This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
“Courts Strike Down Gun Control Measures in Two States; The rulings in Maryland and Oregon come amid a shifting legal landscape in the wake of a Supreme Courtdecision that has imposed new limits on gun regulation”: David W. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit at this link. ” And Bryan P.
The state trial court rejected that motion, and he was convicted. In his dissent from the denial of review, Thomas castigated the 6th Circuit for failing to give the state appeals courtsdecision the kind of substantial deference it deserved under the federal law governing state prisoners requests for post-conviction relief.
The justices once again did not act on several high-profile petitions for review, including a challenge to Marylands ban on military assault-style weapons and Rhode Islands ban on large-capacity magazines. The announcement that the court had granted review in Barrett v.
The 2017 Supreme Courtdecision in TC Heartland gave renewed teeth to the venue statute governing litigation. The FDA is headquartered in Maryland, and that was the office that received the ANDA documents. and probably also in Maryland, but not in N.J. Celgene Corp. Mylan Pharma ( Fed.
Kirschenbaum — In November 2020, we blogged about a decision by the Federal District Court of Maryland dismissing a Federal False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam suit alleging that Forest Laboratories knowingly reported inflated best prices under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP), resulting in underpayment of rebates.
In her view, before a court invalidates the lower court’sdecision on fairness grounds, the party seeking to have the decision invalidated ‘must explain what harm — other than having to accept the law as the lower court stated it — flows from the inability to appeal the lower courtdecision.”
Based on a 1963 Supreme Courtdecision, Brady vs. Maryland , prosecutors have a constitutional duty to give defense attorneys evidence that could cast doubt on a defendant’s guilt or reduce a potential sentence, including information that could diminish the credibility of prosecution witnesses.
In April 2022, Vanda Pharmaceuticals filed a complaint in the Maryland Federal District Court to challenge CMS’ definition on Administrative Procedure Act (APA) grounds. We previously blogged on the district court’sdecision last year. Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. MJM-22-977 (Dist.
Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Sineneng-Smith , the justices reversed a circuit-courtdecision that struck down a federal law criminalizing the act of “encourag[ing] or induc[ing]” noncitizens to enter or remain in the United States for financial gain.
Six states have enacted contract pharmacy protections into law: Kansas , Maryland , Mississippi , and West Virginia in 2024, Louisiana in 2023, and Arkansas in 2021. Courtdecision, may be rendered inconsequential. Bills are pending in other states, including Missouri and New York.
What they are really doing is trying to avoid the need to reveal the identity of their contributors, following a US District Courtdecision in March. This is is the provision that led to the US District Courtdecision at issue. " Maryland Rep. " As explained below, these claims are incorrect.
Koblitz — You know a courtdecision is going to be worth reading when the judges compare FDA’s regulatory governance of flavored e-cigarettes to a Shakespearean gaslighting. FDA originally set the PMTA deadline as August 8, 2022, but a district court in Maryland ordered FDA to shorten it. By David B.
In total, at least 25 cases have been filed in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai’i, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Vermont. The Supreme Court sided with the fossil fuel company defendants, ruling that appellate courts could review all grounds of the remand order.
(Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images) In early June 2022, in the wake of the unprecedented leak of a draft of the Supreme Courts Dobbs opinion, Nicholas Roske, a California man in his mid-20s, was arrested near Justice Brett Kavanaughs Maryland home. Roske, who was reportedly angry about the Courtsdecision to overturn Roe v.
The case was currently pending before the Fourth Circuit after a federal district court in Maryland held that Maryland law preempted the local law. The court rejected DLNR’s argument that a 2017 Hawaii Supreme Courtdecision requiring environmental review for aquarium fishing only applied to fishing with fine-meshed nets.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district courtdecision that vacated the listing of the Beringia distinct population segment (DPS) of the Pacific bearded seal subspecies as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Climate Litigation Chart (Update #92): FEATURED CASE. Alaska Oil & Gas Association v.
It notes the acknowledged circuit split, argues that loss and miscarriage are sufficiently broad to encompass claims of intentional nondelivery, and argues that langauge in the Supreme Courtsdecision in Dolan v. USPS indicates that immunity covers situations when mail fails to arrive at all. Relisted after the Jan.
The 1991 Supreme Court ruling in Payne v. Subsequent courtdecisions have muddied the legal waters on VIS. Tennessee upheld the admission of VIS in capital trials, but “this tension has not been adequately addressed,” Bandes writes. In Booth v.
The Second Circuit also distinguished the Connecticut program from a Maryland regulatory scheme that the U.S. Supreme Court determined was preempted in Hughes v. Austria’s Constitutional Court Reversed Lower CourtDecision That Held Up Airport Expansion Based on Climate Change Concerns. ADDITION TO THE NON-U.S.
As is frequently the case when the court denies review in cases that have been relisted repeatedly, denial occasioned dissent, this time from Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch. Relisted after the Jan. 28 and Mar. 7 conferences.) Relisted after the Jan. 28 and Mar. 7 conferences.)
In 1993, William Neilly was sentenced in Michigan state court to life without the possibility of parole for a homicide he committed as a juvenile. Because of intervening Supreme Courtdecisions prohibiting the imposition of no-parole life sentences for juvenile offenders, he was resentenced to a lesser sentence. 21 and Feb.
It’s a little surprising the court let stand a federal courtdecision invalidating a state statute on constitutional grounds, but animal-rights groups defending that decision argued persuasively that state statutes are in a state of flux and it would be premature for the justices to take up the case now.
