Broadcast Law Blog

APRIL 25, 2013

This week, the Chairman of the US House of Representatives Judiciary Committee issued a press release stating that he intends that the Committee do a thorough reexamination of the Copyright Act , noting that new technologies stemming from digital media have upset many settled expectations in Copyright Law, and confused many issues.

Court Decisions 40

Court Decisions Court Statute Technology 40

Broadcast Law Blog

FEBRUARY 20, 2014

Aereo finally lost a court decision. See our summary of the NY decision here ). The Utah Court issued an injunction preventing Aereo from operating in Utah until the issue is decided by the Supreme Court. . Does this Utah decision serve as a preview of the upcoming Supreme Court decision?

Court Decisions 44

Court Decisions Court Laws Statute 44

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 16, 2024

Both cases are now before the Supreme Court. Because of the wrinkles of the court’s jurisdictional statutes, Garcia comes from the three-judge district court directly to the Supreme Court as an appeal over which the court has mandatory jurisdiction. Palmer would ordinarily go through the U.S. 12 and Jan.

Court 100

Court Laws Statute Court Decisions 100

At the Lectern

NOVEMBER 2, 2021

The New York Times’s Thomas Fuller has also written about the possibility of renaming the law school because of this infamous chapter of Hastings’s past — “ He Unleashed a California Massacre. both honor a deserving California Native American and maintain a connection to the California Supreme Court.

Laws 56

Laws Law School Education Statute 56

Broadcast Law Blog

AUGUST 21, 2009

The statute defines an interactive service as one where a user can select a specific song or “receive a transmission of a program specially created for the recipient.” This was important in the Court’s analysis. The issue in the case turned on an analysis of the DMCA’s definition of an interactive service.

Court 56

Court Statute Court Decisions Technology 56

Conflict of Laws

MAY 17, 2023

There are state courts and federal courts, state statutes and federal statutes, state common law and federal common law. This feeling of pity is compounded when I imagine this same lawyer trying to advise her client as to whether a choice-of-court clause will be enforced by a court in the United States.

Court 52

Court Statute Lawyers Lawyer 52

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 3, 2025

Devas then filed suit in federal court in the United States seeking to confirm the arbitration award. They relied on the New York Convention (a treaty to which the United States is a party, which calls for the enforcement of these sorts of arbitration awards). Although the district court agreed to confirm the award, the U.S.

Court 71

Court Contract Court Rules Government 71

Constitutional Law Reporter

AUGUST 13, 2024

According to the Court, when an individual has been found by a court to pose a credible threat to the physical safety of another, that individual may be temporarily disarmed consistent with the Second Amendment. The District Court denied Rahimi’s motion to dismiss the indictment on Second Amendment grounds. Bruen , 597 U.S.

Laws 52

Laws Court Constitutional Law Statute 52

Broadcast Law Blog

OCTOBER 27, 2017

This case reached the Florida Supreme Court when it was certified by the United State Court of Appeals which was reviewing a District Court decision reaching the same conclusion as did the Florida Supreme Court – that there was no performance right under state law for pre-1972 sound recordings (see our summary of the District Court decision here ).

Court 40

Court Court Decisions Statute Laws 40

Conflict of Laws

JANUARY 11, 2024

After the painting was looted, it found its way into the United States and, in 1976, Baron Hans Heinrich Thyssen-Bornemisza bought it from the Hahn Gallery of New York, where the painting was publicly in display, allegedly ignoring its origin. The Museum Thyssen-Bornemisza purchased the painting from the Baron in 1993.

Statute 45

Statute Laws Court Court Rules 45

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 6, 2017

Circuit also rejected EPA’s argument that the court did not have authority to review stays issued under Section 307(d)(7)(D) of the Clean Air Act. Allco is an owner, operator, and developer of solar energy projects throughout the country, including in Georgia and New York. Allco Finance Ltd. Klee , Nos. June 28, 2017).

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Attorney 40

Broadcast Law Blog

FEBRUARY 8, 2015

Musical composition rates are currently set by US District Court judges in the Southern District of New York. Those requirements are set by statute, and thus effectively cannot be amended, changed or waived by SoundExchange or the CRB.

