Remove Court Decisions Remove Stare Decisis Remove Texas
article thumbnail

Religion and the Death Penalty’s Most Devout Supporters: “Father Forgive them, for They Know Not What They Are Doing”

The Crime Report

On January 21, 2023, he hanged himself on death row at the Polunsky Unit in Livingston, Texas. Andrus’ decision to end his own life rather than allow the State of Texas to take it came roughly six months after the U.S. In its June 2020 decision , the U.S. That did not end his tragic story.

article thumbnail

Allegations of racial bias in a death penalty trial

SCOTUSBlog

Texas , 21-6001. Issues : (1) Whether, on remand, the Texas court rejected the Supreme Court’s conclusions in Andrus v. rescheduled before the Jan. 25, March 4, March 18, March 25, April 1, April 14, April 22 and April 29 conferences; relisted after the May 12 conference). Returning Relists.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Animal rights and the First Amendment, due process and a confession of error

SCOTUSBlog

Texas , involving allegations that a racially biased juror, who commented during voir dire that “non-white” races were statistically more violent than whites, served on petitioner Kristopher Love’s capital sentencing jury. Some older Supreme Court decisions support that theory of consent. Texas , 21-6001.

Statute 107
article thumbnail

Private rights of action, overtime pay, and the constitutionality of a billboard tax

SCOTUSBlog

It’s a little surprising the court let stand a federal court decision invalidating a state statute on constitutional grounds, but animal-rights groups defending that decision argued persuasively that state statutes are in a state of flux and it would be premature for the justices to take up the case now. Texas , 21-6001.

Statute 86
article thumbnail

Modernize U.S. abortion law — and return abortion policy to the democratic process

SCOTUSBlog

The Texas Heartbeat Act exemplifies lawmakers’ frustration with the status quo and their determination to protect unborn children and mothers. The abortion providers’ case relies heavily on stare decisis.

article thumbnail

We read all the amicus briefs in Dobbs so you don’t have to

SCOTUSBlog

Trinity Legal Center and Catholic Medical Association, National Association of Catholic Nurses-USA, Idaho Chooses Life and Texas Alliance for Life make similar arguments. Against stare decisis. Many amici focus on the principle of stare decisis – and urge the court not to follow it in this case.