Court Decisions Litigating Missouri 
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 22, 2022
(The Supreme Court held in 2005 in Deck v. Missouri that such shackling practices violate a defendant’s due process rights.) The answer to that question turned on the relationship between a Supreme Court decision and a congressional statute. In Brecht v.
SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 3, 2021
Three years before Davenport’s trial, the Supreme Court held in Deck v. Missouri that shackling a criminal defendant in front of the jury is inherently prejudicial and violates a defendant’s due process rights unless the state can demonstrate a “special need” to justify the shackling.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently O
NOVEMBER 29, 2023
Jordan is a third-year law student at the University of Missouri and a registered patent agent. Article III standing remains a hot topic at all levels of federal litigation and across many different areas of law. Guest Post by Jordan Duenckel. He has an extensive background in chemistry, food science, and viticulture.
Constitutional Law Reporter
MAY 21, 2024
Louis, Missouri , 601 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that an employee challenging a job transfer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 must show that the transfer brought about some harm with respect to an identifiable term or condition of employment, but that harm need not be significant. City of St.
The Crime Report
JANUARY 4, 2023
But that hasn’t stopped some from promoting his methods and even deploying 911 call analysis in court to win convictions. In 2016, Missouri prosecutor Leah Askey wrote Harpster an effusive email, bluntly detailing how she skirted legal rules to exploit his methods against unwitting defendants. “Of
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
SEPTEMBER 10, 2021
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. The federal district court for the District of Montana is to consider these issues on remand. Missouri v. and non-U.S.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JULY 2, 2021
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. The conservation groups’ appeal of the district court decision is still pending, with the opening brief due on July 12.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
95 
Let's personalize your content