This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday morning declined to put a Louisiana trial seeking compensation for the “existential threat” posed by coastal land loss on hold while the defendants in the case, a group of oil companies, seek review of a state courtdecision rejecting their request to transfer the case.
The ruling comes after a 2020 US Supreme Courtdecision that held non-unanimous jury verdicts violate the US Constitution’s Sixth Amendment. The petitioner was convicted of crimes in Oregon by nonunanimous juries before the US Supreme Court issued its decision in Ramos v.
His legacy is tied to a Supreme Courtdecision that upheld the ‘separate but equal’ doctrine, underpinning laws that segregated and disenfranchised African Americans for decades.” “Homer Plessy’s Arrest in 1892 Led to a Landmark Ruling. Now He May Get Justice.
“Ban on Non-Unanimous Verdicts Is Not Retroactive, Supreme Court Rules; The 6-to-3 decision, a sequel to a ruling last year, affects thousands of prisoners in Louisiana and Oregon”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. Supreme Court refuses to make Louisiana ban on non-unanimous juries retroactive.”
The Americans United Against Separation of Church and State stated that the Oklahoma Supreme Courtdecision “ safeguards public education and upholds the separation of religion and government.”
Alabama (2012), the court ruled that mandatory life in prison without parole for juvenile offenders was cruel and unusual punishment, violating the Eighth Amendment. Four years later, in Montgomery v.
Supreme Court has agreed to consider a closely watched Louisiana redistricting dispute involving a map that created a second majority-Black congressional district in the state. The two cases, Louisiana v. Callais and Robinson v. In the first round of redistricting litigation, Robinson, et al v.
Share The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to impose new restrictions on the ability of states to sentence juveniles to life without parole, rejecting a challenge from a Mississippi man, Brett Jones, who was convicted of the 2004 stabbing death of his grandfather, a crime committed when Jones was 15.
Share At oral arguments earlier this week the Supreme Court was skeptical of the Food and Drug Administrations effort to block a North Carolina-based company from challenging the denial of its application to market e-cigarettes in the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in Louisiana.
The Fifth Circuit rejected a COVID-19 coverage appeal from a group of dental practices, finding that a recent Louisiana Supreme Courtdecision prevents coverage.
The update is that the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces has decided United States v. The unanimous court decided that there was still no constitutional requirement for a unanimous court-martial verdict, despite the Supreme Courtdecision in Ramos v.
By allowing judges to ignore such considerations when sentencing a young person to die behind bars, the recent Supreme Courtdecision promises to further inequity. Since 2012, Louisiana has sentenced 57 percent of eligible juvenile offenders to life without parole compared to fewer than 2 percent in Pennsylvania.
An increasing number of Americans now believe US Supreme Courtdecision-making is based more on political ideology than the rule of law. Evidence that this disturbing trend is true can be found when taking a closer look at the shift in how the Court has dealt with juvenile cases dating back to 2005.
Besides Minnesota, the area includes Arkansas, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Texas. In effect, this means that nearly 60 million Americans live in states where the courts offer absolute immunity to federal officers who violate someone’s constitutional rights.
Thirty-six years passed between Williams’ 1982 crime and his 2018 resentencing to life imprisonment, plus 60 years, after a courtdecision vacated his death sentence. Billy Sinclair spent 40 years in the Louisiana prison system, six of which were on death row. He was sentenced to death in 1983 for Shirley’s murder. ”
Reaction to the Furman decision was swift. Some states, such as Louisiana and North Carolina, enacted mandatory death penalty statutes, eliminating discretion entirely from the death penalty system. Death penalty states worked hard to discern its meaning and to ascertain what they could do to restore capital punishment.
Six states have enacted contract pharmacy protections into law: Kansas , Maryland , Mississippi , and West Virginia in 2024, Louisiana in 2023, and Arkansas in 2021. Courtdecision, may be rendered inconsequential. Bills are pending in other states, including Missouri and New York.
Judge Terry Douglas of the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana Tuesday blocked a federal COVID-19 vaccine mandate for US health care workers. The injunction follows a Missouri district courtdecision to block the mandate in 10 states that was granted Monday.
These rates were calculated by dividing (1) the total number of cases where a clause was enforced by (2) the total number of cases where the court considered the issue of enforceability. In theory, the fact that the federal courts apply federal common law to this question should produce uniform results across the nation.
I spent more than 40 years in the Louisiana penal system—from December 1965 to April 2006. I was transferred from the “parish jail” to the Louisiana State Penitentiary in November 1966. Supreme Court seeking review of the Fifth Circuit decision in the Hope case. I know a thing or two about solitary confinement.
Their cases are about the failure of justice in the Louisiana criminal justice system. I know Louisiana justice. Both were committed to the Louisiana prison system with life sentences. Henry was committed to the Louisiana State Penitentiary when the prison—more commonly known as Angola—was the “bloodiest prison in America.”.
I first stumbled on 911 call analysis while reporting on a police department in northern Louisiana. When they hear it,” a prosecutor in Louisiana once told Harpster, “it will be like a Dr. Phil ‘a-ha’ moment.” She has denied allegations of misconduct in other media interviews. I was wrong.
