This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
“Courts Strike Down Gun Control Measures in Two States; The rulings in Maryland and Oregon come amid a shifting legal landscape in the wake of a Supreme Courtdecision that has imposed new limits on gun regulation”: David W. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit at this link. ” And Bryan P.
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, which had thrown out David Smiths 22-year conviction and sentence for a brutal attack on Quortney Tolliver in 2016. The state trial court rejected that motion, and he was convicted. The justices denial of relief in Davis v. Smith found more success when he sought federal post-conviction relief.
In her view, before a court invalidates the lower court’sdecision on fairness grounds, the party seeking to have the decision invalidated ‘must explain what harm — other than having to accept the law as the lower court stated it — flows from the inability to appeal the lower courtdecision.”
Four months after District Attorney George Gascón sent a request to law enforcement agencies across Los Angeles County, more than 40 departments have yet to provide his office with names of officers who have histories of dishonesty and other misconduct that could affect their credibility in court, reports the Los Angeles Times.
In April 2022, Vanda Pharmaceuticals filed a complaint in the Maryland Federal District Court to challenge CMS’ definition on Administrative Procedure Act (APA) grounds. We previously blogged on the district court’sdecision last year. MJM-22-977 (Dist.
Sineneng-Smith , the justices reversed a circuit-courtdecision that struck down a federal law criminalizing the act of “encourag[ing] or induc[ing]” noncitizens to enter or remain in the United States for financial gain. Helaman Hansen ran an immigration-advising service called Americans Helping America Chamber of Commerce.
Carole Johnson (consolidated cases), the Court found that the conditions set by Novartis and United Therapeutics on covered entities did not violate the 340B statute, although more restrictive conditions could violate the law. This decision may encourage more state-level efforts to adopt similar laws.
Koblitz — You know a courtdecision is going to be worth reading when the judges compare FDA’s regulatory governance of flavored e-cigarettes to a Shakespearean gaslighting. FDA originally set the PMTA deadline as August 8, 2022, but a district court in Maryland ordered FDA to shorten it. By David B.
Over the last five years, cities, counties, and states across the country have sued fossil fuel companies alleging that the companies violated state law in marketing their products as safe. Supreme Court declined to hear a petition on whether the climate liability cases should be heard in state or federal court.
What they are really doing is trying to avoid the need to reveal the identity of their contributors, following a US District Courtdecision in March. This is is the provision that led to the US District Courtdecision at issue. " Maryland Rep. " As explained below, these claims are incorrect.
(Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images) In early June 2022, in the wake of the unprecedented leak of a draft of the Supreme Courts Dobbs opinion, Nicholas Roske, a California man in his mid-20s, was arrested near Justice Brett Kavanaughs Maryland home. Roske, who was reportedly angry about the Courtsdecision to overturn Roe v.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. Baltimore and Incinerator Operator Settled Lawsuit over Local Air Law. Oil pump, ( Creative Commons ). By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. The court rejected Exxon’s argument that it could withhold documents based on an accountant-client privilege under Texas law. and non-U.S. Pritzker , Nos.
Konan sued the USPS under the Federal Tort Claims Act, asserting claims under Texas law for nuisance, tortious interference, conversion, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. In an unusual move, Konan, reprented by the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, has filed a conditional cross-petition ( Konan v.
Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. A number of different parties had lined up on either side of the issue of whether EPA’s stay was lawful. and non-U.S. United States , No.
The Supreme Court is hitting its stride in sorting through the relists. At its last conference, it granted review of a one-time relist asking whether federal courts must follow state law requiring medical malpractice claims to be supported by an expert affidavit. New Relists Escobar v.
Over time, we can expect more law enforcement agencies to deploy them,” says the Electronic Frontier Foundation. So it’s worthwhile to review the original Baltimore program for clues about how to manage a tool that Police Chief Magazine , a publication of the International Association of Police Chiefs, calls “Law Enforcement’s Future.”.
In 1993, William Neilly was sentenced in Michigan state court to life without the possibility of parole for a homicide he committed as a juvenile. Because of intervening Supreme Courtdecisions prohibiting the imposition of no-parole life sentences for juvenile offenders, he was resentenced to a lesser sentence.
published in the Brooklyn Law Review. The 1991 Supreme Court ruling in Payne v. Subsequent courtdecisions have muddied the legal waters on VIS. But there are valuable critiques of VIS, too, argues Bandes in an essay entitled “What Are Victim Impact Statements For? In Booth v.
Several of them are sequels to earlier high courtdecisions. First Amendment The current court is very solicitous of First Amendment rights. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit rejected that claim. Tingley also asks the court to overrule Employment Division v. Four years ago, the Supreme Court held in Nieves v.
Both reshaped American law and society. But only one can be chosen by SCOTUSblog readers as the greatest justice in the court’s history. Ask any constitutional law student to name the most iconic Supreme Courtdecision, and they’ll probably answer Marbury v. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. Board of Education.
