This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
“Religious schools haven’t yet sought public funding in Maine after Supreme Courtdecision”: Robbie Feinberg of Maine Public Radio has this report. The post “Religious schools haven’t yet sought public funding in Maine after Supreme Courtdecision” appeared first on How Appealing.
“Maine must stop trying to bypass Supreme Courtdecision on schools; The outcome in Carson v. The post “Maine must stop trying to bypass Supreme Courtdecision on schools; The outcome in Carson v. ” Courtney Jones has this essay online at The Portland (Me.) Press Herald.
“Statue of Maine judge who upheld segregation laws will be removed in Augusta”: Nick Schroeder of The Bangor Daily News has a report that begins, “The statue of a Maine-born chief justice who voted to uphold a landmark Supreme Courtdecision that institutionalized racial segregation will be removed from the Kennebec Courthouse lawn.” (..)
It covers the trends, people and finances of the legal profession from Wall Street to Main Street to Pennsylvania Avenue. The ABA Journal is read by half of the nation's 1 million lawyers every month.
The main substantive debate in which the justices engaged was whether the voluntary dismissal of the original case was the kind of final proceeding to which Rule 60(b) would apply. McGills brief argued that a jurisdictional problem (based on the courtsdecision in Badgerow v.
A Texas federal district judge issued a preliminary injunction on Wednesday that ordered Texas to move its floating barrier from the Rio Grande’s main waters to the riverbank. The DOJ sued pursuant to its enforcement powers in the Rivers and Harbors Act. This ruling is incorrect and will be overturned on appeal.
Religious schools haven’t yet sought public funding in Maine after Supreme Courtdecision (Robbie Feinberg, Maine Public). America tussles over a newly fashionable constitutional theory (Steven Mazie, The Economist). Vogue on KBJ and ACB (Josh Blackman, The Volokh Conspiracy). 19 appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
Solicitor General has criticized a divided California Supreme Courtdecision that interpreted federal law so as to increase the amount of a rental subsidy for certain families. The Supreme Court’s August 2020 decision in Reilly v. Marin Housing Authority (2020) 10 Cal.5th
One of the main goals of the incoming Netanyahu government is major judicial reform. The plan would replace the current Judicial Selection Committee, under which elected officials, senior judicial figures, and legal professionals share responsibility for appointing the 15 Supreme Court justices.
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Supreme Court’s ruling against Maine could reshape religion’s role in public life (Caitlin Andrews, Bangor Daily News). Religion, Schools and the Supreme Court (Editorial, The Wall Street Journal). John Roberts played the long game on state funding of religious schools (Joan Biskupic, CNN).
But the court explained that it was “not convinced, however, that Laufer abandoned her case in an effort to evade our review,” and it added that it might “exercise our discretion differently in a future case.” This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.
The plaintiffs, partially successful in the first instance court (see here ), have already filed a constitutional complaint with the Czech Constitutional Court. Meanwhile, the process of updating the Czech Climate Protection Policy, the main national document regarding climate protection, was halted due to this years elections.
We’d all been working for over a year on a contract that would make it possible, someday in the future, for everyone to have free and open access to all the official courtdecisions ever published in the United States. state and federal courtdecisions representing the bulk of our nation’s common law. This was not easy.
Until very recently, Brazilian courts would not enforce a clause that selected a foreign forum, arguing that parties could not, by agreement, oust the jurisdiction of Brazilian courts established by law — an approach quite similar to that adopted by U.S. courts prior to the landmark U.S.
The main difference is that instead of describing “Old No. Jack Daniel’s relies in particular on a Supreme Courtdecision that allowed the United States Olympic Committee to enjoin the “Gay Olympics” even without proof of confusion. 2 on your Tennessee carpet.”
Kavanaugh reasoned that when “the question on appeal is whether the case belongs in arbitration or instead in the district court, the entire case is essentially ‘involved in the appeal.’” Kavanaugh buttressed the majority’s conclusion with quotes from lower-courtdecisions and the leading treatises on federal procedure.
7] Choice of venue rules are used to determine which judicial division within a State (in the case of the State High Court) or judicial division within the Nigerian Federation (in the case of the Federal High Court) has jurisdiction. Choice of venue rules are mainly utilised for geographical and administrative convenience.
As Chief Justice explained: The application of such a test, however, would often turn on arcane riddles about the nature of a company’s services. Does a pizza delivery company derive its revenue mainly from pizza or delivery?
. —————————————— The 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition of Foreign Judgments will make it possible for foreign, non-EU, decisions to be recognized under common terms in EU jurisdictions, and vice versa. PA, with a case comment by Judge Ms.
This aspect of the ruling holds particular significance as lower courts have not always consistently demonstrated sufficient awareness of Morocco’s obligations under the1996 HCCH Conventions. Meknes Court of Appeal, Ruling No. 87 of 14 January 2013 ( ibid ); idem , Ruling No.
The Execution Court granted the petition and ordered the enforcement of the English judgment. The decision was confirmed on appeal. It is likely, however, that the courts relied on the MOJ letter to reach this conclusion. Y appealed to the DSC. 3) The parties have not (yet) been divorced under Pakistani law or Islamic Sharia.
