This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In District of Columbia v Heller (Heller), the Supreme Court held both the Second and Fourteenth Amendments enshrine the “right to possess a handgun at home for self-defense.” ” The court then explained that in NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Assn, Inc.
Last week, building electrification secured an important victory in the United States District Court for the Southern District of NewYork. In Association of Contracting Plumbers of The City of NewYork, Inc. Judge Abrams Decision in Association of Contracting Plumbers of The City of NewYork, Inc.
WEINSTEIN AND THE NEWYORKCOURT OF APPEALSby Sarah Midani (Albany Law School, Class of 2025; Editor-in-Chief, Albany LawReview)As Ms. Midani writes, the NewYork high court'sdecision to overturn Harvey Weinstein's conviction garnered mixed reactions from advocates against sexual violence, including those behind the #MeToo
“NewYork enacts new gun restrictions in response to supreme courtdecision; After court overturned 1911 NewYork law, state lawmakers produced act to create ‘gun-free zones’ and strengthen gun control measures”: Martin Pengelly of The Guardian (UK) has this report.
“NewYork’s Gun Laws Sow Confusion as Nation Rethinks Regulation; A Supreme Courtdecision overturning century-old NewYork gun regulations has produced scores of new lawsuits as jurists and citizens sort out what’s legal”: Jonah E.
The Supreme Court ruling striking down NewYork State’s laws requiring permits for carrying a weapon will have a long-term effect on state gun laws, but in the interim it can be used by states to establish tougher gun restrictions, according to a new analysis from RAND Corporation.
“The Legal Merits of the Colorado Supreme CourtDecision Don’t Matter”: Eric Levitz has this post at the “Intelligencer” blog of NewYork magazine. The post “The Legal Merits of the Colorado Supreme CourtDecision Don’t Matter” appeared first on How Appealing.
“Supreme Court Returns to a Culture War Battleground: Transgender Rights; On Wednesday, the justices will hear the marquee case of the term, a challenge to a Tennessee law banning several forms of medical care for transgender youths.” ” Adam Liptak of The NewYork Times has this report. Casey Parks and Ann E.
Heres the Thursday morning read: Ex-Congressman’s Meme Fight Faces Long Odds at Supreme Court (Kyle Jahner, Bloomberg Law News) Supreme Court Fast-Tracks TikTok Case in Face of Jan. 19 appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
“Supreme Court Signals That Landmark Libel Ruling Is Secure; Attacked by two justices, lower-court judges and litigants, the 1964 ruling in NewYork Times v.
In Seven County, backers of a proposed train linking Utah oilfields to refineries on the Gulf Coast ask the justices to overturn a lower courtdecision blocking the project and narrow the scope of what environmental impacts the 1970 National Environmental Policy Act requires agencies to review. Follow along for our live coverage.
“A String of Supreme CourtDecisions Hits Hard at Environmental Rules; Four cases backed by conservative activists in recent years have combined to diminish the power of the Environmental Protection Agency”: Coral Davenport of The NewYork Times has this report.
“Mexico’s Top Court Dismisses Proposal to Invalidate Contentious Judicial Overhaul; The move spares the country’s new president from having to choose between recognizing a courtdecision to strike down the overhaul or aligning with her party’s leaders and ignoring it”: Emiliano Rodríguez Mega and Simon Romero of The NewYork Times have (..)
Curbs Wetlands Protection; The agency curtailed pollution protections for millions of streams, wetlands and other bodies of water to comply with a Supreme Courtdecision”: Lisa Friedman and Coral Davenport of The NewYork Times have this report. The post “After Supreme Court Forces Its Hand, E.P.A.
How the landmark 1978 Supreme Courtdecision that upheld the practice may ultimately have set it on a path to being outlawed.” ” Emily Bazelon will have this article in this upcoming Sunday’s issue of The NewYork Times Magazine. One Man’s Decision.
“How It Feels to Have Your Life Changed By Affirmative Action; Black and Hispanic college graduates, whose lives were directly shaped by race-conscious college admissions, have complicated thoughts about the expected Supreme Courtdecision”: Amy Harmon has this front page article in today’s edition of The NewYork Times.
“In the Gun Law Fights of 2023, a Need for Experts on the Weapons of 1791; A Supreme Courtdecision has forced courts to consider what gun restrictions existed two centuries ago, sending demand soaring for historians”: Shawn Hubler of The NewYork Times has this report.
“The Cosby Ruling: Some Legal Analysts Dispute the Court’s Reasoning; The courtdecision that reversed the sexual assault conviction of Bill Cosby has prompted an unusual level of legal debate about the appropriate parameters of appellate review.”
The Supreme Courtdecision over Andy Warhol’s use of Lynn Goldsmith’s Prince photograph was decided on the narrow grounds of a licensing issue. ” Blake Gopnik of The NewYork Times has this news analysis. “Ruling Against Warhol Shouldn’t Hurt Artists. But It Might. But It Might.
“A Year After Dobbs, Advocates Push in the States for a Right to Birth Control; After Justice Clarence Thomas cast doubt on the Supreme Courtdecision that established a right to contraception, reproductive rights advocates are pressing for new protections at the state level”: Sheryl Gay Stolberg of The NewYork Times has this report.
