This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A newly revised NorthCarolina juvenile justice law will take effect Sunday, aiming to address gaps in handling serious offenses by minors. Additionally, cases previously transferred to adult court may be reconsidered for juvenile jurisdiction, depending on the charges and circumstances.
Share At oral arguments earlier this week the Supreme Court was skeptical of the Food and Drug Administrations effort to block a NorthCarolina-based company from challenging the denial of its application to market e-cigarettes in the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in Louisiana.
NorthCarolina State Conference of the NAACP addresses the ability of NorthCarolina legislators to defend the state’s voter-ID law from lawsuits under the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act. NorthCarolina State Conference of the NAACP. In Broadnax v. The case is George v.
Several of them are sequels to earlier high courtdecisions. First Amendment The current court is very solicitous of First Amendment rights. and NorthCarolina Farm Bureau Federation v. A federal district court in NorthCarolina ultimately invalidated much of the law, and the U.S.
Some states, such as Louisiana and NorthCarolina, enacted mandatory death penalty statutes, eliminating discretion entirely from the death penalty system. This time the court’s verdict was less equivocal, though no less divided. In a 5-4 decision, it struck down mandatory death sentencing statutes.
The Court of Appeals of NorthCarolina ruled Thursday that people who are or have been in a dating relationship with a same-sex partner are equally protected against domestic violence as persons in opposite-sex relationships placed in a similar situation. While relying on the Supreme Courtdecision in Bostock v.
University of NorthCarolina , 21-707. The court earlier asked for the U.S. Moving on to potential blockbusters that don’t explicitly call on the court to overrule precedent. United States — in which a splintered majority of the Supreme Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. They invoke Rapanos v.
Share For obvious reasons, the Supreme Court’sdecision on Monday to grant certiorari in a pair of cases challenging race-based affirmative action in higher education drew major headlines. University of NorthCarolina. Less well noticed was a curious procedural feature of the second case, Students for Fair Admissions v.
Cohen – who first met the Lovings when he was just 29 – filed a lawsuit on their behalf, challenging the Virginia law and similar state statutes as violating the 14th Amendment. He and his co-counsel, Philip Hirschkop, took the case to the Supreme Court. Virginia , the court did find the statute unconstitutional.
The New Jersey court also found no basis for Grable jurisdiction, rejecting the companies’ arguments that the City’s claims necessarily raised substantial and actually disputed issues of federal law such as First Amendment issues or issues addressed by federal environmental statutes. Northern Plains Resource Council v.
In their petition, the challengers argue that the Federal Circuit’s decision contradicts a prior Supreme Courtdecision that held that Section 232 is not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power to the executive branch because the statute establishes clear preconditions that the president must follow.
Another poll at the University of NorthCarolina found that conservative students are 300 times more likely to self-censor themselves due to the intolerance of opposing views on our campuses. Last term’s Supreme Courtdecisions are just the most recent high-profile evidence for this. Heidi Li Feldman. HeidiLiFeldman. ·.
Three Republican senators – Josh Hawley of Missouri, Mike Lee of Utah, and Ted Cruz of Texas – write that a precedent can be unworkable due to “a history of confusion in the lower courts, an unstable pattern of Supreme Courtdecisions, and a persistent lack of judicially manageable standards.”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content