By allowing judges to ignore such considerations when sentencing a young person to die behind bars, the recent Supreme Courtdecision promises to further inequity. Even the victim’s wife agreed, underscoring that Jones, like other youth, is indeed redeemable and can work towards atoning for his heinous acts.
Ask any constitutional law student to name the most iconic Supreme Courtdecision, and they’ll probably answer Marbury v. Those two landmark rulings stand as the most celebrated decisions the court has ever issued. Maryland : “[W]e must never forget that it is a constitution we are expounding.” Board of Education.
” Similarly, the report pointed to several courtdecisions that support the usage of the sort of surveillance programs used by the BPD. But while the courts upheld many cases involving police surveillance, the instances were specific. ” The report also noted a 2008 report commissioned by then-Gov.
Several of them are sequels to earlier high courtdecisions. First Amendment The current court is very solicitous of First Amendment rights. Maryland and Napue v. Below we briefly discuss those 14 cases. So perhaps unsurprisingly, many of the relisted petitions – six of them – implicate the First Amendment.
Glossip counters that there is a “high hurdle” to overcome the presumption that the Supreme Court can review a state court ruling on an issue of federal law. And in this case, he stresses, the state court’sdecision “relied directly” on federal law – specifically, the Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Brady v.
Maryland and Napue v. The questions before the justices include: “(1) Whether the state’s suppression of the key prosecution witness’ admission that he was under the care of a psychiatrist and failure to correct that witness’ false testimony about that care and related diagnosis violate the due process of law under Brady v.
Under my proposal, the mall and core federal buildings would remain the District of Columbia (as is the case in this legislation) but the remainder of the District would retrocede back to Maryland (as did the other half of the original District to Virginia). Absent retrocession, there remains only statehood. It is a recurring problem.
But in July, Laufer asked the justices to throw out the case, and invalidate the 1st Circuit’s decision in her favor. Jackson later asked why, if the issue is going to arise again, the court shouldn’t just “wait until it comes up again.”
Best Price Stacking We previously blogged about the 4 th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in United States Ex Rel. Allergan Sales , which affirmed a lower courtdecision in a Federal False Claims case involving best price stacking. Sheldon, v.
The court of appeals, it explained, rejected Andrews claim because, it thought, no holding of this Court established a general rule that the erroneous admission of prejudicial evidence could violate due process. That was wrong, the court concluded.
Public officials in Maine, Maryland, Michigan and California have already proposed or passed measures to curb what they say is a rise in targeted harassment related to demonstrations against public vaccination efforts and pandemic rules, reports the Wall Street Journal. limiting hours for protests aimed at a particular home.
Yet, there is virtually no mention of Jackson’s position on an advisory board for the now-defunct Montrose Christian School in Rockville, Maryland. Her trial courtdecisions shed little light on that question, and she previously refused to discuss her philosophy.
Share The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a challenge to Marylands handgun licensing regime, as well as a pair of cases seeking to hold oil and gas companies responsible for damage caused by climate change. The justices denied review in Maryland Shall Issue v. The court will consider the petition in Snope v.
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, by a 2-1 vote, held that conclusion was not unreasonable. Whatley argues that the Georgia Supreme Court unreasonably applied federal law when, in considering whether he was prejudiced, it failed to give weight to Supreme Courtdecisions holding that shackling is inherently prejudicial.
While the Supreme Court routinely throws out lower-courtdecisions granting prisoners habeas relief, its fairly uncommon for the justices to summarily grant relief to habeas petitioners. Lewis , 24-473 Issue : Whether Maryland v. Relisted after the Jan. 10 and Jan. 17 conferences.) Relisted after the Jan. 10 and Jan.
The state of Arizona now seeks review at the Supreme Court. Because the Supreme Court has in recent months summarily overturned appellate courtdecisions twice in habeas cases (including one other case from the 9th Circuit), this petition is doubtless getting the court’s careful attention. Maryland , 20-101.
In its petition, Great Lakes claims that choice of law under federal admiralty has been utter chaos since a 1955 Supreme Courtdecision , made tolerable only by strict enforcement of choice-of-law clauses. It argues that the 3rd Circuit’s decision has thrown all of that into upheaval and must be reviewed. record requested Oct.
A Supreme Courtdecision Thursday upending a century-old New York State gun licensing restriction has been called a major blow to state gun control interventions across the country. The Court released its opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association (NYSRPA) v.
Minnesota Supreme Court Declined to Review Claims Regarding Environmental Review for Oil Pipeline. The Minnesota Supreme Court denied petitions for further review of an appellate courtdecision finding all but one aspect of the environmental review for the Enbridge Line 3 oil pipeline project to be adequate.
The constitutionality of assault-weapons bans On Monday, the justices turned down a challenge to Marylands gun-licensing requirement. In 2020, a group of Maryland residents, gun-rights groups, and a firearms dealer sued to challenge the ban. A federal district court rejected this challenge, and the U.S. In Snope v.
His 2022 report , in the aftermath of the courtsdecision overturning the constitutional right to abortion, stressed the importance of judicial security. A California man, Nicholas Roske, is scheduled to stand trial in Maryland next year on charges that he attempted to assassinate Justice Brett Kavanaugh in 2022.
Justice Sotomayor dissented, writing that she believed the Court’s interpretation would allow defendants to “sidestep” the general bar on appellate review by “shoehorning” a civil rights or federal officer removal argument into their case for removal. District Court Stayed Briefing of Motion to Remand in Annapolis’s Climate Case.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
100 
Let's personalize your content