Court Decisions Laws Malfeasance 
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 3, 2022
Dissatisfied with the purchase, Buckley eventually obtained a judgment in a California state court based on the failure of the Bartenwerfers to disclose information about the house on the standard-form Transfer Disclosure Statement. Buckley also emphasizes a Supreme Court decision from 1885 (not a typo), Strang v.
SCOTUSBlog
FEBRUARY 23, 2023
Three terms ago in Seila Law v. The lenders filed a conditional cross-petition arguing that if the court takes the CFPB’s petition, it should take two other issues that might also invalidate the rule. LLC involves how to determine the law to be applied under federal admiralty law in a maritime contract case.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JURIST
FEBRUARY 17, 2025
” The administration based its argument on several recent Supreme Court decisions. Seila Law LLC v. 1211(b) states that Special Counsel may only be removed for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” CFPB and Collins v.
SCOTUSBlog
FEBRUARY 21, 2025
Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, dissented from the courts decision not to act on the Trump administrations request. Under the federal law creating the agency, the president can only remove the head of the office, who serves a five-year term, for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
94 
Let's personalize your content