This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Pennsylvania District Judge David Ridge issued an order Friday for 17,000 voters, who did not receive mail-in ballots, granting them early in-person voting and new absentee ballots to replace the missing ones. The post Pennsylvania judge orders new absentee ballots for voters missing mail-in ballots appeared first on JURIST - News.
The US Supreme Court rejected Friday an RNC application to stay a recent Pennsylvania Supreme Courtdecision that grants voters who cast defective mail-in ballots an option to alternatively cast in-person provisional ballots. The RNC also relied on a 2020 state case, Pennsylvania Democratic Party v.
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld its previous decision on Tuesday which found Pennsylvania statutes preventing “18-to-20-year-olds from carrying firearms outside their homes during a state of emergency” unconstitutional. The appellants appealed, and the appeals court reversed the district courtdecision.
It covers the trends, people and finances of the legal profession from Wall Street to Main Street to Pennsylvania Avenue. The ABA Journal is read by half of the nation's 1 million lawyers every month.
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has issued an interesting decision on personal jurisdiction: Hammons v. Ethicon, Inc., 3d 537 (2020). The majority opinion by Justice Baer begins: This case presents a challenge to the exercise of specific personal jurisdiction.
Supreme Court'sdecision on Monday to take up a case about the reach of a Pennsylvania law could have a "seismic impact" on corporate litigation if the justices rule that a state can exercise jurisdiction over companies registered to do business there, legal experts told Law360.
The Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday urged a Pennsylvania federal judge to reject a tree service company's bid to pause its challenge of the agency's noncompete ban, arguing that another district court'sdecision to set the ban aside nationwide doesn't justify a stay because the agency is mulling an appeal.
Recent state supreme courtdecisions from New York, New Mexico, Pennsylvania and Georgia implicate whether a corporate defendant will be subject to suit for claims unconnected to a state merely for registering to do business there, and the tension between the Georgia Supreme Court'sdecision and settled precedent means the issue may be before the U.S. (..)
After he left the company, Mallory moved to Pennsylvania for a period before returning to Virginia. Mallory filed his lawsuit in Pennsylvania state court. In fact, Norfolk Southern has registered to do business in Pennsylvania in light of its “regular, systematic, [and] extensive” operations there. Washington , 326 U.S.
Arguing that Mansky had approved of an earlier Supreme Courtdecision allowing transit authorities to prohibit such advertising, the transit system asks for the court’s review. The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v.
The argument revealed a bench deeply skeptical of the uncertainty maritime insurance contracts would face under a lower-courtdecision limiting the enforcement of choice-of-law clauses in those contracts. In this case, for example, a European insurance company insured a yacht owned by a Pennsylvania company.
Pennsylvania and Wisconsin , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that uncashed MoneyGram checks are governed by the Disposition of Abandoned Money Orders and Traveler’s Check Act (FDA) and should be returned to the state where they were issued. In Delaware v. It was Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s first opinion.
In an opinion joined by Justices Antonin Scalia and Thomas, Rehnquist contended that the recount ordered by a state court violated the legislature’s authority under the electors clause because it conflicted with the deadlines set by the state legislature. Roberts agreed that the court did have the power to decide the case on the merits.
The US Supreme Court Monday declined to review the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling that overturned entertainer Bill Cosby’s sexual assault conviction. Cosby appealed the decision, and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturned his conviction in June 2021.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district courtdecision that vacated the listing of the Beringia distinct population segment (DPS) of the Pacific bearded seal subspecies as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Climate Litigation Chart (Update #92): FEATURED CASE. Alaska Oil & Gas Association v.
A Hawaii court held that the Hawai‘i Environmental Policy Act requires environmental review for commercial taking of aquarium fish and that Department of Land and Natural Resources issuance and renewal of licenses for commercial aquarium collection without environmental review was invalid and illegal.
Keeping elderly offenders in prison until their deaths is expensive, too: the report found that Pennsylvania pays at least $122 million per year in care for people over 50 serving life without parole in the state’s prisons. At 9,802, the state imprisons more than twice the people serving LWP than the second-highest population in Pennsylvania.
Some older Supreme Courtdecisions support that theory of consent. Some courts read [Supreme Court precedent] as effectively foreclosing [this consent-by-registration theory of jurisdiction], while others insist it remains viable.”.
By allowing judges to ignore such considerations when sentencing a young person to die behind bars, the recent Supreme Courtdecision promises to further inequity. Since 2012, Louisiana has sentenced 57 percent of eligible juvenile offenders to life without parole compared to fewer than 2 percent in Pennsylvania.
It’s a little surprising the court let stand a federal courtdecision invalidating a state statute on constitutional grounds, but animal-rights groups defending that decision argued persuasively that state statutes are in a state of flux and it would be premature for the justices to take up the case now.
