This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Federal Ministers of Indigenous Services and Crown-Indigenous Relations, Patty Hajdu and Marc Miller respectively, along with Attorney General of Canada David Lemetti, released a statement late Friday night announcing that they have agreed with FN groups to come to a resolution on the outstanding issues in the litigation by December of this year.
In that case, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Google. The Fourth Circuit had previously upheld a trial courtdecision that South Carolina waived its Eleventh Amendment protections against subpoenas by participating in the federal lawsuit.
Supreme Court’s October 2022 term ended just a couple of months ago, but it’s already apparent that the decisions are leading to a great deal of litigation. What are the major issues left open by the cases that are likely to be litigated in state and federal courts?
“Judicial Notice (06.26.21): #FreeBritney; Blockbuster Supreme Courtdecisions, a big-ticket litigation finance deal, and other legal news from the week that was.” ” David Lat has this post at his “Original Jurisdiction” Substack site.
The state’s top court upheld fee-shifting of a contingent fee. Analogous logic could apply to the costs of litigation funding. The post Why A Delaware Supreme CourtDecision Affirming Shifting A Contingency Fee To The Losing Party Could Have Applications To Recovering The Costs Of Litigation Funding appeared first on Above the Law.
However, it’s essential to understand that the kind of litigation paralegal role you choose will influence your job satisfaction. This is because some paralegals might prefer a corporate setting as an in-house paralegal, while others might thrive in a law firm setting working in civil litigation or other commercial litigation.
Along with the settlement, Delaware Chancery Court Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick also approved $176.2 It is the fourth-largest fee in Delaware shareholder litigation history, Reuters reported. Looking at the bigger picture, the consequences of the latest Tesla courtdecision in Delaware could radiate beyond the automaker.
“Supreme Court Signals That Landmark Libel Ruling Is Secure; Attacked by two justices, lower-court judges and litigants, the 1964 ruling in New York Times v.
McGills brief argued that a jurisdictional problem (based on the courtsdecision in Badgerow v. It took Roberts 10 separate questions to elicit that admission! The most important thing I got out of the argument is that the justices seem highly motivated to decide the question presented.
The case is in the US District Court for the Central District of California. The judge based his ruling on the two-part test from the US Supreme Courtdecision last year in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. This is not the only litigation involving California gun laws.
This post is an abridged adaptation of my recent article, Private International Law and Substantive Liability Issues in Tort Litigation against Multinational Companies in the English Courts: Recent UK Supreme CourtDecisions and Post-Brexit Implications in the Journal of Private International Law.
Electronically stored information on cellphones, and in particular text messages, can present unique litigation challenges, and recent courtdecisions demonstrate that counsel must carefully balance what data should be preserved, collected, reviewed and produced, say attorneys at Sidley.
In particular, the Court found that it could not impose a concrete minimum emission reduction target on Shell. This blog post explains some of the key takeaways from the appeal, highlighting some critical ground rules laid down by the court which may serve future litigation and several key challenges.
Overturning a district court'sdecision that had earlier vacated the Medicare Advantage Overpayment Rule, the DC Circuit opened a Pandora's Box of DOJ False Claims Act litigation last week.
The fallout has led many companies to consider revising their DEI initiatives to stave off the threat of litigation, particularly concerning board diversity requirements. The post Supreme CourtDecision Complicates Diversity Disclosure Landscape appeared first on Intelligize.
Delaware Chancery Courtdecisions last week touched on foot powder litigation, an AMC settlement and in-person signage as damage control for a postponed hearing. New cases ranged from Amazon sales centers to a fibrosis drug.
Facially, the service looked much like that offered by Aereo, which the Supreme Court determined seven years ago violated federal copyright law by retransmitting TV stations without first obtaining the consent of the copyright holders (see our article here on the Aereo Supreme Courtdecision).
Supreme Court'sdecision on Monday to take up a case about the reach of a Pennsylvania law could have a "seismic impact" on corporate litigation if the justices rule that a state can exercise jurisdiction over companies registered to do business there, legal experts told Law360.
The nation asserts that the city lacks criminal jurisdiction over Native Americans on the tribe’s lands without express congressional authorization, as per the 2020 US Supreme Court case McGirt v.
Could prior Supreme Courtdecisions help eliminate uncertainties in the recall process? That’s an interesting question, because the only courtdecisions regarding a gubernatorial recall aren’t published in the official reports and their precedential effect is questionable.
Speaking for the Constitutional Court, Lady Justice Laurinda Cardoso authorized the National Electoral Commission (CNE) to publish the definitive results of the general elections in the State Gazette once the electoral litigation phase is over.