In the remainder of this post, I discuss the process that led the tribunal to base the opinion on the various scientific reports consulted and argue that the use and interpretation of scientific research can facilitate and improve courtdecisions.
Following Professor Zhao’s presentation, Mr Alexander Blumrosen, Partner at Polaris Law (Paris), provided a historical account of the use of the Evidence Convention in the United States and the significance of the landmark Supreme Courtdecision Aérospatiale.
Finally, it should be indicated that the position of the Bahraini courts on this issue is broadly similar to that of other countries in the region, as noted in the Introduction. For example, in the aforementioned Supreme Courtdecision in the Appeal No. 2, 2019, pp.
Lagoudi; Court of First Instance Korinthos No 1/2022, on the topic of parental care and maintenance of an out-of-marriage minor by parents of foreign citizenship, with commentary by Dr. G.-A. The ‘Praefatio’ of this Lex&Forum issue has the great honor of hosting the valuable thoughts of the former President of the CJEU (2003-2015), Prof.
The monograph predominantly examines 19 Indonesian courtdecisions on choice of law in international commercial contracts during the period, 2000-2020. This decision has since been followed by many Indonesian judges. A robust and clearly expressed methodology of doctrinal and empirical research is applied.
But the main takeaway from this FIE expiration determination is that it’s only interchangeable approval and litigation that count towards the FIE expiration calculations. But because the statute sets FIE expiration at the earlier of the relevant conditions, the April 15, 2023 and September 28, 2023 dates were the FIE expiration dates.
Its main objective is to promote the study of private international law and encourage cooperation with similar academic institutions abroad, as well as coordination among private international law scholars. It suggests that Japan might consider recognizing parentage through foreign decisions. Gakkai ) (hereinafter “PILAJ”).
Overall, however, there was a substantial drop in the number of merits decisions: 532 in 2022, as compared with 643 in 2021. Decisions from all origins actually dropped slightly, but the biggest drop was in the number of decisions arising from the PTO was the main reason: 147 in 2022 as compared with 216 in 2021.
Building on the comments, the present article authored by the members of the Marburg Group focuses on the main points of critique and considers the present state of discussion on the proposed Regulation.
Supreme Courtdecision in March 2021 in Ford vs. Montana now permits the exercise of specific jurisdiction when the claim arises out of or is (sufficiently) “related” to the defendant’s in-state contacts and activities. The decision also deals with questions of German procedural law. The long-awaited U.S.
An international arbitral tribunal, which was aware of the lie, nevertheless credited the main parts of Guerra’s testimony. In later proceedings, Judge Guerra admitted that he had lied to Chevron about the amount of the bribe he had been offered. And Donziger never appealed from the US judge’s findings of fact.
The main studio rules themselves are viewed by some as being an anachronism by many broadcasters. Over the years, the FCC has eliminated rules that require specific amounts of programming originated from main studios.
The Supreme Courtdecision in Andy Warhol Foundation v. The Supreme Court in Campbell v. Goldsmith changed the way fair use is analyzed. In determining fair use, four factors are examined. The first fair use factor examines the purpose and character of the use. Some guidance may be found in Sofa Entertainment.
The main complaint then is that, by not being able to guarantee that CO 2 emissions for a flight can be meaningfully offset, the airline wrongly creates the impression that flying “responsibly” is possible. The new “greenwashing advertisement” court case FossielVrij NL v. At the same time, FossielVrij NL v.
This means that the federal courts are free to adopt their own view of whether a clause is unreasonable or contrary to public policy without considering prior state courtdecisions. In theory, the fact that the federal courts apply federal common law to this question should produce uniform results across the nation.
Professor Martin Gebauer (University of Tbingen) explored three main themes: striking parallels in time and content, strong contrasts, and finally the tensions in characterisation. Three main examples were given: first, Pertegs Sender explained that drafters increasingly employ provisions that regulate the scope of a Convention.
The present case has already yielded an important Supreme Courtdecision rendered on 18 January 2019 (decision available here ). The main issue that was addressed therein concerned the compatibility of the foreign judgment with the procedural public policy of Japan.
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the courtsdecision, complaining that it had agreed to rewrite statutory text. Justice Samuel Alito wrote his own dissent in which he contended that his colleagues had resolved the dispute based on an issue that the lower court had not reached and the parties had not really addressed.
In its decision of 11 March 2021, the Cologne Higher Regional Court denied the international jurisdiction of the Cologne courts for permission proceedings under the German Telemedia Act (TMG) in cases of suspected abusive customer complaints in online marketplaces. The starting point is the fraudulent car purchase.
Introduction In a previous post , I reported and commented on a decision rendered by the Abu Dhabi Supreme Court (hereinafter “ADSC”) in which the Court addressed the issue of the applicability of the Abu Dhabi Civil Marriage Law (Law No. Comments Two main issues deserve to be particularly highlighted here.
The decision also vacated an injunction from the Northern District of New York and a prior Second Circuit ruling on an Eastern District of New York case. While the two lower courtdecisions originate from different jurisdictions, both pertain to healthcare workers’ concerns over the COVID-19 vaccine.
Instead, he argued, state courts can only enforce procedural limits on the legislature’s authority. Members of the court saw two main problems with Thompson’s argument. The first was the Supreme Court’s own precedent. David Thompson argues for North Carolina Republican legislators. William Hennessy).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content