This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge Monday to the appellate courtdecision that struck down Minnesota law prohibiting adults aged 18-20 from obtaining a permit to own guns and carry them in public. ” said Second Amendment Foundation founder and Executive Vice President Alan M.
Last week, building electrification secured an important victory in the United States District Court for the Southern District of NewYork. In Association of Contracting Plumbers of The City of NewYork, Inc. Judge Abrams Decision in Association of Contracting Plumbers of The City of NewYork, Inc.
“Supreme Court Signals That Landmark Libel Ruling Is Secure; Attacked by two justices, lower-court judges and litigants, the 1964 ruling in NewYork Times v.
The judge based his ruling on the two-part test from the US Supreme Courtdecision last year in NewYork State Rifle and Pistol Association v. This is not the only litigation involving California gun laws. Carney found that the California law violates the Second Amendment of the US Constitution.
Last January, the Supreme Court refused to disturb an order by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit that temporarily allowed NewYork to enforce a new concealed-carry law while multiple challenges to the law proceed. But the court did not specify exactly what history courts must look to.
In recent weeks, decisions of a US District Court judge in the Southern District of NewYork led to the suspension of service by the Internet streaming company Locast, which built its business on streaming local television stations generally without obtaining the consent of TV stations or the copyright holders in the programs they broadcast.
A year-long study of young people living in at-risk neighborhoods in NewYork City found that fears for personal safety, and fears of police, were the primary motivations for carrying a firearm. The recent study by the Center for Court Innovation surveyed 330 youth aged 16-24, a majority of them men of color.
In June this year, a new statutory provision came into force, adding, unexpectedly, new requirements for their enforceability. In this attempt to redistribute domestic litigation, the Brazilian legislator may well have thrown out the baby, international forum selection clauses, with the bathwater.
A NewYork federal court'sdecision to exclude all plaintiff experts in a multidistrict litigation concerning prenatal exposure to Tylenol highlights a number of expert testimony pitfalls that parties should avoid in product liability and mass tort matters, say Rand Brothers and Courtney Block at Winston & Strawn.
The argument revealed a bench deeply skeptical of the uncertainty maritime insurance contracts would face under a lower-courtdecision limiting the enforcement of choice-of-law clauses in those contracts. The contract, like most American marine insurance contracts, called for the application of NewYork law.
A recent trial courtdecision offers some encouragement for certain businesses facing the ongoing wave of litigation in which plaintiffs are asserting claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
In 2021, the District Court ruled that the Berkeley ordinance was not preempted by EPCA , rejecting the notion that EPCA preempts local ordinances that do “not facially address any of those [energy conservation or energy use] standards.” NewYork is located in the Second Circuit, further insulating it from the CRA v.
Grubhub, Postmates and Uber along with customers suing the companies jointly urged a NewYork federal court on Thursday to pause the case following a U.S.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Climate Litigation Chart (Update #92): FEATURED CASE. and non-U.S. Here are the additions to the U.S. Pritzker , Nos.
Last week, the two wrote in the NewYork Times that it would violate the federal constitution to have a replacement candidate become governor if he or she received fewer votes than the number of votes cast against recalling Newsom. Are two unpublished Supreme Courtdecisions on recall elections precedential?
The thing about famous trademarks is that they make strong images in people minds,” he told the NewYork Times , “but when consumers see imitations without the ability to compare products side by side, there is a resonance, there is a recognition: ‘Oh, is that Adidas?’“. The Dutch Supreme Courtdecision brings the case to an end.
The defendant-appellant moved to compel the arbitration and stay the litigation since there was an arbitration clause contained withing the partnership deed. The court therefore, declined again to apply the Indian Law and instead applied federal substantive law and ordinary contract and agency principles.
As always, we endeavor to collect all Chinese courtdecisions involving the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments (“REFJ”), and foreign counterparts concerning the recognition and enforcement of Chinese judgments. Dawei Gongsun, Partner at DGW Kramer LLP (NewYork). [1]
This week, the US Court of Appeals essentially ended Flo and Eddie’s NewYork case against Sirius XM where it tried to establish a public performance royalty in pre-1972 sound recordings.
