Doctrinal “dinosaur” or stare decisis? Justices wrestle with patent-law precedent.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 23, 2021
It has been accused of infringing patented technology invented by the company’s founder and wants to avoid liability for patent infringement. Wolf principally argued that stare decisis justifies maintaining the doctrine. The post Doctrinal “dinosaur” or stare decisis? Matthew Wolf argued for Hologic.
83 
Let's personalize your content