Remove Court Decisions Remove Legal Remove Stare Decisis Remove Texas
article thumbnail

Animal rights and the First Amendment, due process and a confession of error

SCOTUSBlog

Texas , involving allegations that a racially biased juror, who commented during voir dire that “non-white” races were statistically more violent than whites, served on petitioner Kristopher Love’s capital sentencing jury. Some older Supreme Court decisions support that theory of consent. Animal Legal Defense Fund.

Statute 106
article thumbnail

Allegations of racial bias in a death penalty trial

SCOTUSBlog

Texas , 21-6001. Issues : (1) Whether, on remand, the Texas court rejected the Supreme Court’s conclusions in Andrus v. rescheduled before the Jan. 25, March 4, March 18, March 25, April 1, April 14, April 22 and April 29 conferences; relisted after the May 12 conference). Returning Relists.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Private rights of action, overtime pay, and the constitutionality of a billboard tax

SCOTUSBlog

To begin with the unhappy news (at least for petitioners), the court denied review without comment in one-time relist Kelly v. Animal Legal Defense Fund , involving the constitutionality of a Kansas statute criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. Texas , 21-6001.

Statute 88
article thumbnail

Modernize U.S. abortion law — and return abortion policy to the democratic process

SCOTUSBlog

The Texas Heartbeat Act exemplifies lawmakers’ frustration with the status quo and their determination to protect unborn children and mothers. The abortion providers’ case relies heavily on stare decisis. First, Roe has been panned by scholars from the beginning, even by supporters of legalizing abortion.

Laws 119
article thumbnail

We read all the amicus briefs in Dobbs so you don’t have to

SCOTUSBlog

Three physicians and the Catholic Association Foundation write that advances in science have “painted an intimate portrait of the fetus and its humanity” and therefore the court’s viability framework is outdated. Against stare decisis. State abortion restrictions, they say, should be subject only to rational-basis review.