In two unsigned decisions without noted dissents, the Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of police officers accused of using excessive force, signaling the court’s continued support of the doctrine of qualified immunity, reports the NewYork Times.
His legacy is tied to a Supreme Courtdecision that upheld the ‘separate but equal’ doctrine, underpinning laws that segregated and disenfranchised African Americans for decades.” ” Rick Rojas of The NewYork Times has this report. Now He May Get Justice.
.” Earlier this month, the US District Court for the Central District of California issued a preliminary injunction blocking SB 2 from taking effect in 2024. The judge based his ruling on the two-part test from the US Supreme Courtdecision last year in NewYork State Rifle and Pistol Association v.
“Courts Strike Down Gun Control Measures in Two States; The rulings in Maryland and Oregon come amid a shifting legal landscape in the wake of a Supreme Courtdecision that has imposed new limits on gun regulation”: David W. Chen of The NewYork Times has this report.
Jerking Off To A Supreme CourtDecision? Explosive New Sexual Assault Case: Against a former NewYork Judge. And a random one at that. More Raises: For Blank Rome, Duane Morris, and Eversheds. Have A Great Time While You Can, Summer Associates: Because it won't last.
The judge based his ruling on the two-part test from the US Supreme Courtdecision last year in NewYork State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Carney found that the California law violates the Second Amendment of the US Constitution.
Courts in other states had rejected that argument (see our articles on decisions in NewYork , Florida and Georgia ), but the question of the status of the law remained unresolved in California.
Ho said that with Eric Adamss lawyer and federal prosecutors agreeing to end the case, he needed to hear independent arguments”: Benjamin Weiser of The NewYork Times has this report. solicitor general, will examine the Justice Departments decision to dismiss the bribery case against the NewYork mayor.”
.” Last month, the US District Court for the Central District of California issued a preliminary injunction blocking SB 2 from taking effect in 2024. The judge based his ruling on the two-part test from the US Supreme Courtdecision last year in NewYork State Rifle and Pistol Association v.
This securities class action relies on the “fraud-on-the-market” theory, which was validated in the 1988 Supreme Courtdecision, Basic Inc. They allege the bank overstated its ability to manage conflicts of interest.
US District Judge Roger Benitez based his decision on the US Supreme Court’s holding in NewYork State Rifle and Pistol Association v. California Attorney General Rob Bonta responded to the decision 0n X (formerly Twitter) on Wednesday.
Anemona Hartocollis of The NewYork Times reports that “ Harvard’s Black Student Enrollment Dips After Affirmative Action Ends; Defying expectations, a Supreme Courtdecision curtailing race-based admissions still had a relatively small impact at some highly selective schools like Harvard, even as other schools saw big changes.”
Arizona prisoner asks Supreme Court to delay his execution (Jacques Billeaud, Associated Press). How states are preparing for a Supreme Courtdecision that could overturn Roe v. Wade (Judy Woodruff, PBS News Hour). NewYork Officials Fear Supreme Court Ruling Will Mean More Gun Crime (Jonah E.
the Supreme Court of NewYork (NewYork’scourt of first instance) denied enforcement of a Chinese court judgment on the ground that the judgment “was rendered under a system which does not provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with the requirements of due process of law.”
Amid an increase in bias incidents motivated by the Israel-Hamas, places of worship in NewYork must now choose whether to let congregants carry firearms while attending services, Jennifer Mascia reports for The Trace.
In recent weeks, decisions of a US District Court judge in the Southern District of NewYork led to the suspension of service by the Internet streaming company Locast, which built its business on streaming local television stations generally without obtaining the consent of TV stations or the copyright holders in the programs they broadcast.
The Supreme Court Had No Legal Reason to Block Biden’s Workplace Vaccine Rules (Mark Joseph Stern, Slate). A Split Supreme CourtDecision on Vaccine Mandates (Editorial, The Wall Street Journal). The Supreme Court Goes Anti-Vaxx (Irin Carmon, NewYork magazine). The post The morning read for Friday, Jan.
Last January, the Supreme Court refused to disturb an order by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit that temporarily allowed NewYork to enforce a new concealed-carry law while multiple challenges to the law proceed. But the court did not specify exactly what history courts must look to.
Here’s the Friday morning read: The Supreme Court Overturns Fifty Years of Precedent on Affirmative Action (Jeannie Suk Gersen, The New Yorker) The Mysterious Case of the Fake Gay Marriage Website, the Real Straight Man, and the Supreme Court (Melissa Gira Grant, The New Republic) With Supreme CourtDecision, College Admissions Could Become More Subjective (..)
Here’s the Friday morning read: Supreme Court Rules on Stolen Art, Signs and Puerto Rico’s Status (Adam Liptak, The NewYork Times). Supreme Court considers whether high school football coach has right to pray on the field (Mark Walsh, ABA Journal).
Is the Supreme Court ready to upend the power of state courts in disputes over federal elections? Linda Greenhouse, The NewYork Times). This US Supreme Courtdecision could derail Biden’s climate plan (Jeff Tollefson, Nature). Ariane de Vogue, CNN).
A year-long study of young people living in at-risk neighborhoods in NewYork City found that fears for personal safety, and fears of police, were the primary motivations for carrying a firearm. The recent study by the Center for Court Innovation surveyed 330 youth aged 16-24, a majority of them men of color.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content