Laws 53

Laws Depositions Court Statute 53

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 11, 2020

A Hawaii court held that the Hawai‘i Environmental Policy Act requires environmental review for commercial taking of aquarium fish and that Department of Land and Natural Resources issuance and renewal of licenses for commercial aquarium collection without environmental review was invalid and illegal. New York v. New York v.

Court 59

Court Government Litigation Litigating 59

Conflict of Laws

NOVEMBER 17, 2021

Therefore, the discrepancy between pre-decision opinion and final award does not amount to annulment of the award. [xv]. The abovementioned court decisions are somehow problematic: the pre-decision notification is by no means a mere investigating tool for the tribunal.

Legal 40

Legal Legal Court Laws 40

JURIST

FEBRUARY 7, 2024

A three-judge panel from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Monday overruled a lower court decision that blocked a California law requiring individuals seeking to buy ammunition to undergo a background check, allowing the state to mandate background checks for ammunition buyers.

Laws 211

Laws Court Statute Attorney 211

Constitutional Law Reporter

APRIL 29, 2025

Supreme Court held that the knowing or intentional causation of injury or death, whether by act or omission, necessarily involves the use of physical force against another person within the meaning of18 U.S.C. Facts of the Case The federal statute at issue, Title 18 U.S.C. In support of its decision, the Court cited United States v.

Statute 52

Statute Court Decisions Misdemeanor Court 52

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 5, 2023

Several of them are sequels to earlier high court decisions. First Amendment The current court is very solicitous of First Amendment rights. The Farm Bureau and North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein ask the court to grant review and reverse the 4th Circuit’s decision. New York and 335-7 LLC v.

Tort 117

Tort Court Litigating Litigation 117

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 6, 2025

In 1993, William Neilly was sentenced in Michigan state court to life without the possibility of parole for a homicide he committed as a juvenile. Because of intervening Supreme Court decisions prohibiting the imposition of no-parole life sentences for juvenile offenders, he was resentenced to a lesser sentence. 21 and Feb.

Court 96

Court Attorney Laws Government 96

The Crime Report

JUNE 23, 2022

Report authors highlighted a recent Supreme Court decision in Canada. This month in a landmark decision in R v Bissonnette , the Canadian Supreme unanimously ruled life without parole sentences unconstitutional on the basis that sentences that extend beyond a person’s natural ability to outlive them are cruel and unusual punishments.

Statute 142

Statute Court Decisions Court 142

At the Lectern

MAY 5, 2022

The station quoted a court clerk as saying only that a “momentous court decision” would be announced the next day. A book-length discussion of the Tanner episode is Stolz, “Judging Judges: The Investigation of Rose Bird and the California Supreme Court.”). Tanner (1978) 151 Cal.Rptr.

Court 56

Court Drafting Statute Court Decisions 56

Conflict of Laws

JANUARY 24, 2022

Jean Mohamed: Die aktienrechtliche actio pro socio im globalen Kontext – Zur Abgrenzung von materiellem Recht und Verfahrensrecht im anglo-amerikanischen Rechtskreis am Beispiel der derivative action in New York. claims of the corporation asserted in the shareholder’s own name – may be imminent. Paul Achleitner et al.,

Litigating 52

Litigating Litigation Laws Court 52

Conflict of Laws

APRIL 20, 2022

Implementing the Hague Judgments Convention”, New York University Law Review 97 (2022), forthcoming (Draft available here ). The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the New York Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, Cardoso, Connor J. Coco, Sarah E.

Drafting 52

Drafting Laws Litigating Litigation 52

Conflict of Laws

JANUARY 11, 2022

“The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the New York Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, The Value of a New Judgments Convention for U.S. Litigants”, New York University Law Review 94 (2019), pp 1210-1243. Coco, Sarah E. Cong, Junqi. Kasem, Rouzana.

Drafting 52

Drafting Laws Litigating Litigation 52

Conflict of Laws

NOVEMBER 23, 2021

“The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the New York Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, The Value of a New Judgments Convention for U.S. Litigants”, New York University Law Review 94 (2019), pp 1210-1243. Coco, Sarah E. Cong, Junqi. Kasem, Rouzana.