Thursday’s survey revealed overwhelming public support for stronger Supreme Court ethics on other issues. Nearly half of respondents, 47 percent, also support giving the public the power to vote on overturning controversial Supreme Courtdecisions.
John Bailey, a police sergeant in Pennsylvania, was among the first to tap Harpster and Adams for help after learning about their technique from the FBI. The FBI, which declined to comment for this article, published some of the dissent in another law enforcement bulletin. But the reversal has gone largely unnoticed.
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Supreme Court case may determine winner of Pennsylvania’s GOP Senate primary (Ariane de Vogue, CNN). Supreme Court blocks Texas social media moderation ban (Adi Robertson, The Verge). Do Dissents of the Past Foreshadow Dissents on the Current Court? Adam Feldman, Empirical SCOTUS).
Supreme Courtdecisions indicate that it is “inherently prejudicial” for a defendant to appear before a jury in shackles, but both the state courts and the lower federal courts rejected his claims. Whatley argued that U.S. Nearly three months after Inauguration Day, the justices vacated a ruling by the U.S.
The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled Thursday that a federal statute requiring people to be 21 to purchase handguns from Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) conflicts with previous Supreme Courtdecisions and the Second Amendment.
In Pennsylvania v. Cosby , justices rebuffed a request from Pennsylvania prosecutors to revive sexual assault charges against Cosby. But the Pennsylvania Supreme Court threw out Cosby’s conviction, reasoning that he had relied on a 2005 press release in which a prosecutor, citing lack of evidence, had declined to file charges.
Smith , and if so, whether the Supreme Court should overrule Smith. The court faced but did not decide the issue of whether to overrule Smith in last term’s Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.). Two terms ago, the Supreme Court held by a 5-4 vote in McGirt v. Pennsylvania , 20-7805. They invoke Rapanos v.
Under Clinton, Days was initially seen as a potential candidate for a seat on the Supreme Court. But he became the center of a political firestorm after he told the court that it should not affirm the conviction of a Pennsylvania man who was found guilty of possessing sexually explicit videotapes of minors. The George H.W.
He also testified that in all of the courtdecisions he reviewed regarding Trump’s claims, the Trump campaign did not make cogent claims of fraud. Gore , said that it would not have been possible for Trump to make up his 10,000 vote deficit in Arizona, or any other state, with a normal recount.
Raiders, a Pennsylvania-based company, insured a yacht with Great Lakes. The insurer then filed an action for declaratory judgment in federal district court in Pennsylvania to determine whether the policy was indeed void. It argues that the 3rd Circuit’s decision has thrown all of that into upheaval and must be reviewed.
Three Republican senators – Josh Hawley of Missouri, Mike Lee of Utah, and Ted Cruz of Texas – write that a precedent can be unworkable due to “a history of confusion in the lower courts, an unstable pattern of Supreme Courtdecisions, and a persistent lack of judicially manageable standards.”
9] See Iva Lea Aurer, Guest Commentary: An Assessment of the Hague District CourtsDecision in Milieudefensie et al. 10] See Maria Antonia Tigre and Marlies Hesselman, Milieudefensie v Shell: 3 Takeaways and Challenges on the Appeals CourtDecision, Climate Law: A Sabin Center Blog, Dec. Strine, Jr., 8] See Cynthia A.
It is listed on the Social Science Research Network as “forthcoming” this year in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review.) There is debate over “officer of the United States” and “Term Limits,” which the chief justice asks Mitchell to clarify that he’s referring to a 1995 Supreme Courtdecision, U.S. 6 assault on the U.S.
UK Supreme Court Overturned an Appellate CourtDecision, Allowing the Approval Process for a Third Runway at Heathrow International Airport to Move Forward. Bureau of Land Management , No. 4:20-cv-00115 (D. filed Dec. HERE ARE RECENT ADDITIONS TO THE INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART.
DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district courtdecision that vacated the listing of the Arctic ringed seal as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). order setting schedule Mar. 1, 2018; order denying remand and notice re tutorial Feb.
Pennsylvania is less than 24 hours out from primary elections—and there are some major issues on the line right here on JURIST’s doorstep that have attracted national and even international attention. Pennsylvania primaries are a complicated beast to explain to in-state people, let alone out-of-state or out-of-country.
So let’s walk down Pennsylvania Avenue.” We need to put this insidious legal theory to rest with the finality and clarity of a Supreme Courtdecision. Such marches are common — on both federal and state capitols — to protest or to support actions occurring inside. I hope that she does. Here is the opinion: Anderson v.
The petitions in Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania Democratic Party , 20-574 , involve challenges to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ’s extension of an absentee-voting deadline last year. They argue that the court nonetheless should grant review in order to clarify the law for future elections.
Law Firm Following Court Approval. after a courtdecision made it the first Big Four accounting firm eligible to practice law in the country. The Arizona Supreme Court on Thursday granted the accounting giant final approval to obtain a license to create its own firm, KPMG Law. Read more here (gift link). #2
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content