This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Deutsche Umwelthilfe Federal Managing Director stated that the “new vehicles from Mercedes have the highest CO2 emissions of all manufacturers in Europe” and “the German car manufacturers have been preventing effective climate protection laws for decades.”
This opinion, which overrules a Fifth Circuit decision that FDA had acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying premarket tobacco product applications submitted by manufacturers of flavored e-liquids for open-system e-cigarettes, marks the latest development in the ongoing debate and FDA regulation of flavored vape products.
The US Court of Appeal for the Fifth Circuit blocked an appeal Friday from Texas gun owners and state Attorney General Ken Paxton seeking judicial approval of a Texas gun law that exempts the state from federal firearm silencer regulations. Standing is a doctrine that courts require for an individual’s grievance to be heard.
The Federal Court of Canada delivered a decision on Thursday overturning the federal government’s order to list plastic-manufactured items (PMIs) under Schedule 1 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act 1999 (CEPA).
Kirschenbaum — Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act does not prohibit pharmaceutical manufacturers from imposing conditions on the distribution of discounted drugs to covered entities in the program. In United Therapeutics Corporation v.
The question comes to the court as part of the FDAs efforts to regulate the multibillion-dollar vaping industry. What arguments could you raise, she queried, that would be different than the manufacturer? A decision in the case is expected by summer. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.
Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether Mexican government may continue its lawsuit against U.S. gun manufacturers. Estados Unidos Mexicanos , alleges the manufacturers aided and abetted the illegal sales of guns to traffickers for cartels in Mexico. gun manufacturers and one gun distributor. In appealing to the U.S.
The Supreme Court of Korea found on Thursday that shipbuilder Hitachi Zosen Corp. and heavy equipment manufacturer Mitsubishi Heavy Industries owe 50 million won (approx. The court’s Thursday ruling upheld two lower courtdecisions. The same court then found the same for Mitsubishi Heavy in June 2019.
Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. process that the machine or manufacture perform. ‘(B) B) HUMAN GENES AND NATURAL MATERIALS.
The case involves a dispute between Jack Daniel’s (the largest American whiskey manufacturer) and VIP Products (the second-largest American dog toy manufacturer). 7 Tennessee Sour Mash Whiskey” manufactured by “Jack Daniel’s,” the toy refers to a “Bad Spaniel” that makes “Old No. 2 on your Tennessee carpet.”
Koblitz — You know a courtdecision is going to be worth reading when the judges compare FDA’s regulatory governance of flavored e-cigarettes to a Shakespearean gaslighting. Let’s just say, the smackdown—er, decision—eviscerates FDA’s approach to regulating flavored e-cigarettes. By David B. Clissold & Sara W.
The Court viewed this structure as evidence that Congress intended to preempt state regulations that bear on the performance of a [covered] product as manufactured. District Court for the Northern District of California, which ruled that EPCA did not preempt Berkleys ordinance. A trade group first challenged the law in the U.S.
A San Francisco federal judge mulling tracking device manufacturer Tile Inc.'s s bid to arbitrate some claims that its Bluetooth trackers are dangerous because they empower stalkers asked the parties at a hearing Tuesday to brief her on the effect of a recent California appellate courtdecision regarding arbitrability.
Chip manufacturer Nvidia Corp. Supreme Court victory over investors who accuse the company of downplaying its reliance on the crypto mining market, arguing that a lower courtdecision allowing the case to move forward "eviscerates the guardrails that Congress erected to protect the public from abusive securities litigation."
Last month the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’sdecision to dismiss a False Claims Act (FCA) ( 21 U.S.C 3729) quit tam suit, alleging that Grifols USA, Grifols Biologicals, Grifols, S.A.,
Having received guidance from the Texas Supreme Court that Amazon cannot be held liable for third-party products that are shipped and fulfilled by Amazon, but not manufactured by the company under its brand, the Fifth Circuit on Tuesday reversed a lower court'sdecision that Amazon is a "seller" under the state's law.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Brown v. Nexus Business Solutions, LLC affirmed a district court'sdecision that business development managers who solicited and sold General Motors. On April 1, 2022, the U.S.
Gaulkin — On April 10, the Fourth Circuit unanimously affirmed a summary judgment ruling for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding the agency’s definitions of “line-extension drug” and “new formulation” for purposes of determining rebates that drug manufacturers may owe the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP).
CMS itself has recognized this by repeatedly inviting manufacturers to use reasonable assumptions where a question is not addressed in the statute, regulations, or CMS guidance. The AMP, best price, and ASP statute and regulations are complex and full of gaps and ambiguities. We are closely following the SuperValu cert.
The 340B program, authorized under Section 340B of the Public Health Services Act and administered by HRSA, imposes a ceiling price on pharmaceutical manufacturer sales to “covered entities,” which are certain health clinics that receive federal funding and certain types of safety net hospitals to provide them drugs at lower prices.
.” But, the court looked also to the long-felt unmet need before negating patentability: During a period of half a century, in which the use of flash light batteries increased enormously, and the manufacturers of flash light cells were conscious of the defects in them, no one devised a method of curing such defects. ” A.
According to the facts, the brothers Balkrishna and Nagaraj Setty signed an agreement for partnership where they became the joint owner of the incense manufacturing company. Later, the brothers started their own competing manufacturing companies in separate Indian Cities i.e., Bangalore and Mumbai.
