This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Pennsylvania and Wisconsin , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that uncashed MoneyGram checks are governed by the Disposition of Abandoned Money Orders and Traveler’s Check Act (FDA) and should be returned to the state where they were issued. In Delaware v. It was Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s first opinion.
Circuit also rejected EPA’s argument that the court did not have authority to review stays issued under Section 307(d)(7)(D) of the Clean Air Act. The Second Circuit said the Connecticut statutes authorizing the solicitations did not compel utilities to enter into contracts with specific bidders. NEW CASES, MOTIONS, AND NOTICES.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Ratification of the 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters”, Wisconsin International Law Review 38 (2021), pp. Meier, Niklaus.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Ratification of the 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters”, Wisconsin International Law Review 38 (2021), pp. Meier, Niklaus.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Ratification of the 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters”, Wisconsin International Law Review 38 (2021), pp. Meier, Niklaus.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Ratification of the 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters”, Wisconsin International Law Review 38 (2021), pp. Meier, Niklaus.
A Hawaii court held that the Hawai‘i Environmental Policy Act requires environmental review for commercial taking of aquarium fish and that Department of Land and Natural Resources issuance and renewal of licenses for commercial aquarium collection without environmental review was invalid and illegal.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Ratification of the 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters”, Wisconsin International Law Review 38 (2021), pp. Meier, Niklaus.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Ratification of the 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters”, Wisconsin International Law Review 38 (2021), pp. Meier, Niklaus.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Ratification of the 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters”, Wisconsin International Law Review 38 (2021), pp. Meier, Niklaus.
The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Ratification of the 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters”, Wisconsin International Law Review 38 (2021), pp. Meier, Niklaus.
Coverage of federal fraud statutes Porat v. Todd Heath sued Wisconsin Bell under the False Claims Act, alleging that the company charged schools and libraries impermissibly high prices under the E-rate program, thereby rendering each reimbursement request a false claim. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit reversed.
Moreover, Won contends that the ruling is in tension with prior Supreme Courtdecisions allowing video testimony only under a tougher standard when justified by important public policy, such as shielding children who were sexually abused from having to face their alleged abusers in court. Zuniga-Ayala v.
Moving on to potential blockbusters that don’t explicitly call on the court to overrule precedent. Environmental Protection Agency , 21-454 , is a long-running Clean Water Act dispute that has already been the subject of one major Supreme Courtdecision. Wisconsin v. Wisconsin v. They invoke Rapanos v.
Martiny, Dieter “The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Ratification of the 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters”, Wisconsin International Law Review 38 (2021), pp.
Martiny, Dieter “The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Ratification of the 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters”, Wisconsin International Law Review 38 (2021), pp.
Martiny, Dieter “The Recognition and Enforcement of CourtDecisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), Ratification of the 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters”, Wisconsin International Law Review 38 (2021), pp.
This week, we highlight cert petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, what level of First Amendment scrutiny applies to a state law governing slogans that appear alongside candidates’ names on the ballot. A federal district court dismissed their lawsuit. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit upheld that dismissal.
In the other two, on April 22 and 30, the court will consider whether parents can opt to have their children excused from instruction with LGBTQ-themed storybooks, on religious grounds, and whether a Catholic online school can become the country’s first religious charter school.
The New Jersey court also found no basis for Grable jurisdiction, rejecting the companies’ arguments that the City’s claims necessarily raised substantial and actually disputed issues of federal law such as First Amendment issues or issues addressed by federal environmental statutes. Northern Plains Resource Council v.
1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. The district court rejected eight grounds for removal, but the Fourth Circuit concluded its appellate jurisdiction was limited to determining whether the companies properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. Safe Skies Clean Water Wisconsin, Inc.
Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute.
Circuit majority opinion’s interpretation was foreclosed by the statute and violated separation of powers. The states argued that the Supreme Court’s stay of the Clean Power Plan while it was under review by the D.C. DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS. 20-1530 (U.S. 29, 2021); North American Coal Corp. 20-1531 (U.S. County of Maui v.
In Minnesota, the district court granted the State of Minnesota’s motion to remand its case, which asserts state law claims under common law and consumer protection statutes. s consumer protection statute. On March 26, 2021, the court denied Exxon’s emergency motion for a temporary stay of the remand order.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content