This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Amnesty International Australia issued a statement on Tuesday denouncing the Australian federal government’s newly proposed bill reintroducing punitive measures targeting a group of people released from immigration detention emphasizing that it undermines the recent High Courtdecision and breaches Australia’s international obligations.
A newly revised North Carolina juvenile justice law will take effect Sunday, aiming to address gaps in handling serious offenses by minors. This represents a significant change from the 2019 Raise the Age law , which allowed most 16- and 17-year-olds to remain under juvenile court jurisdiction regardless of the severity of the charges.
.”The Appellants, Madison Lara, Sophia Knepley, and Logan Miller, brought the action against the Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police on Second Amendment grounds, arguing they should be able to carry firearms outside their homes “for lawful purposes, including self-defense.”
Drummond , the Oklahoma Supreme Court sided with the states attorney general, Gentner Drummond , ruling that the charter school board had violated state law, the Oklahoma Constitution, and the US Constitution by approving St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School v. Isidore, a Catholic online school, as a charter school.
Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni on Saturday declared the Supreme Courtdecision in the matter of trying armed civilians in a military court martial as ‘wrong’, stating that the method reinforces the civilian judicial system in defending the lives of people against criminals armed with guns.
” The FDA appealed a Fifth Circuit courtdecision , which ruled the agency violated administrative law by misleading the applicant companies about scientific standards and rejecting applications without genuinely considering their efforts to discourage youth smoking.
BROUK has welcomed the courtsdecision, emphasizing its importance for the Rohingya and other communities suffering under military rule in Myanmar. These perpetrators will eventually have to stand trial for the unspeakable suffering they have inflicted.
The US Court of Appeal for the Fifth Circuit blocked an appeal Friday from Texas gun owners and state Attorney General Ken Paxton seeking judicial approval of a Texas gun law that exempts the state from federal firearm silencer regulations. Standing is a doctrine that courts require for an individual’s grievance to be heard.
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit temporarily stayed a district court’s preliminary injunction on Saturday that blocked a California law that prohibits concealed carry permit holders from carrying firearms in most public places. With this stay, the California law will take effect in January 2024.
Carney issued a preliminary injunction on Wednesday blocking a California law that prohibits concealed carry permit holders from carrying firearms in most public places. The case is in the US District Court for the Central District of California. Carney found that the California law violates the Second Amendment of the US Constitution.
“Supreme Court Returns to a Culture War Battleground: Transgender Rights; On Wednesday, the justices will hear the marquee case of the term, a challenge to a Tennessee law banning several forms of medical care for transgender youths.” ” Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. Casey Parks and Ann E.
Last week, we wrote about two dissenting opinions in a Supreme Courtdecision that highlight the debate that is underway on the principles that govern defamation liability in the United States. As we wrote here and here , many states have been adopting laws that regulate political advertising.
“Court rulings wipe out gun laws in wake of Supreme Courtdecision; Lower court judges express confusion, uncertainty as they interpret June decision”: Michael Macagnone of Roll Call has this report.
A federal judge blocked a California law on Wednesday which would have required background checks for individuals seeking to buy ammunition. The judge found that the California law, known as Proposition 63, violated the US Constitution’s Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dissolved a previous stay on Saturday that allowed a California law to go into effect prohibiting concealed carry permit holders from carrying firearms in most public places, blocking the law. With this order, the California law will no longer take effect in January 2024.
“Homophobic Business Owners Are Having a Field Day Since Last Month’s Supreme CourtDecision”: Law professor Hila Keren has this Jurisprudence essay online at Slate. The post “Homophobic Business Owners Are Having a Field Day Since Last Month’s Supreme CourtDecision” appeared first on How Appealing.
The post The <em>Dobbs </em>Fallout Shows That CourtDecisions Depend More On Machiavelli Than The Founding Fathersmore appeared first on Above the Law. Instead of applying the Lemon Test, I just pray to Joe Pesci. First of all, I think he's a good actor.
The post Not Sure How To Mention Diversity After The Supreme CourtDecision? appeared first on Above the Law. In short, keep applying! We’ve Got You Covered.
“Supreme Failures from the Court; Conservative legal minds rank the worst twenty Supreme Courtdecisions of all time”: Matthew J. Franck and Mark David Hall have this post at the “Law & Liberty” blog.
“New York enacts new gun restrictions in response to supreme courtdecision; After court overturned 1911 New York law, state lawmakers produced act to create ‘gun-free zones’ and strengthen gun control measures”: Martin Pengelly of The Guardian (UK) has this report.
Harper after the latest North Carolina Supreme Courtdecision in the partisan gerrymandering case?” ” Derek Muller has this post at the “Election Law Blog.” Harper after the latest North Carolina Supreme Courtdecision in the partisan gerrymandering case?”