It’s a little surprising the court let stand a federal courtdecision invalidating a state statute on constitutional grounds, but animal-rights groups defending that decision argued persuasively that state statutes are in a state of flux and it would be premature for the justices to take up the case now.
By allowing judges to ignore such considerations when sentencing a young person to die behind bars, the recent Supreme Courtdecision promises to further inequity. Even the victim’s wife agreed, underscoring that Jones, like other youth, is indeed redeemable and can work towards atoning for his heinous acts.
In 2015, the Supreme Court put Glossip’s execution (as well as those of two other men) on hold while it considered their challenge to the state’s lethal injection protocol. In doing so, he writes, the state court applied that law “essentially verbatim” in its opinion, without referring to federal law.
The term refers guns that are assembled in parts and, therefore, difficult to trace by law enforcement due to their lack serial numbers and transfer records. Maryland and Napue v. The post SCOTUS Kicks Off New Term With … appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. The most closely watched case is Garland v. Williams v.
The United States Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (and the later denial of a motion for consideration ) in rejecting the much touted lawsuit to give residents a vote in Congress. ” Obviously, this decision would not impact D.C.
But in July, Laufer asked the justices to throw out the case, and invalidate the 1st Circuit’s decision in her favor. Jackson later asked why, if the issue is going to arise again, the court shouldn’t just “wait until it comes up again.”
Best Price Stacking We previously blogged about the 4 th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in United States Ex Rel. Allergan Sales , which affirmed a lower courtdecision in a Federal False Claims case involving best price stacking. Sheldon, v.
The court of appeals, it explained, rejected Andrews claim because, it thought, no holding of this Court established a general rule that the erroneous admission of prejudicial evidence could violate due process. That was wrong, the court concluded.
While past nominees have been found to have similarly limited records on constitutional interpretation, a senior editor at Above the Law declared asking such questions as akin to declaring her a “lesser Black woman.” ” Indeed, the expectations for the hearing were made clear by Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-S.C.,
The court will likely be paying special attention to three of them, which are this week’s new relists. The court will be considering each of them for a second time. Two of the cases involve criminal law, and one is a capital case. The third case involves a fairly arcane issue of pleading claims under federal pension law.
Share The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a challenge to Marylands handgun licensing regime, as well as a pair of cases seeking to hold oil and gas companies responsible for damage caused by climate change. The justices denied review in Maryland Shall Issue v. The court will consider the petition in Snope v.
Walters , 20-1143 , involves a very specific question of arbitration law. The state of Arizona now seeks review at the Supreme Court. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit held as a matter of law that the officers’ actions were not excessive force because Gilbert’s conduct could legitimately have been interpreted as “resistance.”
While the Supreme Court routinely throws out lower-courtdecisions granting prisoners habeas relief, its fairly uncommon for the justices to summarily grant relief to habeas petitioners. Relisted after the Jan. 10 and Jan. 17 conferences.) Relisted after the Jan. 10 and Jan. 17 conferences.) Relisted after the Jan. 10 and Jan.
Three terms ago in Seila Law v. The lenders filed a conditional cross-petition arguing that if the court takes the CFPB’s petition, it should take two other issues that might also invalidate the rule. LLC involves how to determine the law to be applied under federal admiralty law in a maritime contract case.
A Supreme Courtdecision Thursday upending a century-old New York State gun licensing restriction has been called a major blow to state gun control interventions across the country. The Court released its opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association (NYSRPA) v. Unequal Rights.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. South Dakota Federal Court Granted Preliminary Injunction Against Enforcement of Laws Targeting Pipeline Protesters. and non-U.S. Jewell , No.
But in response to legal challenges, Congress amended the law in 2022 to give the FTC the power to make changes to the authoritys rules. A group of states brought suit in a federal district court in Kentucky, challenging the constitutionality of the HISA and its funding mechanism. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit affirmed.
Although Roberts did not mention any of the hostile foreign state actors responsible for such disinformation by name, the justices will hear oral arguments next week in a challenge to a federal law that would require social media giant TikTok to shut down in the United States unless its parent company can sell it off by Jan.
We have seen the freezing or termination of federal grants and other financial assistance, executive orders seeking to usurp state and local authority, the initiation of extensive deregulatory efforts, threats to green banks and nonprofit organizations, and significant developments in federal courts.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. She also was persuaded that Congress had ratified the lower appellate courtdecisions holding that there was a narrower scope of review. and non-U.S.
The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Friday reversed a lower courtdecision temporarily blocking President Donald Trump’s executive orders (“the orders”) banning diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs at federal agencies and business that contract with the federal government.
The court did not add any new cases to their docket for the 2025-26 term. It also once again did not act on several high-profile petitions for review, including a challenge to Marylands ban on military-style assault weapons and a challenge to Rhode Islands ban on large-capacity magazines. More than two decades ago, in Apprendi v.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. The cities also have filed a motion to amend their complaints to withdraw federal common law public nuisance claims that they added after the district court denied remand.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
100 
Let's personalize your content