This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Gruber: A plea against ex post-adaptation of spousal inheritance rights Adaptation is recognized as a tool to eliminate the lack of coordination between the provisions of substantive law derived from different legal systems. Mandl: Apparent and virtual establishments reflected through Art. 5 Brussels Ia Regulation and Art.
Professor Kerameus started his academic career at the Law School of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, in his home town, and completed his career at the University of Athens. He taught Civil Procedure, Comparative and International ProceduralLaw in Greek and other leading Universities abroad.
It presents newly adopted legal instruments and summarises current projects that are making their way through the EU legislative process. It also refers to the laws enacted at the national level in Germany as a result of new European instruments. Such a courtdecision can be recognised in Germany under procedurallaw.
I allow myself to pick up a few elements from this fascinating interview in the following for our international audience: The Tenth Panel functions as a court of first appeal ( Berufungsgericht ) in patent nullity proceedings and as a court of second appeal for legal review only ( Revisionsgericht ) in patent infringement proceedings.
The monograph predominantly examines 19 Indonesian courtdecisions on choice of law in international commercial contracts during the period, 2000-2020. Conversely, Chapter One also acknowledges the book’s limitations, namely, that it only covers the express choice of law in international commercial contracts.
Concretely, the court being asked to recognize and enforce a foreign judgment evaluates whether the foreign court had proper jurisdiction to hear the dispute. The term “indirect” distinguishes this concept from its legal opposite: direct jurisdiction. However, as the case reported here shows this might no longer be the case.
In its new decision, the court reiterated that sanctioned Russian parties remain bound to previously concluded arbitration agreements. In addition, the court offered even more hands-on protection for parties trying to serve proceedings in Russia. Under Ukrainian law, the German intended parents would have been the legal parents.
I allow myself to pick up a few elements from this fascinating interview in the following for our international audience: The Tenth Panel functions as a court of first appeal ( Berufungsgericht ) in patent nullity proceedings and as a court of second appeal for legal review only ( Revisionsgericht ) in patent infringement proceedings.
In cross-border proceedings, service of legal documents poses particular problems, which are addressed by the European Regulation on the Service of Documents. Localising the place of damage in the context of capital investment cases is a perennial problem both under national and European civil procedurallaw.
Most students avoid it because of the adverse effect they think it is sure to have on their cumulative grade points average and the seeming lack of practical benefit of the subject to their future law practices. They do not know any better.
Lagoudi; Court of First Instance Korinthos No 1/2022, on the topic of parental care and maintenance of an out-of-marriage minor by parents of foreign citizenship, with commentary by Dr. G.-A.
Supreme Courtdecision in March 2021 in Ford vs. Montana now permits the exercise of specific jurisdiction when the claim arises out of or is (sufficiently) “related” to the defendant’s in-state contacts and activities. The decision also deals with questions of German procedurallaw. The long-awaited U.S.
They began with an overview of the instances where the choice of law questions are raised at the jurisdictional stage in the context of granting permission for service out of the jurisdiction, exploring the relevant gateways in the Practice Direction 6B of the Civil Procedure Rules.
In particular, the court quoted the observations that Chinese “[j]udges regularly received political guidance on pending cases, including instructions on how to rule, from both the government and the [Chinese Communist Party], particularly in politically sensitive cases” and that “[c]orruption often influenced courtdecisions.”
At 11pm (GMT) on 31 December 2020, the United Kingdom moved out of its orbit of the European Union’s legal system, with the end of the transition period in its Withdrawal Agreement and the conclusion of the new Trade and Cooperation Agreement. Voß: Qualifying Direct Legal Claims and culpa in contrahendo under European Civil ProcedureLaw.
They include international jurisdiction agreements, contracts creating an exception in European law, to generally prohibited contracts, and contracts providing the use of European Trademarks and other European rights valid even against third persons. That law is particularly concerned about its effectiveness, if needed by a creative approach.
Article 5 provides that a foreign state is deemed to consent if it files suit as a plaintiff, participates as a defendant and files “an answer or a counterclaim on the merits of the case,” or participates as a third party in Chinese courts. The corresponding provision in the draft law referred to Chinese “judgments” (??)
(Cooperative Constitutional State and the Codification of Private International Law: Notes on the “Judgment Project” of the Hague Conference on Private International Law). The Circulation of Judgments Under the Draft Hague Judgments Convention”, University of Pittsburgh School of LawLegal Studies Research Paper Series No.
2019 Hague Judgments Convention: Global Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments (Review of the International Conference held in Hong Kong on September 9, 2019), Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law 2020-03, pp. EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Brand, Ronald A.
2019 Hague Judgments Convention: Global Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments (Review of the International Conference held in Hong Kong on September 9, 2019), Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law 2020-03, pp. EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Brand, Ronald A.
2019 Hague Judgments Convention: Global Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments (Review of the International Conference held in Hong Kong on September 9, 2019), Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law 2020-03, pp. EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Brand, Ronald A.
(Cooperative Constitutional State and the Codification of Private International Law: Notes on the “Judgment Project” of the Hague Conference on Private International Law). The Circulation of Judgments Under the Draft Hague Judgments Convention”, University of Pittsburgh School of LawLegal Studies Research Paper Series No.
(Cooperative Constitutional State and the Codification of Private International Law: Notes on the “Judgment Project” of the Hague Conference on Private International Law). The Circulation of Judgments Under the Draft Hague Judgments Convention”, University of Pittsburgh School of LawLegal Studies Research Paper Series No.
2019 Hague Judgments Convention: Global Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments (Review of the International Conference held in Hong Kong on September 9, 2019), Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law 2020-03, pp. EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Brand, Ronald A.
2019 Hague Judgments Convention: Global Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments (Review of the International Conference held in Hong Kong on September 9, 2019), Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law 2020-03, pp. EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Brand, Ronald A.
2019 Hague Judgments Convention: Global Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments (Review of the International Conference held in Hong Kong on September 9, 2019), Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law 2020-03, pp. EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Brand, Ronald A.
Our sincere thanks go to all involved, not only at the conference and in the book project, but also to the legal scholars from around the world who have kept us constantly informed about publications of their own work on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. International Law – A Practical Manual [Working Title], London 2022, pp.
The Circulation of Judgments Under the Draft Hague Judgments Convention”, University of Pittsburgh School of LawLegal Studies Research Paper Series No. A Commitment to Private International Law – Essays in honour of Hans van Loon, Cambridge 2013, pp 89-99 Brand, Ronald A. “On 166-172 (available here ) Brand, Ronald A.
The Circulation of Judgments Under the Draft Hague Judgments Convention”, University of Pittsburgh School of LawLegal Studies Research Paper Series No. A Commitment to Private International Law – Essays in honour of Hans van Loon, Cambridge 2013, pp 89-99 Brand, Ronald A. 166-172 (available here ) Brand, Ronald A. 2021-23, pp.
However, Arroyos ADA claim had already been decided in his favor, and the only remaining issue was his state law claim for damages under the Unruh Act. Decision The Ninth Circuit reversed the district courtsdecision to dismiss the Unruh Act claim, ruling that the federal court should have kept jurisdiction over it.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content