This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A newly revised NorthCarolina juvenile justice law will take effect Sunday, aiming to address gaps in handling serious offenses by minors. The right for 16- and 17-year-olds to have a parent, guardian, custodian, or caretaker present during a custodial interrogation in NorthCarolina remains intact.
Harper after the latest NorthCarolina Supreme Courtdecision in the partisan gerrymandering case?” Harper after the latest NorthCarolina Supreme Courtdecision in the partisan gerrymandering case?” “What happens to Moore v. ” The post “What happens to Moore v.
A three-judge panel of the NorthCarolinaCourt of Appeals published a pair of opinions Tuesday holding that two people can be charged with murder for brutalizing a child 25 years ago — even though they had already been convicted of child abuse for the same act of violence in the late ‘90s. David Tripp, Jr.
Share At oral arguments earlier this week the Supreme Court was skeptical of the Food and Drug Administrations effort to block a NorthCarolina-based company from challenging the denial of its application to market e-cigarettes in the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in Louisiana.
Share The Supreme Court will kick off its November argument session with the highest-profile cases of that session: challenges to the consideration of race in the admissions process at Harvard and the University of NorthCarolina. University of NorthCarolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. 11, to Nov.
NorthCarolina State Conference of the NAACP addresses the ability of NorthCarolina legislators to defend the state’s voter-ID law from lawsuits under the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act. NorthCarolina State Conference of the NAACP. In Broadnax v.
Toyota and Subaru urged the NorthCarolina Supreme Court to review an appeals court'sdecision that left in place a slew of "impossible" discovery obligations, saying they are "unjustly" being held responsible for violations they did not commit and face "a likelihood of crushing" sanctions.
Two recent decisions by the NorthCarolina Supreme Court, State v. Kelliher and State v. Conner , could potentially help free people imprisoned and serving a “de facto life sentence” for crimes they committed when they were kids, reports NC Policy Watch.
Several of them are sequels to earlier high courtdecisions. First Amendment The current court is very solicitous of First Amendment rights. and NorthCarolina Farm Bureau Federation v. A federal district court in NorthCarolina ultimately invalidated much of the law, and the U.S.
‘Medical Climate’ While the Supreme Courtdecision is not expected for another few months, many physicians and legal advocacy groups warn that if the justices rule in such a way that creates a “medical climate” where doctors fear incarceration for prescribing appropriate pain treatment.
University of NorthCarolina , the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the college admissions programs of Harvard University and the University of NorthCarolina. The Court held that the raced-based policies violated the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. In Students for Fair Admissions v.
Reaction to the Furman decision was swift. Some states, such as Louisiana and NorthCarolina, enacted mandatory death penalty statutes, eliminating discretion entirely from the death penalty system. Death penalty states worked hard to discern its meaning and to ascertain what they could do to restore capital punishment.
Board of Trustees of NorthCarolina State University , which was unfortunately not reviewed by the Supreme Court. I was discussing the Fourth Circuit case of Porter v. Now, as feared, it is being replicated by the Sixth Circuit in Gruber v. of Trustees.
The Court of Appeals of NorthCarolina ruled Thursday that people who are or have been in a dating relationship with a same-sex partner are equally protected against domestic violence as persons in opposite-sex relationships placed in a similar situation. While relying on the Supreme Courtdecision in Bostock v.
NorthCarolina reproductive rights groups Monday filed a motion seeking to temporarily enjoin a ban on advanced healthcare professionals providing medication abortions. The motion alleges that clinics in NorthCarolina have expanded service availability from one day per week to three days per week since Roe was overturned.
The report first provides a comprehensive display of how states have changed their abortion policies since June 2022 when the Supreme Courtdecision in Dobbs v. The report comes as abortion bans are being struck down in many states, including Nebraska , NorthCarolina , and South Carolina. Wade precedent.
University of NorthCarolina , 21-707. The court earlier asked for the U.S. Moving on to potential blockbusters that don’t explicitly call on the court to overrule precedent. United States — in which a splintered majority of the Supreme Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. They invoke Rapanos v.
The US Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals declined Tuesday to rehear with the full Eighth Circuit panel of judges a prior appeals courtdecision curtailing private organizations’ ability to sue under section two of the Voting Rights Act for alleged racial gerrymandering in redistricting decisions.
“How an upcoming Supreme Court case could upend 2024 election laws, lawsuits; At issue in the case out of NorthCarolina is whether rules for federal elections set by state legislatures can be reviewed by state courts; But a decision in the case could have far greater impacts”: John Fritze of USA Today has this report.