Drafting 52

Drafting Laws Litigating Litigation 52

Conflict of Laws

FEBRUARY 16, 2022

“The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the New York Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, The Value of a New Judgments Convention for U.S. Litigants”, New York University Law Review 94 (2019), pp 1210-1243. Coco, Sarah E. Cong, Junqi. Kasem, Rouzana.

Drafting 52

Drafting Laws Litigating Litigation 52

Conflict of Laws

DECEMBER 7, 2021

“The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the New York Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, The Value of a New Judgments Convention for U.S. Litigants”, New York University Law Review 94 (2019), pp 1210-1243. Coco, Sarah E. Cong, Junqi. Kasem, Rouzana.

Drafting 52

Drafting Laws Litigating Litigation 52

Conflict of Laws

AUGUST 31, 2022

Implementing the Hague Judgments Convention”, New York University Law Review 97 (2022), forthcoming (Draft available here ). The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the New York Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, Cardoso, Connor J. Coco, Sarah E.

Drafting 40

Drafting Laws Litigating Litigation 40

Conflict of Laws

JUNE 21, 2022

Implementing the Hague Judgments Convention”, New York University Law Review 97 (2022), forthcoming (Draft available here ). The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the New York Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, Cardoso, Connor J. Coco, Sarah E.

Drafting 40

Drafting Laws Litigating Litigation 40

Conflict of Laws

SEPTEMBER 28, 2022

Implementing the Hague Judgments Convention”, New York University Law Review 97 (2022), forthcoming (Draft available here ). The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the New York Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, Cardoso, Connor J. Coco, Sarah E.

Drafting 40

Drafting Laws Litigating Litigation 40

JURIST

FEBRUARY 28, 2023

The case arose over a 2019 New York law that prohibits an employer from “discriminat[ing] nor tak[ing] any retaliatory personnel action against an employee with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because of or on the basis of the employee’s or dependent’s reproductive health decision making.”

Statute 267

Statute Court Court Decisions Government 267

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 6, 2024

This week, we highlight petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether allowing key prosecution witnesses to testify remotely over a two-way video call violates the confrontation clause. John Won and Tae Hung Kang are New York residents charged with operating an international investment scam.

Government 79

Government Statute Court Court Decisions 79

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 13, 2025

Instead, the 5th Circuit applied a less rigorous standard of review, known as rational basis review, which looks at whether the statute furthers a legitimate state interest, and whether there is a rational connection between that interest and the law. The court of appeals relied on the Supreme Courts 1968 decision in Ginsberg v.

Court 112

Court Entertainment Technology Government 112

Conflict of Laws

AUGUST 30, 2023

847-880 (available here ) Brannigan, Neil “Resolving conflicts: establishing forum non conveniens in a new Hague jurisdiction convention”, Journal of Private International Law 18 (2022), pp. Implementing the Hague Judgments Convention”, New York University Law Review 97 (2022), pp. 187-214 Coco, Sarah E. 8 (2021), pp.

Drafting 98

Drafting Laws Litigating Litigation 98

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 13, 2024

Coverage of federal fraud statutes Porat v. There are six newly relisted cases this week, so I’m going to be more summary than usual in describing them. This week’s relists are a real grab bag of issues. United States and Kousisis v. 26 and May 9 conferences; relisted after the May 16, May 23 and May 30 conferences) Jane Doe 1 v.

Government 114

Government Court Laws Litigating 114

HowAppealing

DECEMBER 10, 2021

“Supreme Court Allows Challenge to Texas Abortion Law but Leaves It in Effect; The law, which bans most abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy, was drafted to evade review in federal court and has been in effect since September”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. ” David G. .”

Drafting 100

Drafting Laws Court Court Rules 100

JURIST

JANUARY 31, 2025

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled Thursday that a federal statute requiring people to be 21 to purchase handguns from Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) conflicts with previous Supreme Court decisions and the Second Amendment.

Statute 208

Statute Laws Court Court Decisions 208

Conflict of Laws

APRIL 4, 2023

847-880 (available here ) Brannigan, Neil “Resolving conflicts: establishing forum non conveniens in a new Hague jurisdiction convention”, Journal of Private International Law 18 (2022), pp. Implementing the Hague Judgments Convention”, New York University Law Review 97 (2022), pp. 187-214 Coco, Sarah E. 8 (2021), pp.

Drafting 52

Drafting Laws Litigating Litigation 52