy of a law-school classroom. What’s not to love.
Malcolm Maclachlan reports in today’s Daily Journal about impending state legislation to change the name of the UC Hastings lawschool because of recent focus on the institution’s founder, Serranus Hastings. In 1878, he donated $100,000 of his considerable wealth to found Hastings College of Law. 276-280, 348-350.).
March 1 marked the culmination of an ambitious and audacious project to digitize and provide free and open access to all official courtdecisions ever published in the United States. million published cases, some dating as far back as 1658.
On Tuesday, July 2, 2024, the Hamburg Max Planck Institute will host its 46th monthly virtual workshop Current Research in Private International Law at 2:00 pm – 3:30 pm (CEST). This survey of lower federal courtdecisions shows that U.S.
The Emory Law TI:GER Program was unique with its multidisciplinary approach to integrating technology commercialization and legal education. I was excited to lead this effort at the lawschool and continue to see great outcomes for our graduates.
Professor Kerameus started his academic career at the LawSchool of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, in his home town, and completed his career at the University of Athens. He taught Civil Procedure, Comparative and International Procedural Law in Greek and other leading Universities abroad. In Memoriam Prof.
This is evidenced by the US Supreme Court 2022 judgment Golan v. She is a former experienced judge in civil and commercial trials at the Shanghai Pudong New District People’s Court in China. 9-10:30am London/10-11.30am the Hague/4-5.30pm Beijing) RSVP now your free ticket here.
This is evidenced by the US Supreme Court 2022 judgment Golan v. She is a former experienced judge in civil and commercial trials at the Shanghai Pudong New District People’s Court in China.
Dodge (Professor, University of California, Davis, School of Law). & & Wenliang Zhang (Associate Professor, Renmin University of China LawSchool). This language about Moroccan courts is quite similar to the country report statements about China that the New York court found conclusive.
Dodge (George Washington University LawSchool) and first published on Transnational Litigation Blog. Walters relied on the Supreme Courtsdecision in First National City Bank v. courts must generally respect the corporate separateness of foreign states and their agencies or instrumentalities. Limbaugh, Jr.
The Biden administration is calling on law firms and lawschools to help fight evictions following a U.S. Supreme Courtdecision last week to remove protections created by the federal government in response to the pandemic, reports Bloomberg News.
Craig Williams and guest Gary Blasi , Professor of Law Emeritus at the UCLA School of Law, engage in a discussion about Governor Newsom’s executive order to remove homeless encampments in California. They explore the implications of this order, the recent Supreme Courtdecision in City of Grants Pass v.
“Our research into pregnancy in English prisons (there are no women’s prisons in Wales), published this week, has convinced me that imprisoning pregnant women is disproportionate, cruel and simply unnecessary,” said Epstein, an honorary research fellow at Coventry LawSchool.
Editors note – I invited Professor Nina Mendelson (University of Michigan LawSchool) to author a guest post after reading her 2020 Admin. Law Review article titled “ The Permissibility of Acting Officials: May the President Work Around Senate Confirmation? The leading Supreme Courtdecision, United States v.
This was reflected in the broad range of presentations, which featured both traditional and novel approaches to Private International Law (PIL). The two-day Festival included seven panels, the Forum Conveniens Annual Lecture at Edinburgh LawSchool and a book launch.
Written by Christina Shin, University of Sydney LawSchool On 1 June 2023, International Children’s Day, the University of Sydney’s Centre for Asian and Pacific Law (CAPLUS) hosted an online webinar discussing the issue of children’s welfare and voices in private international law (PIL).
the morning of a critical meeting at Harvard LawSchool, where I worked. Harvard professor Jonathan Zittrain and l were sitting down with Daniel Lewis and Nik Reed , the founders of a legal research startup named Ravel Law, along with lawyers from Harvard’s Office of General Counsel, Debevoise & Plimpton and Gundersen Dettmer.
The majority of the Supreme Court is once again shifting their interpretation of the law in order to support right-wing political objectives! More lawschools are kicking USNWR rankings to the curb. More lawschools are kicking USNWR rankings to the curb.
