Remove Court Decisions Remove Procedural Law Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Supreme Court likely to let vape company’s FDA challenge proceed

SCOTUSBlog

Suri told the justices that this was not a question of convenience, but instead about Congresss choice in the statute to delineate where cases can be brought. A decision in the case is expected by summer. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.

Court 97
article thumbnail

Restitution, medical malpractice, and a capital appeal

SCOTUSBlog

In 1993, William Neilly was sentenced in Michigan state court to life without the possibility of parole for a homicide he committed as a juvenile. Because of intervening Supreme Court decisions prohibiting the imposition of no-parole life sentences for juvenile offenders, he was resentenced to a lesser sentence.

Court 97
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Territorial Jurisdiction for Breach of Contract in Nigeria or whatever

Conflict of Laws

Jurisdiction is a fundamental aspect of Nigerian procedural law. In Nigerian judicial parlance, we have become accustomed to the principle that the issue of jurisdiction can be raised at any time, even at the Nigerian Supreme Court – the highest court of the land – for the first time. [1] 2] (2021) 7 NWLR (Pt.

article thumbnail

Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 5/2022: Abstracts

Conflict of Laws

Localising the place of damage in the context of capital investment cases is a perennial problem both under national and European civil procedural law. The Cologne court decision combined several precedents of the German Federal Court and the European Court of Justice. This norm is part of procedural law.

article thumbnail

Update: HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention Repository

Conflict of Laws

The Recognition and Enforcement of Court Decisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil Procedure Law and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Martiny, Dieter. Baden-Baden 2021, pp 127-146. Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. “The 21-19 (available here ). 258-261.

article thumbnail

Update: HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention Repository

Conflict of Laws

The Recognition and Enforcement of Court Decisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil Procedure Law and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. , DePaul Law Review 52 (2002), pp 319-349. Martiny, Dieter. Silberman, Linda.

article thumbnail

Update: HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention Repository

Conflict of Laws

The Recognition and Enforcement of Court Decisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil Procedure Law and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Martiny, Dieter. Baden-Baden 2021, pp 127-146. Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. “The 21-19 (available here ). 258-261.