Remove Court Decisions Remove Legal Remove Virginia
article thumbnail

Virginia School Board to pay transgender student $1.3 million in discrimination case

JURIST

Working up through the lower courts, the US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, affirmed lower court decisions in August 2020; that the treatment of the School Board against Grimm was a violation of his constitutional rights. ” The post Virginia School Board to pay transgender student $1.3

article thumbnail

Virginia General Assembly approves state-level Voting Rights Act

JURIST

The Virginia General Assembly on Thursday approved a comprehensive state-level Voting Rights Act by a 21-18 vote in the state senate. The bill seeks to restore certain provisions of the federal Voting Rights Act that were gutted by a 2013 Supreme Court decision. All votes in favor of House Bill 1890 came from Democrats.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Justices take up double jeopardy case

SCOTUSBlog

Last year the Supreme Court set aside a decision by a federal appeals court in Virginia in a challenge to so-called bias-response team policies, procedures created by universities to solicit, track, and investigate reports of bias. In March 2024, the Supreme Court threw out a ruling by the U.S.

Court 97
article thumbnail

2023 is the Year of New Consumer Rights

Diane Drain

September 1, 2023: TILA Disclosures re Index Rates; California Garnishment ; Minnesota Debt Collection December 1, 2023: Bankruptcy December 31, 2023: Utah Data Privacy Musings by Diane Consumer legal protections are rare. – Diane L.

article thumbnail

The Nigerian Court of Appeal declines to enforce a Commonwealth of Virginia (in USA) Choice of Court Agreement

Conflict of Laws

In the first two decisions delivered in the year 2020, the Nigerian Court of Appeal gave full contractual effect to the parties’ foreign choice of court agreement. [2] 3] In this connection, the author is of the view that the Court of Appeal’s decision was delivered per incuriam. This is the focus of this comment.

Court 52
article thumbnail

First Constitutional Challenge to FDA’s Civil Money Penalty Authority

FDA Law Blog

FDA alleged that H&P shipped an unauthorized tobacco product from California and Virginia, in violation of the law, and thus sought an order assessing a civil money penalty against H&P. H&P specifically relies on the Supreme Court decision in Jarkesy , as well as the 2023 Supreme Court decision in Axon Enterprise, Inc.

article thumbnail

Challenges to a Washington state legislative district

SCOTUSBlog

The legality of LD-15, which had an approximately 51.5% Texas mandate that courts deem the standard of “significantly subaverage intellectual functioning” for determining intellectual disability in Atkins v. Hispanic voting-age population, was subject to two different challenges. The suit now known as Trevino v. Florida and Moore v.

Court 94