This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
That not only amounts to a reversal of a precedent set earlier by the Court, but is an “alarming” step back in protecting juveniles, say Arthur Ago and Rochelle Swartz of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. In Miller v. Four years later, in Montgomery v.
In this earlier blo g, I commented on the pending litigation over unanimous verdicts at courts-martial. As military defense lawyers we continue to support the advice given that the issue should be raised in all courts going forward. The update is that the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces has decided United States v.
There are state courts and federal courts, state statutes and federal statutes, state common law and federal common law. When I imagine a foreign lawyer trying to explain this system to a foreign client, my heart fills with pity. Do state courts enforce these clauses at the same rate as federal courts?
The nation’s African American leaders, from Frederick Douglass on down, were intensely focused on Harlan’s arguments, and he helped to inspire future generations of African American lawyers. Having lived through Dred Scott , he was deeply conscious of how mistakes by the court could lead to terrible outcomes. In Plessy v. Crossen Co.
The Furman litigation was the culmination of a campaign conducted by a group of lawyers under the auspices of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. They hoped the Supreme Court would strike down the death penalty because of its demonstrated racial discrimination and other inequities. Reaction to the Furman decision was swift.
Lawyers objected but the judge let the testimony in. The system is at its most opaque when prosecutors know evidence is unfit for court but choose to game the rules, hoping judges and juries will believe it and vote to convict. People like Faria, defense lawyers and sometimes even the judges are blindsided. “I I was wrong.
So much so, in fact, that Chief Justice William Rehnquist, writing for the majority, chastised Souter for doing a disservice to the Courts traditional method of adjudication. Although these cases span different areas of the law, they are all united by a common thread.
In an apparent effort to create perpetual full employment for federal sentencing lawyers , the Supreme Court long ago adopted a “categorical approach” to determine whether a predicate offense qualifies as a crime of violence under Section 924(c)(3)(A) (as well as under the Armed Career Criminal Act, codified at Section 924(e)).
Share In 2022, the Louisiana legislature adopted a congressional map that included only one majority-Black district among the six allotted to the state, though a third of the states population is Black. On Monday, the Supreme Court will take up the latest stage in the struggle over Louisianas congressional map.
But in one of those cases, the court’s denial of review prompted two justices to object. Federal prisoner Quartavious Davis asserted that his trial lawyer rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance for not pursuing a plea deal for him, causing him to receive a sentence many times longer than his co-defendants who pleaded guilty.
This begs the question of what is genuinely considered as an “emergency decision,” as opposed to a decision that the court is trying to make hastily with little fanfare. Decisions that could have significant ramifications on Americans must be heard on a more substantive level. Louisiana v. American Rivers.
Medrano had initially invoked his right to silence and asked for a lawyer, but the police officers investigating the robbery urged his wife to persuade him to talk to them, telling her that if he spoke with them he could return home to her and their baby. A Florida state court upheld Cunningham’s conviction.
For instance, the National Right to Life Committee and the Louisiana Right to Life Federation argue that the court should reject the “categorical viability line” and replace it with a new “roadmap” under which courts would consider all state interests when analyzing the constitutionality of prohibitions on pre-viability elective abortions.
BRIC is widely relied upon, and local newspapers are reporting the potential loss of millions of dollars in funding for localities in Kentucky , Louisiana , Maryland , New Jersey , Florida , North Dakota , and Alaska. Pursuant to the Clean Air Act and the 2007 Supreme Courtdecision in Massachusetts v.
After the developers terminated the Keystone XL pipeline project, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on July 16, 2021 dismissed for lack of jurisdiction an appeal of the district court’s denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction barring work on the pipeline. Louisiana v. Oatly Group AB , No. 1:21-cv-06360 (S.D.N.Y.,
Headlines We saw an overwhelming amount of news related to the ethics of lawyers and judges last week. Law Firm Following Court Approval. after a courtdecision made it the first Big Four accounting firm eligible to practice law in the country. 4 Fears of Retribution for Prosecutors and Other Lawyers.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content