This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Suri told the justices that this was not a question of convenience, but instead about Congresss choice in the statute to delineate where cases can be brought. A decision in the case is expected by summer. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.
In 1993, William Neilly was sentenced in Michigan state court to life without the possibility of parole for a homicide he committed as a juvenile. Because of intervening Supreme Courtdecisions prohibiting the imposition of no-parole life sentences for juvenile offenders, he was resentenced to a lesser sentence.
Jurisdiction is a fundamental aspect of Nigerian procedurallaw. In Nigerian judicial parlance, we have become accustomed to the principle that the issue of jurisdiction can be raised at any time, even at the Nigerian Supreme Court – the highest court of the land – for the first time. [1] 2] (2021) 7 NWLR (Pt.
Localising the place of damage in the context of capital investment cases is a perennial problem both under national and European civil procedurallaw. The Cologne courtdecision combined several precedents of the German Federal Court and the European Court of Justice. This norm is part of procedurallaw.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Martiny, Dieter. Baden-Baden 2021, pp 127-146. Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. “The 21-19 (available here ). 258-261.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. , DePaul Law Review 52 (2002), pp 319-349. Martiny, Dieter. Silberman, Linda.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Martiny, Dieter. Baden-Baden 2021, pp 127-146. Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. “The 21-19 (available here ). 258-261.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Martiny, Dieter. Baden-Baden 2021, pp 127-146. Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. “The 21-19 (available here ). 258-261.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. , DePaul Law Review 52 (2002), pp 319-349. Martiny, Dieter. Silberman, Linda.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Martiny, Dieter. Baden-Baden 2021, pp 127-146. Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. “The 21-19 (available here ). 258-261.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Martiny, Dieter. Baden-Baden 2021, pp 127-146. Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. “The 21-19 (available here ). 258-261.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Martiny, Dieter. Baden-Baden 2021, pp 127-146. Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. “The 21-19 (available here ). 258-261.
Martiny, Dieter “The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Lignes de force, état des lieux et perspectives pour la Belgique », Journal des Tribunaux (JT) 2022-12, pp.
Martiny, Dieter “The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Lignes de force, état des lieux et perspectives pour la Belgique », Journal des Tribunaux (JT) 2022-12, pp.
Martiny, Dieter “The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Lignes de force, état des lieux et perspectives pour la Belgique », Journal des Tribunaux (JT) 2022-12, pp.
However, Arroyos ADA claim had already been decided in his favor, and the only remaining issue was his state law claim for damages under the Unruh Act. Decision The Ninth Circuit reversed the district courtsdecision to dismiss the Unruh Act claim, ruling that the federal court should have kept jurisdiction over it.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content