After growing up in the segregated South, Drew Days attended Yale LawSchool, worked as a civil rights lawyer alongside Martin Luther King, Jr., In that role, he argued 17 cases before the Supreme Court, including U.S. And I had their ear, explaining Supreme Courtdecisions on a regular basis over many years.
The petition alleges superior court error in denying a condemned prisoner’s request for DNA testing that he claims might establish his innocence. Related: Divided Ninth Circuit denies habeas relief to California death row inmate despite labeling a Supreme Courtdecision objectively unreasonable.]
At a recent Columbia LawSchool colloquium, jointly sponsored by the Sabin Center and the Millstein Center, participants posed a foundational question: How do corporate law standards of fiduciary duty relate to what scientists call the climate emergency? [1] 2] See also Janis P. Sarra and Cynthia A. 122(1.1) (emphasis added).
Jackson, 51, also adds to the relative “youth” of the current Court, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh also in their 50s. Jackson Brings Diversity to the Supreme Court. Like many of her peers on the Supreme Court, Jackson attended a prestigious lawschool, graduating from Harvard LawSchool in 1996.
However, he then said it was worth extending the moratorium because it would take time for a court to intervene and, in the interim, they could rush out money to renters despite the lack of constitutional authority to do so. Like many, I was mystified by the Supreme Courtdecision not to strike down the moratorium.
He is also a graduate of Columbia LawSchool. Having lived through Dred Scott , he was deeply conscious of how mistakes by the court could lead to terrible outcomes. Comparing courtdecisions with which he disagreed to Dred Scott was almost a reflexive tactic of his. I corresponded with Canellos about his book.
The remaining question, then, is whether Section 115 preempts state law claims for some other reason. Michael Burger is the Executive Director of the Sabin Center and a Senior Research Scholar at Columbia LawSchool. But that’s an analysis, and a set of arguments, for another day.
Wolfe rattles off extreme proposals matter-of-factly as all viable options: Anyone concerned about the Supreme Court today should be working to prise that window open further. What these ideas share is a recognition that the rights-giving 20th-century Court that liberals came to respect, even revere, is gone.
The court has spent decades issuing often conflicting and vague 5-4 rulings on the use of race in admissions. Bollinger , the Court divided 5-4 on upholding admissions criteria used to achieve “diversity” in a class at Michigan LawSchool. In 2003 in Grutter v. For critics, that is an understatement.
Unfortunately, after a little more than a month of President Donald Trump’s second term in office, there are growing concerns that the rule of law may be in grave danger. This precarious situation has inspired leaders of the bar to step up to affirm their support of the rule of law in America.
She has called for “genuine” law professors not to fall “into complicity with lawlessness” in teaching such subjects. It is the latest voice of intolerance and orthodoxy at a leading lawschool. In the age of rage, calls for radical action from both professors and students have been particularly amplified at Georgetown University.
The threat to the free press is obvious and was the basis for foundational courtdecisions. The standard for defamation for public figures and officials in the United States is the product of a decision over 50 years ago in New York Times v. Like “disinformation,” it is heavily laden with subjectivity.
Below is my column in The Hill on the over-wrought reaction to the Supreme Courtdecision in Trump v. Commentators seemed to compete for the most alarmist accounts from court-sanctioned death squads to political assassinations to the death of democracy. United States. Jonathan Turley is the J.B. and Maurice C.
Richard Ashby Wilson, associate lawschool dean at the University of Connecticut, said “Trump crossed the Rubicon and incited a mob to attack the U.S. She added that there would be no acceptance of courtdecisions to the contrary: “We’re looking for a guilty verdict. If we don’t, we cannot go away.”.
The apocryphal author of “John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it,” has come back stronger than a 90s trend. Were Musk, Vance, and any of the other trolls attacking Judge Engelmayer to actually read the opinion, they’d find a textbook example of a legitimate TRO.
Below is my column on the Supreme Courtdecision on Friday in Fischer v. Part of the problem is the array of courtdecisions finding that Biden has repeatedly violated the Constitution, including engaging in racial discrimination and attempting to rule by circumventing Congress. Jonathan Turley is the J.B.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content