“Hawaii Struggles To Revise Gun Laws After Supreme CourtDecision; Honolulu is the only county in the state that hasn’t yet finalized new concealed-carry gun rules, leading to a backlog in permit applications”: James Gonser of Honolulu Civil Beat has this report. So if Paul D.
“New York’s Gun Laws Sow Confusion as Nation Rethinks Regulation; A Supreme Courtdecision overturning century-old New York gun regulations has produced scores of new lawsuits as jurists and citizens sort out what’s legal”: Jonah E.
“In the Gun Law Fights of 2023, a Need for Experts on the Weapons of 1791; A Supreme Courtdecision has forced courts to consider what gun restrictions existed two centuries ago, sending demand soaring for historians”: Shawn Hubler of The New York Times has this report.
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Rivkin Jr. & & Elizabeth Price Foley, The Wall Street Journal) The post The morning read for Tuesday, Oct. 15 appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
Aidana Tastanova is a Kazakhstan national and a 3rd year law student attending the Moscow State Institute of International Relations under a Kazakh government scholarship. To date, according to the Prosecutor General, almost 760 billion tenge has been returned to Kazakhstan.
“Harvard Needs Merit-Based Admissions; A Supreme Courtdecision could force colleges to move away from affirmative action and create true diversity on campus”: Law professor Alan M. Dershowitz will have this op-ed in Thursday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.
1 “does not contain an express reference to the “lawfulness” of measures taken by the State, but where the right is impeded the law should satisfy minimum requirements of accessibility and foreseeability.”
“In New SCOTUS Ruling, Words Were Not Enough; Wednesday’s controversial Supreme Courtdecision included two photographs, a rare attachment to the court’s written words”: Tony Mauro of The National Law Journal has this post at his “The Marble Palace Blog.”
says”: Mike Vilensky of Bloomberg Law has this report. Magazine Limit Fails on Appeal; Plaintiffs sued over ban on magazines with more than 10 rounds; D.C. prohibition has historical analog, D.C. ” You can access today’s ruling of a divided three-judge panel of the U.S.
Recent courtdecisions show how he intends to remedy that.” ” Law professor Kimberly Wehle has this essay online at Politico Magazine. The post “The Supreme Court Wants to End the Separation of Church and State. Recent courtdecisions show how he intends to remedy that.”
Board’: Friday marks the 70th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Courtdecision ‘Brown v. ” Tony Mauro recently had this post online at his “The Marble Palace Blog” at The National Law Journal. Board’: Friday marks the 70th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Courtdecision ‘Brown v.
“Colleges are bracing for a courtdecision on affirmative action. ‘We are going to continue to pursue within the limit of the law the diversity that is essential to the mission of this university,’ said Princeton President Christopher L. Here’s what Princeton’s president is doing to prepare.
His legacy is tied to a Supreme Courtdecision that upheld the ‘separate but equal’ doctrine, underpinning laws that segregated and disenfranchised African Americans for decades.” “Homer Plessy’s Arrest in 1892 Led to a Landmark Ruling. Now He May Get Justice.
The post Why A Delaware Supreme CourtDecision Affirming Shifting A Contingency Fee To The Losing Party Could Have Applications To Recovering The Costs Of Litigation Funding appeared first on Above the Law. Analogous logic could apply to the costs of litigation funding.
eDiscovery Assistant , a legal research platform for e-discovery case law and resources, is today introducing AI-generated case law summaries. The feature uses ChatGPT to deliver one-paragraph summaries of courtdecisions, with the goal of enabling legal professionals to more quickly gauge the relevance and implications of a decision.
Heres the Thursday morning read: Ex-Congressman’s Meme Fight Faces Long Odds at Supreme Court (Kyle Jahner, Bloomberg Law News) Supreme Court Fast-Tracks TikTok Case in Face of Jan. 19 appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
The ECP decided to deprive PTI of its symbol due to its failure to hold an intra-party election in accordance with the law. PTI then submitted petitions against ECP’s restriction order to the Lahore High Court (‘LHC’) and Peshawar High Court’s (PHC) respectively.
A government party appealed local election results, and the Federal High Court ruled that the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC) failed to adhere to proper electoral procedures stipulated by the Electoral Act 2010 , acting in contravention to the 90-notice to stakeholders before any elections.
But a federal appeals court ruled last year that Gutierrez does not have a legal right to sue, known as standing, to bring federal civil rights claims challenging the constitutionality of the Texas laws governing DNA testing. Now the Supreme Court will weigh in. On the one hand, Senior U.S.
In that case, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Google. The Fourth Circuit had previously upheld a trial courtdecision that South Carolina waived its Eleventh Amendment protections against subpoenas by participating in the federal lawsuit.
This post was written by Luana Matoso , a PhD candidate and research associate at Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law in Hamburg, Germany. Brazil has changed its law on international forum selection clauses. courts prior to the landmark U.S. Supreme Courtdecision in Bremen v Zapata Off-Shore Co.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content