Remove Court Decisions Remove Litigation Remove Statute
article thumbnail

US Supreme Court declines to review Minnesota handgun possession age restrictions unconstitutional ruling

JURIST

The US Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge Monday to the appellate court decision that struck down Minnesota law prohibiting adults aged 18-20 from obtaining a permit to own guns and carry them in public. ” said Second Amendment Foundation founder and Executive Vice President Alan M.

Court 104
article thumbnail

Justices debate right to renew lawsuit after voluntary dismissal

SCOTUSBlog

McGills brief argued that a jurisdictional problem (based on the courts decision in Badgerow v. It took Roberts 10 separate questions to elicit that admission! The most important thing I got out of the argument is that the justices seem highly motivated to decide the question presented.

Statute 103
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Justices will revisit whether certain noncitizens in lengthy detention are entitled to bond hearings

SCOTUSBlog

The Supreme Court previously held that the post-removal statute contains an implicit time limit. Davis , a 2001 decision, the court read that provision to prohibit detention beyond six months for noncitizens ordered removed when their removal is not “reasonably foreseeable.” In Zadvydas v. Rodriguez and Johnson v.

article thumbnail

The 340B Showdown: HRSA Proceeds Towards Enforcement Despite Litigation

FDA Law Blog

HRSA based its opinion on the statute and agency precedents over the last 25 years. Judge Stark found that, although HRSA’s interpretation of the statute was permissible, the Advisory Opinion unjustifiably assumed that Congress imposed this interpretation as a statutory requirement. A decision is expected in the coming months.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court likely to let vape company’s FDA challenge proceed

SCOTUSBlog

As a practical matter, he asked Suri, why is it inconvenient for the government to litigate in one circuit instead of another? Suri told the justices that this was not a question of convenience, but instead about Congresss choice in the statute to delineate where cases can be brought. A decision in the case is expected by summer.

Court 88
article thumbnail

Restoring the America Invents Act

Patently O

The statute would create a rebuttable presumption of consolidation. The new statute would list factors that a district court should consider when determining whether or not to grant a stay, all the changes would tend to promote stays of the litigation. Expanding the Scope of Inter Partes Review.

Statute 94
article thumbnail

Justices rule lower courts must put trial proceedings on hold during arbitration appeal

SCOTUSBlog

The case turns on a 1988 amendment to the Federal Arbitration Act, which added the current Section 16(a) to that statute. Kavanaugh reasoned that when “the question on appeal is whether the case belongs in arbitration or instead in the district court, the entire case is essentially ‘involved in the appeal.’”

Court 100