Supreme Court ruling addressing states' jurisdiction over out-of-state companies and a key ruling in sprawling multidistrict litigation against Silicon Valley's biggest companies over social media addiction are among Law360's top personal injury and medical malpractice cases for 2023.
In this week’s episode, Josh Escovedo and Scott Hervey discuss an update to the litigation over Andy Warhol’s series of portraits of the artist Prince ( Andy Warhol Foundation v Goldsmith). That decision overturned a lower courtdecision in favor of the Warhol Foundation.
Supreme Court'sdecision overturning Chevron deference is that individuals, contractors and companies bringing procurement-related cases against the government will have new pathways toward success, say Joseph Berger and Andrés Vera at Thompson Hine. The net result of the U.S.
Recent federal courtdecisions in the Fearless Fund and Hello Alice cases shed new light on the ongoing wave of challenges to diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, with opposite conclusions on whether the plaintiffs had standing to sue, say attorneys at Moore & Van Allen.
This means that issues decided at the district or administrative court level can be binding on all other courts: district courts, administrative courts, appellate courts, and even the Supreme Court. District courtdecisions are not binding precedent because they are at the bottom.
Litigants shouldn’t get to choose the judge who decides their case. Judge shopping, we’ve argued elsewhere , raises concerns about court bias and capture and can make litigation unnecessarily costly and inefficient. But it’s also specious to claim that the Federal Circuit’s mandamus practice indicates court capture by big tech.
Supreme Court'sdecision may signal a general trend away from agency deference even on the complex technical issues that often arise, say Kayleigh Scalzo and Andrew Guy at Covington.
This blog post discusses the case and its implications for future climate litigation and policy in Czechia. First Dismissal by the Supreme Administrative Court In February 2023, the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic overturned the Prague Municipal Courtsdecision and returned the case for further proceedings.
The question before them is whether to uphold the judgment of a lower court that awarded damages for profits earned not only by the entity named as a defendant in the lawsuit, but also by several other entities that were not parties to the litigation.
Supreme Court'sdecision in Polansky v. Executive Health Resources reaffirms that the government has final say in False Claims Act cases, allowing for meaningful guardrails that deter private litigators from seeking to regulate industries that Congress has delegated to expert administrative agencies, say attorneys at Ropes & Gray.
Supreme Court'sdecision in Facebook v. Although the U.S. Duguid closes one door to potential Telephone Consumer Protection Act lawsuits, Florida's newly amended state law — featuring a broader autodialer definition — has opened another, say attorneys at Buchanan Ingersoll.
The first week of July 2022 brought on several major developments in climate litigation in the Netherlands, with possibly significant ramifications for a new type of global climate litigation. This “splash” of misleading advertisement cases (rather than a “wave”) seems to be a fairly new phenomenon in climate litigation.
He contended that language at issue in this case is quite similar to both the Hobbs Act, which bars robbery and extortion, and the general law governing venue in federal courts, all of which have been construed to allow just one party to establish venue. A decision in the case is expected by summer.
Supreme Court'sdecision in Dewberry v. Dewberry hones in on the question of how a defendant's affiliates' profits should be treated under the Lanham Act, and should remind trademark litigants and practitioners that issues involving monetary relief should be treated seriously, say attorneys at Finnegan.
Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma , the court held that the NCAA could, in the interest of preserving the character and quality of college sports, impose restrictions upon players that would otherwise breach antitrust laws. ” The court also granted certiorari in TransUnion LLC v.
In this attempt to redistribute domestic litigation, the Brazilian legislator may well have thrown out the baby, international forum selection clauses, with the bathwater. courts prior to the landmark U.S. Supreme Courtdecision in Bremen v Zapata Off-Shore Co. How this will play out in practice remains to be seen.
A three-judge Ninth Circuit panel on Monday upheld a lower court'sdecision to cut more than $2 million from plaintiff's firm Cooper & Kirkham's $3.452 million fee award in a multidistrict litigation settlement over alleged cathode ray tube price-fixing litigation.
Gonzalez — The annual Enforcement, Litigation, and Compliance Conference put on by the Food and Drug Law Institute (“FDLI”) took place in Washington this week. FTC Supreme Courtdecision stripping FTC of its ability to obtain restitution or disgorgement under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. By Steven J.
Share The Supreme Court doesn’t care all that much for method-of-execution challenges. It particularly disfavors Eighth Amendment litigation attacking familiar lethal injection protocols as “cruel and unusual” punishment. Nance committed a murder after a botched bank robbery, and he was sentenced to death in 1997.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content