Court Decisions Statute Washington 
SCOTUSBlog
NOVEMBER 29, 2021
Natural Resources Defense Council , determines when a federal court must defer to an agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers. First, under step one, if the court determines Congress’ intent is clear and unambiguous in the statute, the court will interpret the statute according to its terms, without deferring to the agency.
Patently O
FEBRUARY 20, 2023
And, Congress has so since the beginning, with George Washington signing the the First Patent Act into law in 1790. As Congress continued to legislatively develop the statute, courts also added common law nuance, including the law of patent eligibility. Constitution authorizes Congress to legislatively create a patent system.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Broadcast Law Blog
FEBRUARY 20, 2014
Aereo finally lost a court decision. This is the first case that Aereo itself has lost, also winning a favorable decision from a District Court in Boston which essentially followed the Second Circuits reasoning (see our summary of the Boston decision here ).
Patently O
AUGUST 8, 2022
The short provision has remained essentially unchanged since it was originally handwritten in the 1700s and signed into law by President George Washington. ” Unfortunately, due to a series of Supreme Court decisions, patent eligibility law in the United States has become confused, constricted, and unclear in recent years.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 27, 2022
Animal Legal Defense Fund , involving the constitutionality of a Kansas statute criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. McCall , the other case raising the issue, which the court will now hold pending the outcome of Mallory. Next up is Bartenwerfer v.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 20, 2022
Two pending petitions raise the question of the constitutionality of state statutes providing that corporations are deemed to have consented to “general” personal jurisdiction by virtue of having registered to do business in a state. Some older Supreme Court decisions support that theory of consent. Returning Relists.
Constitutional Law Reporter
AUGUST 28, 2023
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court sided with Norfolk Southern, holding that the Pennsylvania law violated Due Process. Supreme Court’s Decision The Supreme Court reversed. Washington , 326 U.S. According to the Court, those decisions did not overrule the precedent established in Pennsylvania Fire Ins.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
100 
Let's personalize your content