” The Lower CourtDecision In 1842, Wood sued William Underhill and Aschel Gerow for infringement. ” The circuit court agreed with the defendants and instructed the jury that the specification was too vague and uncertain to support the patent. .”
The collaborative idea was that Eddings would manufacture the sheaths because Junker did not have that capability. Thus, the court has held that an offer-to-manufacture doesn’t count. In reviewing the letter, the court noted that the terms appeared quite complete.
The 2017 Supreme Courtdecision in TC Heartland gave renewed teeth to the venue statute governing litigation. Celgene Corp. Mylan Pharma ( Fed. There are two different ways to show proper venue: Venue by Residence : Venue is proper if the defendant(s) reside in the district where the case is filed.
Historically, voting on executive compensation packages has been a pro forma exercise at the annual meetings of technology manufacturer 3M Co., A January courtdecision necessitated a new vote on Musk’s compensation, which has left Tesla insiders lobbying major investors and proxy advisers to give the plan a thumbs up.
The statute isclear that patents should be awarded to “any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof” so long as the other requirements of patentability are met. One difficulty with the law here is that it is entirely judge made. SG Brief.
Eligibility under Section 101 : American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. 20-1394 (CVSG requested October 4, 2021); Undermining Jury Decisions : Olaf Sööt Design, LLC v. The asserted patent covers a new method of manufacturing an automobile drive-shaft with reduced vibration. Neapco Holdings LLC, et al. , Patreon, Inc.,
The decision has wide-ranging implications for FDA’s assertion of discretion in classifying and regulating medical products. As most readers of our blog are aware, the regulatory costs to manufacturers of medical products are much lower if FDA regulates a product as a medical device rather than a drug requiring FDA marketing approval.
Within two days of the final rule, the Window Covering Manufacturers Association filed suit at the D.C. This decision from three Democrat-appointed judges can be seen as a traditional pullback of a procedurally deficient agency rule. But there may be more for us to learn from this decision. See 15 U.S.C.
A regulatory consultant on the panel made a recommendation to FDA that it lean more heavily on Remote Interactive Evaluations (“REIs”) to help alleviate its backlog—of which HPM recently learned the Agency had only conducted 10 in the last 30 months for purposes of drug manufacturing compliance.
In this case, the agency must set reimbursement rates using each drug’s “average price” charged by the manufacturers for the drug, as “calculated and adjusted by the Secretary as necessary for purposes of” this statutory provision. Option 2 applies only if HHS has not conducted such a survey. citing §1395 l (t)(14)(A)(iii)(II)).
Important to note here is that each interchangeable biosimilar was first approved as a biosimilar and each biosimilar manufacturer had been sued under the so-called “patent dance” procedure prior to seeking licensure of the biosimilar products as interchangeable.
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the courtsdecision, complaining that it had agreed to rewrite statutory text. Justice Samuel Alito wrote his own dissent in which he contended that his colleagues had resolved the dispute based on an issue that the lower court had not reached and the parties had not really addressed.
Last week, the Court ruled on a pair of combined cases that potentially impacts many of our blog readers in the pharmaceutical, device, and biologics space that benefit from reimbursements from Federal health care programs. The Supreme CourtDecision The unanimous Supreme Court was having none of it.
If a patent claims an entire class of processes, machines, manufactures, or compositions of matter, the patent’s specification must enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the entire class. Guidelines for Assessing Enablement in Utility Applications and Patents in View of the Supreme CourtDecision in Amgen Inc.
Teva has traditionally been a generic manufacturer, but in this case sued Eli Lilly for infringing its patents covering methods of treating headache disorders like migraine using humanized antibodies that bind to and antagonize calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a protein associated with migraine pain. Lilly for a few years.
In that situation, the patent applicant might maintain the compound claims in the original application and then file a “divisional application” to protect the methods of manufacture. ” Based upon the peculiar facts of this case, MSN argued that neither of these requirements had been met.
But the gun owners and gun manufacturers challenging the rule counter that the federal government has not previously required a license to build a gun for private use. Manufacturers must also put a serial number on guns. They were later joined by several manufacturers and another advocacy group.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district courtdecision that vacated the listing of the Beringia distinct population segment (DPS) of the Pacific bearded seal subspecies as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Climate Litigation Chart (Update #92): FEATURED CASE. Alaska Oil & Gas Association v.
This tit-for-tat directive against Texas SB8 is the latest of the bold moves Newsom has taken and responds directly to the Supreme Courtdecision last week. Newsom has been a roll since convincingly surviving a recall effort against him in September.
The decision also vacated an injunction from the Northern District of New York and a prior Second Circuit ruling on an Eastern District of New York case. While the two lower courtdecisions originate from different jurisdictions, both pertain to healthcare workers’ concerns over the COVID-19 vaccine.
Some older Supreme Courtdecisions support that theory of consent. Some courts read [Supreme Court precedent] as effectively foreclosing [this consent-by-registration theory of jurisdiction], while others insist it remains viable.”. In Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v.
A federal district court in Arizona rejected the group’s request to stop the land exchange, and the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit affirmed that ruling. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. McClain 24-118 Issue : Whether the U.S.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content