In the interim, the radio industry is negotiating new royalties with both of these organizations, as the current license agreements expire at the end of this year (see our article here ). Rates under the settlements, which will be decided by arbitration if not resolved by negotiation, are currently being worked on.
As always, we endeavor to collect all Chinese courtdecisions involving the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments (“REFJ”), and foreign counterparts concerning the recognition and enforcement of Chinese judgments. Dawei Gongsun, Partner at DGW Kramer LLP (NewYork).
The decision looks like a simple premise that digitization is no magic bullet to defeat pre-1972 sound recording claims, but there is much to unpack in this seemingly straightforward decision. First, we need to provide a little background on the litigation over pre-1972 sound recordings.
As always, we endeavor to collect all Chinese courtdecisions involving the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments (“REFJ”), and foreign counterparts concerning the recognition and enforcement of Chinese judgments. The Case List is made available for our readers to build reasonable expectations on REFJ in China.
The Florida case has been referred to that state’s highest court for an advisory ruling on the state of the state’s law on the issue, and earlier this week, the same thing happened in California. The music battle continues over the question of whether state laws provide a public performance right in pre-1972 sound recordings.
In total, at least 25 cases have been filed in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai’i, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, NewYork, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Vermont. The Supreme Court sided with the fossil fuel company defendants, ruling that appellate courts could review all grounds of the remand order.
These courts will not, however, enforce a clause when it is unreasonable or contrary to public policy. The state courts in Florida and Connecticut have become more likely to enforce in recent years. The state courts in Georgia have become less likely to enforce in recent years. They apply federal common law.
This case reached the Florida Supreme Court when it was certified by the United State Court of Appeals which was reviewing a District Courtdecision reaching the same conclusion as did the Florida Supreme Court – that there was no performance right under state law for pre-1972 sound recordings (see our summary of the District Courtdecision here ).
It may mean that Sirius was tired of the litigation, and wanted to buy peace, at least with the major labels. The litigation may also have been interfering with other business between the company and the labels, so peace may have brought some security. What does this settlement mean?
Border Patrol agent, that a Turkish national, arriving in Seattle by way of NewYork, had scheduled transportation to Smuggler’s Inn. Often, Boule would agree to help illegal border crossers enter or exit the United States, only to later call federal agents to report the unlawful activity. Anderson v. Creighton , 483 U.S. 635 (1987).
Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. NewYork Trial Court Set Parameters for Exxon’s Compliance with Attorney General’s Climate Change Investigation.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. On November 23, GM announced that it was withdrawing from the litigation. NewYork v. and non-U.S.
Therefore, the discrepancy between pre-decision opinion and final award does not amount to annulment of the award. [xv]. The abovementioned courtdecisions are somehow problematic: the pre-decision notification is by no means a mere investigating tool for the tribunal. Preference of Parties.
Several of them are sequels to earlier high courtdecisions. First Amendment The current court is very solicitous of First Amendment rights. The Farm Bureau and North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein ask the court to grant review and reverse the 4th Circuit’s decision. NewYork and 335-7 LLC v.
Jean Mohamed: Die aktienrechtliche actio pro socio im globalen Kontext – Zur Abgrenzung von materiellem Recht und Verfahrensrecht im anglo-amerikanischen Rechtskreis am Beispiel der derivative action in NewYork. courts for use in foreign proceedings. Paul Achleitner et al.,
Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the NewYork Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, The Value of a New Judgments Convention for U.S. Coco, Sarah E. Cuniberti, Gilles.
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? rs-953987/v1 ).
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? rs-953987/v1 ).
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? rs-953987/v1 ).
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? rs-953987/v1 ).
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? rs-953987/v1 ).
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? rs-953987/v1 ).
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? rs-953987/v1 ).
Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vis-a-vis International Commercial Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Resolution”, Journal of Dispute Resolution 2022-02, pp. Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation?
The court of appeals relied on the Supreme Courts 1968 decision in Ginsberg v. NewYork holding that states may restrict young peoples access to sexual materials that are harmful to them. Therefore, Texas concludes, the Supreme Court should retain that status quo while litigation continues.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content