Share For obvious reasons, the Supreme Court’sdecision on Monday to grant certiorari in a pair of cases challenging race-based affirmative action in higher education drew major headlines. University of NorthCarolina. Less well noticed was a curious procedural feature of the second case, Students for Fair Admissions v.
And I had their ear, explaining Supreme Courtdecisions on a regular basis over many years. Darius Swann helped transform the promise of Brown into a court-enforced mandate. The three television networks had enormous influence. Millions of Americans would time their day to be home for the evening news.
Share The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Tuesday in a clash over whether a NorthCarolina-based company can challenge the Food and Drug Administrations denial of its application to market e-cigarettes in the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in Louisiana. The company, R.J.
However, for Jackson, it was immaterial since she was allowed to vote in the sister case involving the University of NorthCarolina. Here is the lower courtdecision: St. It is reminiscent of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s recusal in the Harvard affirmative action case due to herclose ties to that institution.
Share In a major election-law decision, the Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that although the Constitution gives state legislatures the power to regulate federal elections, state courts can supervise the legislature’s exercise of that power. Roberts agreed that the court did have the power to decide the case on the merits.
Supreme Court will review a Colorado Supreme Courtdecision disqualifying Donald Trump from appearing on the state’s 2024 ballot on grounds he violated section 3 of the federal Constitution’s 14th amendment by engaging in insurrection. Combined, the seven amici have almost 100 years of state supreme court experience.
The Ninth Circuit said the new issuance of NWP 12 rendered the appeals moot and ordered the district court to dismiss the underlying claim. The Ninth Circuit declined, however, to take a position on whether the underlying cases were moot in their entirety and also declined to vacate any district courtdecisions.
Two prominent voting rights advocacy groups sued Republican state leadership in NorthCarolina over the state’s redistricting plans. The Republican majority redrew state legislative and congressional districts in October, which Common Cause says was to “severely diminish the voting power of Black voters in NorthCarolina.”
The case concerns NorthCarolina’s congressional district map, created by the Republican-controlled legislature last year. NorthCarolina’s Supreme Court struck down the map as an unconstitutional gerrymander, and Republican lawmakers appealed to the US Supreme Court.
Theodore Shaw, a professor of law at the University of NorthCarolina and former leader of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, told the subcommittee that “the fact-findings that the chief justice made, or purported to make, in [his majority opinion in] Shelby County were wrong.” The broader question was framed by Sen.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed, ruling that the 50% tariff was part of an ongoing plan of action that Trump had properly initiated earlier. The non-profit has now also filed a petition in a challenge to the University of NorthCarolina that it hopes can serve as a companion to the Harvard case.
Harper arose from a challenge to a new congressional map adopted by NorthCarolina’s Republican-controlled legislature in early November 2021. The NorthCarolina Supreme Court struck down the map after finding that it was a partisan gerrymander in violation of the NorthCarolina constitution.
University of NorthCarolina. The last time the court dealt with the issue of race in admissions was 2016 in Fisher v. The court upheld the use of race in the admissions process of the University of Texas at Austin by a vote of 4-3. President & Fellows of Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v.
In interpreting state law in this area, state courts may not so exceed the bounds of ordinary judicial review as to unconstitutionally intrude upon the role specifically reserved to state legislatures by Article I, Section 4, of the Federal Constitution. The US Supreme Court granted certiorari and heard oral arguments in 2022.
Another poll at the University of NorthCarolina found that conservative students are 300 times more likely to self-censor themselves due to the intolerance of opposing views on our campuses. Last term’s Supreme Courtdecisions are just the most recent high-profile evidence for this. Heidi Li Feldman. HeidiLiFeldman. ·.
Three Republican senators – Josh Hawley of Missouri, Mike Lee of Utah, and Ted Cruz of Texas – write that a precedent can be unworkable due to “a history of confusion in the lower courts, an unstable pattern of Supreme Courtdecisions, and a persistent lack of judicially manageable standards.”
We are awaiting the potential blockbuster ruling of the Supreme Court in the Harvard and NorthCarolina college admissions cases. After decades of conflicting and confusing rulings on the use of race as a factor for admissions, the Court could be close to rejecting the practice. For critics, that is an understatement.
I think people are aware of high-profile issues… what the Supreme Court does on abortion, gun rights, affirmative action, but my guess is that people don’t realize that there has been no Supreme Courtdecision since 1986, 35 years ago, about eyewitness identification. There have been some justices who have stressed it.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content