Was the Supreme Courtdecision last month overruling Roe v. Wade one of the worst decisions in the 233-year history of the Court? The Louisiana Supreme Court refused to throw out the charge against Plessy, his case ended up before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Half of all incarcerated people serving LWOP are located in one of five states included in the review: California, Florida, Louisiana, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Report authors highlighted a recent Supreme Courtdecision in Canada. Florida has the highest count of incarcerated people serving life without parole sentences.
If the justices grant the petition, it would be the first time the Supreme Court addresses the First Amendment implications of secret audio recordings. In Louisiana v. Louisiana v. The next free-speech challenge involves the limits of the First Amendment’s prohibition on compelled speech.
A Louisiana judge rejected President Joe Biden’s push to end Title 42, which restricted access of would-be asylum seekers to the U.S. The Mexican Supreme Courtdecision came after immigration officers arrested three Indigenous Mexican migrants – all under the age of 24 – for how they looked, dressed, and their minimal Spanish use.
The court may soon decide to answer that question. Amant, Louisiana. The trial court admitted evidence that the government had knowingly failed to disclose Gladys Mobley’s connection and denied the state’s motion to dismiss Granier’s petition. And as it happens, his mother Gladys Mobley sat on the jury that convicted Granier.
Share The Supreme Court will hear arguments early next year in the latest chapter in a protracted dispute over race and redistricting in Louisiana. Alabama had asked the justices to reverse an appeals courtdecision that lifted Smith’s death sentence. Louisiana v. 5 until Nov. Callais and Robinson v.
Supreme Court ruled that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge a Biden Administration immigration enforcement policy. According to the eight-member majority, “federal courts are generally not the proper forum for resolving claims that the Executive Branch should make more arrests or bring more prosecutions.”
A Hawaii court held that the Hawai‘i Environmental Policy Act requires environmental review for commercial taking of aquarium fish and that Department of Land and Natural Resources issuance and renewal of licenses for commercial aquarium collection without environmental review was invalid and illegal.
The US Supreme Court issued a stay order Wednesday blocking a lower courtdecision that would have prevented using a newly drawn Louisiana congressional district map that includes two majority black districts in the six-district state. The order itself did not contain any reasoning for issuing the stay. .”
Lujan Grisham signed the order in response to the US Supreme Courtdecision in Dobbs v. The day the ruling came down, Lujan Grisham put out a statement explaining how New Mexico prepared in anticipation of the decision. The order protects those who provide abortion services from out-of-state civil or criminal liability.
Louisiana , the U.S. District Courts in Louisiana and Kentucky agreed with the plaintiffs and preliminarily enjoined enforcement of the rule in the plaintiff States. In Department of Education v.
The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled Thursday that a federal statute requiring people to be 21 to purchase handguns from Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) conflicts with previous Supreme Courtdecisions and the Second Amendment.
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in Louisiana. If the lower courtsdecision allowing RJR Vapors case to go forward stands, the FDA says, other manufacturers will also try to get around the restrictions that federal law imposes on where such challenges can be filed. The company, R.J.
In its petition, Great Lakes claims that choice of law under federal admiralty has been utter chaos since a 1955 Supreme Courtdecision , made tolerable only by strict enforcement of choice-of-law clauses. It argues that the 3rd Circuit’s decision has thrown all of that into upheaval and must be reviewed. New Relists Brown v.
This begs the question of what is genuinely considered as an “emergency decision,” as opposed to a decision that the court is trying to make hastily with little fanfare. Decisions that could have significant ramifications on Americans must be heard on a more substantive level. Louisiana v. American Rivers.
The question came to the court in the case of Natoya Cunningham , who was convicted by a six-person jury and sentenced to eight years in prison. A Florida state court upheld Cunningham’s conviction. It pointed to another recent state courtdecision that rejected a defendant’s challenge to the constitutionality of a six-person jury.
Here is a full list of the cases set for argument during the March argument session: Louisiana v. Callais ) (March 24) A challenge to a lower courtsdecision to strike down a map that created a second majority-Black congressional district in the state. Callais (consolidated with Robinson v.
The Ninth Circuit said the new issuance of NWP 12 rendered the appeals moot and ordered the district court to dismiss the underlying claim. The Ninth Circuit declined, however, to take a position on whether the underlying cases were moot in their entirety and also declined to vacate any district courtdecisions. Louisiana v.
Judicial factfinding for restitution Under Apprendi v. New Jersey , [o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
Under the Supreme Courtdecision Allen v. Rights groups have recently challenged redistricting maps in Georgia , Tennessee , North Dakota , Louisiana , Alabama , and South Carolina. Milligan , states are required to consider racial criteria when redistricting to avoid diluting the voting power of protected groups.
Having lived through Dred Scott , he was deeply conscious of how mistakes by the court could lead to terrible outcomes. Comparing courtdecisions with which he disagreed to Dred Scott was almost a reflexive tactic of his. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. He really wrestled with the facts. In Plessy v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content